Addicted to losing
this post was submitted on 05 May 2025
147 points (96.2% liked)
Slop.
488 readers
404 users here now
For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.
Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.
Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.
Rule 3: No sectarianism.
Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome
Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.
Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.
Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.
Rule 8: Do not post public figures, these should be posted to c/gossip
founded 5 months ago
MODERATORS
Controlled opposition alright
lol do it. she will eat shit even harder
awesome. hope she loses again
she would eat shit in primary tbh (if it happens)
Last one that wasn’t a proven sham was in what, 2008? Not holding my breath for Dems to be democratic any time soon.
-- and the fact that she literally did nothing to stop a genocide won't factor into it at all.
More then that, she actively supported a genocide
She was the second highest ranking us official during the start of the recent gaza genocide. She was already an accomplish when she ran for president.
Yup somehow that's still our fault.
Watching liberals barely contain their glee about what's happening so they can say "we told you so" even though nobody thought they wouldn't do that has really reaffirmed my belief it was the right move.
load more comments
(1 replies)
HAHAHAHAHHAHA IT WAS A DEBATE! IT WAS A DEBATE! AND THERE WERE JOURNALISTS THERE COVERING THE DEBATE. AND IN A DEBATE WHEN YOUR OPPONENT FOUGHT FOR SEGREGATION YOU CAN'T WIN THE RACISTS OVER. SO YOU PRETEND TO BE SLIGHTLY LESS RACIST
I'm not against her specifically. I'm against her nonsense DNC appointed policy. Running to the right had never once been a winning strategy. The entire Schumer Strategy is a unmitigated failure.
Run on progressive policy and you cannot lose. It took the entire Democratic machine to stop Sanders.
The DNC is a Corporation. It's full name as shown in court documents is the DNC Services Corp. They are controlled opposition. If they lose, it's because they chose to. It is a conscious decision on their part. They have the numbers. The analytics. The polling. They know how to win. They know how to keep control indefinitely and they actively choose not to because their own interests as a corporation line up with republican fiscal policy. Tax cuts and empire. Those are the frontline policies that matter to them. It's why they appear toothless. It's why Schumer is sending "strongly worded" letters to Chump instead of rallying democrats to play hardball. It's why they're all desperate to stop David Hogg from going after those do nothing democrats.
I'm not against her specifically.
Why not? Her history as DA and AG is terrible, even if her policies weren't outright absurd she's proven herself to be irredeemable and untrustworthy.
load more comments
(2 replies)
The dems will run Harris because they want to lose in order for them to not be at the helm for WW3.
Democrats will do literally anything other than demand that the genocide end.
I'm starting to wonder if they ran her in 2024 because they wanted to not be at the helm of the continuing genocide
That would be more plausible if chuck and others weren't out saying they were just in power to make Israel look good/do PR
“The expansion of Israel and its proxies are a fundamental necessity for the United States”
- Tim Walz during the VP debate
They Learned a LOT! AND if you Donate a Couple more Dollars they'll Learn even MORE!
This is facebook tier boomer rage bait material
you don't understand having a strong and lethal military is the cornerstone of right and left wing ideologies
Someone arguing about how she lost when pointing out she ran on a mostly gop lite platform
Deeply unserious
Is this satire, please tell me it is satire. Do they want to lose?
Surprised tbh I was expecting them to run a blue dog. Pull in a "moderate" Republican and try that instead. We'll see maybe they still do that
Harris ran her campaign like she was one (tough on immigration, tough on crime, bringing out neocons like Cheney)
Maybe they'll just have her completely abandon any sort of pretensions of not being a fascist monster
Her parading the Cheney endorsement weeks before the election will be memory holed by Dems
my favorite was bringing Bill Clinton to Michigan to tell Arab Americans that their relatives in Palestine deserved to die
Not only that, he specifically referenced that God promised the land to the Israelites in the Bible, which was why it was okay that these people had their relatives murdered in various refugee camps.
Shocking loss in Michigan
They'll 86 the impassioned speech about abortion this time around.
Probably means no candidate like Tim Walz to make it seem like she’s even moderately left-leaning
Which is really sad because tim walz was such a 
ass candidate who still had very bad opinions.
I only saw him talk once and he was comparing Trump to the "old man yells at cloud" Simpsons meme and I was like "you're literally an old man and your entire campaign is yelling at clouds!!!!" 
load more comments
(1 replies)
No. She CANNOT win.
view more: next ›