this post was submitted on 07 May 2025
180 points (94.6% liked)

News

29268 readers
4282 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 46 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago

70,000 is just a starting point for negotiation, she counters with zero then they settle on 7,000 and both walk away with a win.

[–] [email protected] 83 points 2 days ago (1 children)

TLDR:

30 cases, $4,000.

She got her money back after making a stink in the media.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don’t think that company regularly gets orders that big, do they? Maybe when getting a large order, they should contact the buyer to confirm it.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 day ago

Two thoughts on why it didn't get flagged

  1. the seller might be used to selling bulk amounts to distributors so 30 cases isn't unheard of.

  2. Since it was on Amazon, there might not have actually been a human in the loop (except the person who packaged it but its not on them to check stuff like that) until the package actually arrives

But idk, I just skimmed the article lol

[–] [email protected] 34 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

IDK what the fuck kind of settings people have on their phones to allow anyone with access to it to do that?
Any action that requires a payment or money transfer on my phone also requires authentication, and I'm not even sure I can disable that.
But maybe that's because I'm in EU?

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Imagine having 4000 of available credit in this economy

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm a solidly middle class and have 10x that. My mother, who is lower middle class, has more than me. It's not a question of economy, it's about being responsible and old enough to build up a favorable history.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

Be rich, don't be poor got it. I'm gonna follow you for more financial tips.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 hours ago

We've lowered the bar so far that middle class is considered rich now?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (2 children)

My mother raised me alone barely scraping by. I was a free lunch kid. If it wasn't for social security payments from my dead father we would have been homeless. So how about you go fuck yourself. Cause I don't wanna hear "wah it's so hard being millennial" from some dickhead who almost certainly came from more privilege than me.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

You're being totally real and reasonable. Not sure why you're getting any pushback on this. $40k in available credit is doable by having a few cards open, and anyone who has a history of paying on time should have no difficulty being approved.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 hours ago

I looked at that person's post history. They used to play a Sega game gear while waiting in line at universal studios. We couldn't even afford the batteries for a game gear. They had every advantage that I didn't. If they can't get a credit card, it's not because the economy is shit. It's because they're stupid and wasted their opportunities.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Start out mega poor but get rich later.

Got it.

The hits keep coming with this guy.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 hours ago

Better than "start out with every advantage, fuck it up, and blame the state of the world that you don't have an average adult's credit rating"

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

But maybe that's because I'm in EU?

~~Enabled by default as far as I can tell.~~ I don't know anyone whose kid has done something like this and there's no way none of them tried.

Nevermind, I see that it was Amazon so I went and checked the app (not a frequent Amazon shopper). No verification, you can just click Buy Now

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

No verification, you can just click Buy Now

I don't think that's possible here, Are you in USA? IDK if it's EU or because I'm in Denmark.
We had it some years back, but our available payments systems have increased security since.
I don't think it's a good idea to have purchases drawn from you account with no security. And I don't think it should be legal.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Do you have confirmation if you put in your card number? If yes, that's good, but I also don't think that's a EU-wide thing.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Do you have confirmation if you put in your card number?

They can store the card info, but we need to confirm purchases with an SMS code.

I also don’t think that’s a EU-wide thing.

No apparently it isn't, I got a response from a German who says they can buy on Amazon without security validation.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago

Yes, USA. I was thinking of Google Play purchases when I first left the comment (which definitely has confirmation)

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It's Denmark. I live in Germany and Amazon doesn't require authentication when buying something. Maybe I turned it off at some point but I doubt it

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

OK then it's our payment systems that don't allow it. Probably by law?
When you cross the Great Belt toll bridge in Denmark, you can pay with the universal "Dankort" without authentication, but they have a special permission/agreement for that.
I don't use Amazon, but on Steam we used to be able to make unauthorized payments, but that is not possible anymore last I tried.
I actually considered trying it to see for sure, but I can't think of anything worthwhile to buy right now.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 2 days ago (1 children)

LaFavers said she was changing some settings on her phone to make sure there's never another surprise ~~delivery~~ candy crush at home.

C'mon guys, that joke was easier than taking credit card information from a single parent

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

LaFavers doesn’t want her kid doing the favors for other kids.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Jesus, how many friends does this fucking kid have?

[–] [email protected] 27 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Or none because he didn’t follow through.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah, I was thinking kids young enough to do this are young enough to hate the disappointment more than respect the effort.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

At least they aren’t blaming the immigrants for no candy

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 days ago (4 children)

there should be a regulation that businesses who sell to minors over the internet are liable for the mistake. They're the ones who benefit from such easy ordering, and this is a foreseeable consequence of that.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

They didn't know they were selling to a minor. He used his mother's phone. It's right there in the headline.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

There should be a regulation that if you don't secure a device that is later used in a way you don't want because of lack of said security, you are shit out of luck. - ftfy

It's not the fault of the business because your pin code is 1234 (or non-existent). People need to figure shit out. If a child grabs your car keys and then crashes the family sedan, it's not Toyota's fault; same thing.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That's just asking to have online shopping become much harder, requiring more identity verification than just having a credit card and an address. Which is maybe beneficial overall; it would cut down on fraud, but I doubt it would be a popular change.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

I'm honestly pro-anything-that-reduces-consumption. This would reduce consumption because it would make people consider their purchases more.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 days ago

How? For all they know the mother bought them. That's what the billing and shipping info says.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago (3 children)

but that's all he gets to eat until he finishes them

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago

Per my quick research, 1 Dum Dum is about 25 calories, if we assume he eats 1500 calories per day, he'd die of malnutrition before he finished eating them over 3 years.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

Lisa needs braces

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago

Kid's been brought up right, sharing with his friends. Very kind

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

ABC couldn’t just have said “found herself in a tough spot”, absolutely had to shoehorn “sticky” in with a pile driver

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Attempting to not say sticky in an article about candy?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago (2 children)

The story isn't finished!

Did the kid end up having his sucky carnival‽

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

I don't like this sentence.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago