95
submitted 1 week ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] [email protected] 78 points 1 week ago

Keep men, lose land; land can be taken again. Keep land, lose men; land and men are both lost.

Libs thought Ukraine was winning because Russia wasn't gaining ground. It never occurred to them that Russia's strategy has been to deplete Ukraine's strength until they can take as much as they please.

[-] [email protected] 46 points 1 week ago

Well how could they conceive of that when in their world Ukraine hasn't suffered a single casualty

[-] [email protected] 42 points 1 week ago

It is just a month ago I read a dead serious article about Russia now being so short of vehicles that they were riding donkeys and camels into battle.

[-] [email protected] 42 points 1 week ago

Before this war I genuinely believed no one could be stupid enough to believe this level of nonsense; the last few years have been particularly illuminating.

[-] [email protected] 21 points 1 week ago

Me five years ago: "thank god we have the internet now, and the ability of people to talk with others on the other side of the Earth makes them much less likely to swallow nationalist war propaganda"

Me now: "half of European citizens are fascist white supremacists and at the very least need years worth of reeducation"

[-] [email protected] 17 points 1 week ago

Up til now it has been thought that the growth of Christian myths during the Roman Empire was possible only because printing was not yet invented. Precisely the contrary. The daily press and the telegraph, which in a moment spreads inventions over the whole Earth, fabricates more myths (and the bourgeoise cattle believe and enlarge upon them) in one day than could have formerly been done in a century.

marx speech-l

[-] [email protected] 32 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Saw somebody say that an explosio in a shopping center in Poland was set by russia to harm the Polish economy and just like... Why? What would be the point of taking an insane risk lile this for the .0000000001% of the economy that any given shopping center provides?

Or the severed communications line line in the baltic. How would that serve any Russian objective (later it was found a civilian vessel dragged an anchor).

Abducting 700,000 kids and rehoming them, or alternately, deporting 700,000 kids. Why? That costs money? What do they stand to gain materially from that?" They'll say it's genocide, but unlike Israel, there isn't any record of Russian officials or church leaders or even a popular front calling for Ukranian genociding. Then these motherfuckers have the gall to accuse us of conspiracy theories.

The media has successfully convinced them to turn off their brains regarding this

[-] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago

Yea i mean Russia was just doing human wave attacks of unarmed people who had never seen a toilet according to reddit.

I don't understand what the problem is.

[-] [email protected] 45 points 1 week ago

To be fair to them, we haven't seen an attritional war strategy enacted since probably Vietnam, and never an attritional war strategy by near peer adversaries in the 21st century.

But on the other hand, all late game TvT ends up becoming attritional, with the player who is most able to efficiently use resources usually winning. Map painting rarely wins you the game unless you are being precise and strategic in what is being painted and where. I distinctly remember calling this strategy when Russia retreated over the river in the South saying that while it was a political disaster, it was absolutely the best military strategic move if the point was to grind down a weaker opponent. Make them take and hold the strategically useless, but politically important land. I was told I was 'coping'.

[-] [email protected] 23 points 1 week ago
[-] [email protected] 31 points 1 week ago

Terran v.s. Terran in StarCraft 2. Basically the closest equivalent you can get to what mass simulated battles, where resources are gained and expended rapidly from a commander standpoint, look like. The second closest equivalent would be Squad, but there is no resource extraction backline aspect to the game, it is still too focused on individual combat encounters deciding outcomes.

You could also argue that "Foxhole" is actually the best milsim equivalent, but those games move too slowly to analogize for non-gamers, you might as well be watching an actual war unfold, plus there is a whole 'teching' aspect that doesn't actually apply irl, nor aircraft or drone warfare, which is the most prominent aspect of the Ukraine-Russian conflict.

The point is that there are plenty of modern war gaming examples that explain why near-peer conflicts will inevitably turn towards an attritional strategy, and that taking land simply to take it is a terrible strategy.

[-] [email protected] 18 points 1 week ago

Ah, okay. Thanks!

[-] [email protected] 17 points 1 week ago

Terran vs Terran (StarCraft match-up)

[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

The Vapid Turks

[-] [email protected] 15 points 1 week ago

To be fair to them, we haven't seen an attritional war strategy enacted since probably Vietnam,

Wasn't the Syrian Civil war several years of attrition before the rebel coalition mostly collapsed (in the first half)?

[-] [email protected] 15 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Yeah, but that was far more asymmetrical, especially from the U.S. side, where we were mostly drone striking non-cooperative entities and funding cooperative entities to undermine the legitimacy of the Syrian government. From the Syrian side it was attritional, and their strategy worked until they ran out of money to maintain the standing army to the degree needed to keep out a fully funded and backed by Turkish-Isreali funded force, and then were completely obliterated by the Israeli Air Force. Which isn't going to happen to Russia, but could possibly happen to Ukraine, but the effects will be different.

[-] [email protected] 59 points 1 week ago

The European Union continues to make no diplomatic efforts to find an end to the war, as chief diplomat Kaja Kallas wrote today that the “longer Russia wages war, the tougher our (sanctions) response.”

How are they still threatening someone with sanctions after already doing 17 rounds of it? i-cant Everthing that can damage the Russian war economy has already been done at this point, but I guess they're gonna be real scared when they read about that 18th sanction package.

[-] [email protected] 39 points 1 week ago

It really is incredible isn't it. These people just keep trying the same thing, that's been hurting them far more than Russia, and they're literally unable to think of anything else to do.

[-] [email protected] 39 points 1 week ago

I'd like to see ol' Putin wriggle his way out of THIS jam!

[-] [email protected] 19 points 1 week ago

Narrator: He did.

[-] [email protected] 13 points 1 week ago

I love how after Months of extensive talks all Euros can come up with is more sanctions.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

The fact that this Estonian ghoul is the "chief diplomat" is such a tell.

[-] [email protected] 46 points 1 week ago

At this point I pretty strongly believe that total collapse and occupation by Russia would be far and away the best outcome for most Ukrainians

[-] [email protected] 35 points 1 week ago

Its the best outcome for the world too, we don't need a western rump Ukraine for the EU/US to pump full of weapons and create a flashpoint

[-] [email protected] 21 points 1 week ago

Ok but what if rump Ukrainian state backed by EU/US that turns on the EU/US?

[-] [email protected] 21 points 1 week ago
[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

I found a YouTube link in your comment. Here are links to the same video on alternative frontends that protect your privacy:

[-] [email protected] 16 points 1 week ago

Blowback Season 7 hell yeah

[-] [email protected] 30 points 1 week ago

Not exactly sure about that, there's going to be a substantial insurgency either way.

[-] [email protected] 37 points 1 week ago

Yeah, either way. The best outcome for Ukraine would’ve been to tell the west to kick rocks in like 2013, not done ethnic cleansing, and not gotten into this situation in the first place.

But now the best outcome is anything that ends the war with the least amount of control by the United States.

[-] [email protected] 22 points 1 week ago

In the west, which I doubt russia will occupy. Central and Eastern Ukraine will be no issue.

[-] [email protected] 22 points 1 week ago

There will definitely be an insurgency but I'm not sure it's going to be as powerful as many think. With the losses Ukraine has suffered, there won't be a huge reserve of people willing and able to carry it out, similar to how there was very little Nazi insurgent activity after the end of the war because most of the true believers with military experience had been killed by that point. This is probably an additional reason as to why Russia is carrying out its attritional strategy, as it partially defangs the inevitable insurgency. But I suppose the counter to my argument is that a Ukrainian insurgency would almost certainly have Western intelligence backing, whereas the Nazi's Werwolf was an anemic project from the outset with no outside backing.

[-] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

That and all the skilled nazis got hired by the us and nato for reasons. When the nazis stayed in power in lots of places there was not a practical need for them to have an insurgency in that way.

[-] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago

Good point, I definitely overlooked that. I also forgot to mention for comparison that one of the reasons why the Iraqi insurgency was so strong was because the Iraqi military wasn't destroyed (at least manpower-wise) in the US invasion, which allowed huge swathes of Iraqi soldiers to become insurgents.

[-] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago

I have to remember to think about it myself. That lifetime of propaganda sits in sometimes.

[-] [email protected] 12 points 1 week ago

You strongly believe Russia should occupy the parts of Ukraine that are majority Ukrainian? Why?

[-] [email protected] 40 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

This is a country that was already not wealthy to begin with, which will have to deal with the devastation caused by the war, with the remains of a military increasingly run by card-carrying neo nazis and with having lost an entire generation of men. And if that wasn't enough, Ukraine has already agreed to let Western capital loot the country and strip it for parts the second the war is over, like the extortion deal they signed with the US. Even if Putin were to sign an unconditional ceasefire tomorrow and retreat from every occupied territory, Ukraine would be absolutely and completely fucked.

Those territories becoming part of Russia would cause its own share of problems, sure, but I can see how Russia would be more capable of rebuilding and maintaining at least a minimum of stability.

[-] [email protected] 24 points 1 week ago

Couldn’t have said it better

[-] [email protected] 28 points 1 week ago

The Ukrainians built their national identity around worshiping a Nazi-collaborating pogromist. I hardly think Russia could make the place worse.

[-] [email protected] 46 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Ultimately the fault of the nationalist ukranian elite and the west for letting it get to this, they could've given ukraine an easier out right after the war began but now it's gonna pay the price for giving russia a bloody nose and get basically no meaningful reward

[-] [email protected] 40 points 1 week ago

If they accepted minsk 2.0 then they would have just lost crimea. But greed and chauvinism was stronger - and so a million Ukrainians were sacrified at the altar

[-] [email protected] 29 points 1 week ago

I thought the military tap was back on after Trump made the "loot all natural resources" deal. Does someone need this? fell-for-it-again-award

[-] [email protected] 19 points 1 week ago

The natural resources deal is meaningless if Ukraine neither wins nor makes peace. And it is impossible for it to win.

Therefore, Trump's victory condition is peace.

[-] [email protected] 22 points 1 week ago

Darn. Oh noes! Shucks!

[-] [email protected] 19 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

the translator they brought to the second Istanbul talks , immidiatly defected and then they had a parade in london with some ukrainians and they all also defected , i think we in the end phase.

[-] [email protected] 14 points 1 week ago

that's incredible, everybody there must know the gig is up

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

That link is just to a video of a march? there is no mention of defection

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I found a YouTube link in your comment. Here are links to the same video on alternative frontends that protect your privacy:

[-] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

but NAFO nerds told me that russia would take 112 years to take Ukraine???

this post was submitted on 22 May 2025
95 points (96.1% liked)

news

24068 readers
681 users here now

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --

-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --

-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today/ . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --

-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--

-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--

-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --

-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS