One of the many reasons Oprah sucks.
Nah, she seems sweet
Edit: Amazing how many images of this photo have Weinstein cropped out. I'm sure it's a coincidence
For an indepth review, listen to the Behind The Bastards series on Oprah!
The child molester enabler Oprah Winfrey?
What are you referring to? I searched but didn't find anything.
Behind the Bastards did a several episode series on her. Linked a couple comments up.
Oprah is a media mogul, you don't think she'd surpress bad press or distract with one of her giveaways?
I'll listen to it. I was particularly asking what the "child molester enabler" claim referred to. Maybe I'll find out by listening to several hours of podcasts, but I wondered whether there's a quicker answer.
There is more to her bad behaviour and it needs a fair bit of context.
I am listening to the first episode now.
Well, I wish you luck on this journey.
No surprise there, the guy always has been an asshole and a medical quack
The man's always been scum...
Why the fuck is he there? How is he still relevant?
That's the point. He's not.
The TV star to irrelevant loser to rightwing darling pipeline is real.
They need some way to continue participating in the attention economy.
This is also how we got Tucker Carlson. He's a Swanson, he doesn't need to work, he needs the attention.
I hope he doesn't get injured on live television! /s
hopefully bhad babie is there to cash him ousside
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.