45
submitted 2 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] [email protected] 22 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

All reactionaries are paper tigers. In appearance, the reactionaries are terrifying, but in reality, they are not so powerful. From a long-term point of view, it is not the reactionaries but the people who are powerful.

[-] [email protected] 14 points 2 days ago

Easy read summary

spoilerEasy read summary

America’s Military Humiliation

Trump wearing headphones getting reports on the operation

When, in reaction to the war in Gaza, the Houthis of Yemen started imposing their blockade on the Red Sea, it was seen as a sure sign of waning American power: a global hegemon was allowing its control over a vital sea route to be contested.

And so, in January 2024, Operation Poseidon Archer was launched, which involved British as well as American aircraft trying to bomb the Houthis into submission.

The operation was unsuccessful, doing almost nothing to dent Houthi attacks or open up the Red Sea to shipping.

Operation Poseidon Archer was followed by Operation Rough Rider, in March of this year, which tried to show a new, much more muscular American military response against Houthi targets in Yemen — for all of six weeks.

US warplanes pounded Yemen around the clock, with rare and expensive stealth bombers flying missions out of Diego Garcia in support of carrier-based aircraft.

This was trumpeted as a beautiful victory for the US military, with the Houthis finally promising to not attack US ships anymore, and America kindly returning the gesture.

The Houthis only had to stop attacking American ships in exchange for America stopping the bombing; they were free to continue preventing access the Red Sea or firing missiles at Israel.

Trump’s Operation Rough Rider, unlike Biden’s operations, utilised many of America’s most limited, expensive, and advanced weapons to try to bring the Houthis to heel.

But the US has no alternative modes of warfare to fall back on, which means that its days as a military hegemon are probably coming to a close.

To understand just how big a mess the air war against the Houthis has turned out to be, it’s important to understand a very basic rule to US military inventories.

For while, on paper, America has 11 nuclear-powered aircraft carriers, an impressive figure that far outstrips any other country on the planet, that top line figure is barely relevant in practice.

The UK has two large aircraft carriers, putting it near the top of the international leaderboard when it comes to the ability to project military force.

The number of carriers the UK can actually send out and use is far lower, a number which is fairly close to zero.

For while the ships exist, the Royal Navy doesn't have the crew, the planes, the escorts, and the organizational ability to actually put them to use for any length of time in a real war.

Though the situation for the US Navy isn't quite as terrible and serious, in practice, the problem is the same: it cannot realistically put more than two to four carriers to sea at any given moment.

B-2 stealth bomber

For Operation Rough Rider, the US Air Force added some six B-2 Spirit stealth bombers, many would say the most advanced (and by far the most expensive) airframe in the US storehouse of weapons.

But a closer look at these planes suggest that those six used in Rough Rider very likely represent the whole list of working US stealth bombers.

Only half of US bombers even qualify for what’s called "mission capable" status on an average day, a status which doesn't actually mean that the plane works; it simply means the plane isn't completely broken.

“Full mission capable” is your standard Pentagon-speak; it means the plane is in working order, has nothing broken that’s really important, and can realistically be used for what it was built for.

America basically pulled out all the stops to attack the Houthis.

Fighting a very expensive and intensive air war against a group of armed citizens controlling most of Yemen, the fourth-poorest nation in the world.

The cost to operate a B-2 stealth bomber is very high on a per-hour basis; and their delicate stealth coating is not particularly especially of the warm, salty sea air at Diego Garcia.

America also committed roughly half of its active carriers, spent a fortune in land attack and air defence missiles, and it even cannibalised ammo stores and air defence systems from the Pacific theatre of operations for the benefit of the operation.

The US couldn’t establish air supremacy, meaning it couldn’t risk flying its older, non-stealth planes for fear of losing them.

This is not a problem of weakness or fear, but of force generation: even if the US military suffers zero losses due to enemy fire in the years ahead, scheduled to shrink steeply and dangerously.

This shrinkage and loss of capacity is just due to America’s planes and ships wearing out, with not enough workers, dockyards, engineers, and dollars to replace them.

The result of this American Achilles’ heel has been an very expensive reliance — when it has come to defending the Red Sea what’s commonly called “standoff” weaponry.

F-35 stealth bomber

But even then, there were problems: according to leaked reports, even the well respected F-35 stealth fighter had to avoid incoming anti-air missiles on at least one occasion.

