523
submitted 2 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
all 44 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] [email protected] 110 points 2 months ago

My dude, you aren't suing a small blogger, but an evil corporation worth over $1.5 trillion. Aim higher!

[-] [email protected] 105 points 2 months ago

I don't think he needs the money. This seems more like a cut that shit out and start the ball rolling for everyone else to sue.

[-] [email protected] 57 points 2 months ago

He doesn't, but evil corporations only respond to one thing: money.

The more you can take from them, the more it hurts them. They already do it to us, including ripping off his songs, so fight back if you have the money to spend on lawyers!

[-] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago

Yes, a lawsuit, a fine, etc are all "cost of doing business." If it costs a million dollars a year to use eminem's music, but engages 150 million of their 2 billion users into engagement and ad revenue that nets 50 million dollars, it was a very lucrative payment to eminem, and now they will certainly be willing to do the same for other popular artists at that price point.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

Maybe it's just the actual damages.

Suing in America is funny because they always want as much as possible.

[-] [email protected] 82 points 2 months ago

Why is everyone focusing on the number. It's going to set the record that artist's can sue corporate for using their work unfairly.

[-] [email protected] 20 points 2 months ago

I mean, Zuck personally made that much money every 6 minutes last year - when sleeping, eating, basking in the sun on a hot rock...

But the real answer is that the article itself is not good reporting.

Copyright claimants will typically request the statutory wilful infringement amount ($150,000 per work) in the court complaint, but will also have a catch-all for actual damages and profits. Proving that at trial can make this much higher. Some plaintiffs put a $10 million or $100 million or $1 billion number in their documents to make headlines. But this reporter presumably is not familiar with this practice, so is underselling the risk here.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

Been going after individual users long enough I guess

[-] [email protected] 49 points 2 months ago

Wow, a WHOLE million? They're sure to learn their lesson.

/s, just in case.

[-] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago

You dont just get to decide how much to sue for (well, you can try but good luck if there's no base for your number)

[-] [email protected] 46 points 2 months ago

The number is probably set just high enough to force meta to respond with lawyers who have an actual payroll. $1M is nothing, but if they roll over, then every other artist will do the same. Meta will need to fight this in courts. It will cost them money to do so.

Eminem can make an album about it afterwards. And he doesn't look super greedy. And other artists might win because of him.

[-] [email protected] 11 points 2 months ago

It says statutory right in the article. $150k seems like the legal limit per song.

[-] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago

I’d be disappointed if he didn’t make a record after it.

[-] [email protected] 41 points 2 months ago

The article says that Meta claims they got the rights through some third party firm that, his publisher claims had no right to authorize the distribution of their music. If that turns out to be the case, I wonder how many of the other artists that you can choose when you want to make a Reel or whatever also would fall under this same circumstance?

[-] [email protected] 18 points 2 months ago

Hey, you wanna license the Beatles? I'm your guy

$3.50 a pop.

[-] [email protected] 24 points 2 months ago

Well it was about that time that I noticed that the Beetles Agent was about 8 stories tall and a crustacean from the protozoic era

[-] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago

Throw in a couple of Nirvana tracks and you got yourself a deal

[-] [email protected] 27 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Exceed $1 Million

That is effectively pocket change to both parties. This isn't about money, but the legal precedent.

[-] [email protected] 27 points 2 months ago

Meta: "Ooooooh! A whole million dollars!"

[-] [email protected] 21 points 2 months ago

Hell yeah, get their asses Slim!

[-] [email protected] 17 points 2 months ago

I think that's how much Zuckerberg tips the person who washes his testicles for him.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago

Testiclean is a wholly owned subordinate of Meta. He doesn't tip.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

You wouldn't believe how much he pays his taint washer.

[-] [email protected] 17 points 2 months ago
[-] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago

A million.

Cost of doing business for them. They won't even blink.

[-] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago
[-] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago

Is that Eminem Che Guevara?

[-] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago

it's his new look since around 2016ish. I've gotten quite used to it, actually, and I think it fits him quite a bit

[-] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago

If I just saw him out of the corner of my eye, I would think it's actually Justin Timberlake.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

Did he forget how to spell billions?

[-] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago
[-] [email protected] -2 points 2 months ago

He looks fucking weird, is it the plastic surgery?

[-] [email protected] 13 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Nah, it's the weird beard

~this~ ~is~ ~a~ ~reference~

[-] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago

why you yellin at the mic

[-] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago

that's called facial hair.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago

He's a grandfather now, people age. This isn't slim shady

this post was submitted on 04 Jun 2025
523 points (99.6% liked)

Music

9970 readers
144 users here now

↳ Our family Communities:

➰#Music

Music.world - [email protected]

Jazz -[email protected]

Album Art Porn - [email protected]

Fake Album Covers - [email protected]

Obscure Music - [email protected]

Vinyl and LP's - [email protected]

Electronic Dance Music - [email protected]

60's Music - [email protected]

70's Music - [email protected]

80's Music - [email protected]

90's Music - [email protected]

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS