894
submitted 1 day ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] [email protected] 11 points 15 hours ago

it's not and it hasn't... keep fighting until he is mayor and starts enacting what he is promising

[-] [email protected] 27 points 21 hours ago

Failed? It's been less than a week. They're threatening to denaturalize and deport him. Sounds like they're very frightened.

[-] [email protected] 46 points 1 day ago

Media: "Everyone, this guy doesn't grovel for Israel!"

Everyone: "okay that sounds good."

Not sure if this was a smear campaign as much as the lobby getting high on it's own supply.

[-] [email protected] 9 points 23 hours ago

It would be nice if the media made it easy for us and just kept reminding who is funded by AIAPAC.

[-] [email protected] 31 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

Remember when trump invited the taliban to camp david...

[-] [email protected] 18 points 22 hours ago

Bruh, no, I didn't remember until you posted this. Holy shit. It's been a longass 10 years.

[-] [email protected] 22 points 22 hours ago

Am Jewish, am native New Yorker, no longer live there, would vote Mamdani. Fuck Israel.

[-] HobbitFoot 102 points 1 day ago
[-] [email protected] 52 points 1 day ago

But they just keep making him more cool.

zohranthedestroyer.com

[-] [email protected] 6 points 18 hours ago

A.) If this is a right-wing smear, it's their typical laziness. Can't be bothered to implement https? Even if it's a redirect it's sloppy.

B.) Look at this registrar info from their who is:

[-] [email protected] 5 points 18 hours ago

Nevermind about the whois...the info is all from the privacy provider the registrar uses.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 14 hours ago

Mamdani should lean into it. What would be beautiful is if he set up a page on his website listing all the specific corruption and inequity he aims to destroy.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 15 hours ago

lol it just redirects to his campaign site

[-] [email protected] 4 points 23 hours ago

Love the style of his website, great design

[-] [email protected] 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Damn website won't load

Prolly a good sign!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 31 points 1 day ago

Seriously. It's not "failed"; it's in full fuckin' swing.

[-] [email protected] 171 points 1 day ago

But Cuomo tried very hard to turn it into a referendum on Mamdani’s views on Israel and Palestine—and the media establishment took the bait.

It's weird this is an issue in a mayoral campaign in the USA. The role has no foreign policy authority whatsoever, and Palestine/Israel is 5700 miles from NYC.

[-] [email protected] 19 points 1 day ago

Plus, Israel is super unpopular right now. Mainstream media and establishment politicians don't get this. The more they criticize Mamdani for his lack of allegiance to Israel, the more people will vote for him!

[-] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago

MSM used to know that they needed to smear anti-Israel candidates on other subjects. They got high on their own supply. Probably because they fired all the non zealots.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 16 hours ago

I think they are used to the old world in which being able to intentionally conflate being anti-Israel with "antisemitic" and have that bullshit being swallowed by most people.

The days of them being gatekeepers on that in particular are long, long gone. It is and always was complete horseshit to label anyone critical of Israel running an open-air prison "antisemitic", but for most of my lifetime, that was just de rigueur. If anyone were to question it, you'd have most of the left and the right coming down on them.

I think the more that MSM continues to try to cling that, the more they will lose credibility on lots of other things. At least some of them now seem to recognize that most of us think their "both sides" framing is complete horseshit and it's become nearly a punchline, finally, after all these years. They will probably cling to that even harder than the Israel gatekeeping they do. Related, I think they'll really resist calling the lying liars on the right out on their lies and invective the most.

As an example, I constantly see most of them not even blink when a prominent Republican sits there and talks about the "Democrat Party". Anyone in media must know this is an intentional and constant slur and yet, they don't call them out on it. I'd like to see them sitting there and not correcting the Republicans and asking why they INSIST on this constant insult taken as nearly the same punchline as "both sides" framing is right now and start to change their behavior. They have been letting the Republicans do this for decades and they know full well what is going on, and do nothing. I'm so sick of that. It's no small thing, it's a corollary to the "both sides" framing that is so harmful to our nation - letting Republicans sit there and insult most of the country as well as lie brazenly and not get called out on it as to what they are doing....