In Operation Rough Rider, the US sent out and used many of its most rare and custom-made weapons, such as the AGM-158 JASSM (Joint Air-To-Surface Standoff Missile) as well as heavy, specialised bunker-buster bombs.

Trump could have sent another carrier to the area in support of his operation, bringing the total up to three.

But this would hardly have made much difference to the air campaign because the problem with this offensive wasn’t lack of deck space or fighter sorties.

US planes were too wary to go anywhere near Yemen’s air defence, and even stealth jets were according to reports not completely safe.

Operation Rough Rider was supposed to be a clear show of force against an under-prepared, internally divided third-world nation.

Instead, it ended up looking like the last hurrah of a truly old and useless form of warfare, unable to successfully deal with cheaper and better anti-air weapon systems.

Iran is far bigger than Yemen, with a much more strong air defence network.

The critical parts of Iran’s nuclear programme are kept under hundreds of feet of solid mountain.

The US, using the heaviest and most advanced weapons in its whole arsenal, did not succeed against the much shallower Houthi bunkers and missile storage facilities in Yemen.

All of the problems that forced America’s tacit surrender of the Suez canal would be large and be far more deadly in any action against Iran.

With exploding deficits, a growing internal political problem, and a slowly collapsing military, America is a leopard that doesn't have the ability to even attempt to change its spots.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

their delicate stealth coating is not particularly especially of the warm, salty sea air

Four decades and they've still got problems with the stealth coating

[-] [email protected] 14 points 2 days ago

I don't use UnHerd but had it in my head it was extremely right wing. Is this not unusual content for them to be putting out? They're owned by and run by Tories and fascists, specifically the same people that invested in GBNews.

[-] [email protected] 9 points 2 days ago

I find they tend to be left leaning for the most part, and they regularly platform people like Varoufakis.

[-] [email protected] 17 points 2 days ago

UnHerd was founded in 2017 by the hedge fund manager Paul Marshall as its owner and publisher and conservative British political activist Tim Montgomerie as its editor.[1][2][3][4] Marshall has invested over £50m in GB News; UnHerd's marketing describes it as a website for "people who dare to think for themselves."[5]

hmmm

Following Montgomerie's departure in September 2018,[11] journalist Sally Chatterton, who previously wrote for The Daily Telegraph and The Independent, took over as editor.[12][8]

Torygraph...

In January 2023, former Politico and The Atlantic writer Tom McTague was hired as UnHerd's political editor.[15]

Samuel Earle, writing in The Guardian, described UnHerd in 2023 as "drifting away from explicit concern for the Conservative Party and the future of capitalism, and towards a focus on culture war topics: lockdowns, wokeness, cancel culture and the trans rights movement, as well as more general journalistic fare."

I'm not saying don't use it at all. Just keep in mind who they are and that they're working some far right angle even when it appears to not be doing that.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago

Sure, I'm just going by the articles they platform which on the whole do seem sober, and a lot of time come from people on the left including actual Marxists like the author of this article.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

Well the whole article could be read as an argument for more military funding.

[-] [email protected] 12 points 2 days ago
[-] [email protected] 11 points 2 days ago

Hey!

No kink shaming.

[-] [email protected] 9 points 2 days ago

It's a privatized mercenary force for the super wealthy and a make work program for middle class dropouts

Even it's special forces is mistrained and miseducated by tacticool, alpha dog, meat diet frat boy grifter bullshit

[-] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

UnHerd? More like UnHeard cuz I ain't reading all that shit from a reactionary rag.

[-] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago

the article is written by a literal Marxist, refusing to read things because they're printed on a particular site is the most lib behavior ever

[-] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Even if it wasn't written by a Marxist, the analysis itself is solid and that's what matters.

Some people on the left seem to have this weird hangup where they believe that they will become morally tainted by coming into the slightest contact with something that touched a reactionary, like a germophobe not wanting to touch things other people have touched for fear of catching their diseases, but for politics.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

Exactly. Good analysis comes from diverse sources, and limiting yourself to people you already agree with is a fast track to an information bubble detached from reality. There’s another benefit to exposing yourself to diverse sources as well. Engaging with ideas you disagree with forces you to test your own beliefs. When you encounter opposing views, ask yourself why you disagree. Working through that tension will expose weak points in your own thinking, and doing so sharpens your understanding going forward.

this post was submitted on 31 May 2025
45 points (95.9% liked)

news

24072 readers
705 users here now

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --

-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --

-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today/ . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --

-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--

-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--

-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --

-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS