My dude, you aren't suing a small blogger, but an evil corporation worth over $1.5 trillion. Aim higher!
post
Why is everyone focusing on the number. It's going to set the record that artist's can sue corporate for using their work unfairly.
I mean, Zuck personally made that much money every 6 minutes last year - when sleeping, eating, basking in the sun on a hot rock...
But the real answer is that the article itself is not good reporting.
Copyright claimants will typically request the statutory wilful infringement amount ($150,000 per work) in the court complaint, but will also have a catch-all for actual damages and profits. Proving that at trial can make this much higher. Some plaintiffs put a $10 million or $100 million or $1 billion number in their documents to make headlines. But this reporter presumably is not familiar with this practice, so is underselling the risk here.
Why is everyone focusing on the number.
Because this is Lemmy. Any actual action that harms the corporations must be mocked and dismissed. Only empty posturing and Internet-tough-guy-ism is allowed.
Wow, a WHOLE million? They're sure to learn their lesson.
/s, just in case.
The number is probably set just high enough to force meta to respond with lawyers who have an actual payroll. $1M is nothing, but if they roll over, then every other artist will do the same. Meta will need to fight this in courts. It will cost them money to do so.
Eminem can make an album about it afterwards. And he doesn't look super greedy. And other artists might win because of him.
The article says that Meta claims they got the rights through some third party firm that, his publisher claims had no right to authorize the distribution of their music. If that turns out to be the case, I wonder how many of the other artists that you can choose when you want to make a Reel or whatever also would fall under this same circumstance?
Hey, you wanna license the Beatles? I'm your guy
$3.50 a pop.
Exceed $1 Million
That is effectively pocket change to both parties. This isn't about money, but the legal precedent.
I think that's how much Zuckerberg tips the person who washes his testicles for him.
Is that Eminem Che Guevara?
it's his new look since around 2016ish. I've gotten quite used to it, actually, and I think it fits him quite a bit
He looks fucking weird, is it the plastic surgery?
Nah, it's the weird beard
this is a reference
I mean fuck Facebook and all, but this isn't a good thing. Music is free, rich people are stupid.
Yeah, so I guess we'll just let the multi billion dollar corporation continue profiting off of others work without any sort of pushback right?
You're like this close to sounding like a dumb anarcho-capitalist.
Says someone who's never made their own music in their life.


all 44 comments