[-] [email protected] 18 points 1 day ago

Yeah the most bizarre thing to me was seeing the debate and hearing a question about foreign nation visits

Like wtf is a city mayor doing visiting other countries and why would we care

That was super weird. It was trying to bait out mamdani and other progressive views about Israel but man what a word question for a mayoral race

[-] [email protected] 133 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

He’s about to raise taxes on ~350k millionaires, while increasing wages and lowering the cost of groceries and rent. It’s everything Trump promised in his campaign, but he’s doing it the exact opposite way.

When it works, Trump is gonna look like a dick, and the nation will see that democratic socialism will get them what they were promised.

[-] [email protected] 43 points 1 day ago

the nation will see that democratic socialism will get them what they were promised.

What's that old saying like "none are so blind as those who will not see"? I feel like people are so emotionally invested in "socialism bad, democrats bad" that it's going to be hard for them to accept contradicting that.

[-] [email protected] 29 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Yes. We are talking about dumbasses that like the ACA, but hate "Obamacare" - which apparently has "death panels"....

[-] [email protected] 9 points 23 hours ago

The insurance companies are the death panels.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] [email protected] 25 points 1 day ago

It won’t work because, like every socialist system everywhere, capitalists will seek to undermine and interfere.

load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (22 replies)
[-] [email protected] 38 points 1 day ago

There's a huge Jewish population in NYC, and many mistakenly assume that all of them support what Israel is doing. To a lot of people Judaism=Zionism.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

That's a weird assumption. Many Jews strongly oppose it, including Bernie Sanders, Jon Stewart, Ben and Jerry from the ice cream, and probably millions of less famous Jews.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] [email protected] 175 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The smear campaign against Zohran Mamdani isn't over, and won't be over for as long as he's in politics, and then a little after.

[-] [email protected] 86 points 1 day ago

Definitely not over. Assuming he wins the election, I would anticipate a lot of sabotage stemming from establishment politicians and public servants. If they can't win this election, they'll want to make his term as mayor as discordant and ineffectual as possible, to make it easier for a more conservative/establishment candidate to win the next one.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 26 points 1 day ago

There's no smear they could've done that's worse than what Cuomo had going on.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 23 hours ago

I live nowhere near New York but have heard his name lots. What’s the deal with Cuomo?

[-] [email protected] 14 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

Typical political scumbaggery, ethics issues, sexual harassment allegations, etc

[-] [email protected] 3 points 22 hours ago

I kinda figured just by looking at the guy.

Thanks

[-] [email protected] 40 points 1 day ago

Doesn't he still have to win the general? So we'll see if it failed or not.

[-] [email protected] 23 points 1 day ago

In New York, the Dem primary is MUCH more competitive than the general against (perennial loser and hyper-racist vigilante) Curtis Sliwa and whichever dross failed to achieve the backing of one of the parties but are still rich and/or corrupt enough to afford running anyway.

Other than Sliwa, his opponents will be a corrupt as fuck compulsive liar who was probably days from being sentenced to prison when he decided to pledge his allegiance to the Mango Mussolini without joining the GOP, and possibly the sex offender he just beat.

[-] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago

Are we expecting the Democratic party to actually support him? Seems the national leadership would rather see someone else in his spot.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

If he fail because the party do not supporting then those people who keep talking about the lesser of two evil parties are hypocrites and you can say goodbye to the usa improving

[-] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago

I for one am DEFINITELY not, no.

Will be interesting to see what they do tbh, since Cuomo has already lost to him once and the other two candidates are openly sucking up to the Mango Mussolini. Makes endorsing anyone quite the tricky proposition..

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2025
894 points (99.0% liked)

politics

24404 readers
2140 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS