149
submitted 2 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] [email protected] 64 points 2 months ago

Unless they just decide not to run primaries there's no shot. She couldn't even win her home state last time and dropped out to save herself the embarrassment

[-] [email protected] 46 points 2 months ago

straight up dropped the day before California's deadline to have your name removed from the ballot

[-] [email protected] 28 points 2 months ago

Damn I didn't remember it was that blatant lmao

[-] [email protected] 34 points 2 months ago

Unless they just decide not to run primaries

... Again

[-] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago

"This is a time of crisis! Trump is in the white house and making a mockery of our democracy! So in order to push for unity and for the defense of American democracy we have decided to not run any potentially divisive primaries."

[-] [email protected] 17 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Maybe she can put out another staged video of Obama talking down to black men for not wanting to vote for her.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] [email protected] 56 points 2 months ago

lol do it. she will eat shit even harder

[-] [email protected] 49 points 2 months ago

-- and the fact that she literally did nothing to stop a genocide won't factor into it at all.

[-] [email protected] 34 points 2 months ago

More then that, she actively supported a genocide

[-] [email protected] 24 points 2 months ago

She was the second highest ranking us official during the start of the recent gaza genocide. She was already an accomplish when she ran for president.

[-] [email protected] 17 points 2 months ago

Yup somehow that's still our fault.

Watching liberals barely contain their glee about what's happening so they can say "we told you so" even though nobody thought they wouldn't do that has really reaffirmed my belief it was the right move.

[-] [email protected] 49 points 2 months ago

awesome. hope she loses again

[-] [email protected] 31 points 2 months ago

she would eat shit in primary tbh (if it happens)

[-] [email protected] 17 points 2 months ago

Last one that wasn’t a proven sham was in what, 2008? Not holding my breath for Dems to be democratic any time soon.

[-] [email protected] 41 points 2 months ago

I'm not against her specifically. I'm against her nonsense DNC appointed policy. Running to the right had never once been a winning strategy. The entire Schumer Strategy is a unmitigated failure.

Run on progressive policy and you cannot lose. It took the entire Democratic machine to stop Sanders.

The DNC is a Corporation. It's full name as shown in court documents is the DNC Services Corp. They are controlled opposition. If they lose, it's because they chose to. It is a conscious decision on their part. They have the numbers. The analytics. The polling. They know how to win. They know how to keep control indefinitely and they actively choose not to because their own interests as a corporation line up with republican fiscal policy. Tax cuts and empire. Those are the frontline policies that matter to them. It's why they appear toothless. It's why Schumer is sending "strongly worded" letters to Chump instead of rallying democrats to play hardball. It's why they're all desperate to stop David Hogg from going after those do nothing democrats.

[-] [email protected] 62 points 2 months ago

I'm not against her specifically.

Why not? Her history as DA and AG is terrible, even if her policies weren't outright absurd she's proven herself to be irredeemable and untrustworthy.

[-] [email protected] 36 points 2 months ago

Given the pool of candidates the dems want to draw from, is irredeemable and untrustworthy really all that specific?

[-] [email protected] 24 points 2 months ago

No. Not in the slightest.

[-] [email protected] 40 points 2 months ago
[-] [email protected] 37 points 2 months ago

The dems will run Harris because they want to lose in order for them to not be at the helm for WW3.

[-] [email protected] 31 points 2 months ago

Democrats will do literally anything other than demand that the genocide end.

[-] [email protected] 29 points 2 months ago

I'm starting to wonder if they ran her in 2024 because they wanted to not be at the helm of the continuing genocide

[-] [email protected] 24 points 2 months ago

That would be more plausible if chuck and others weren't out saying they were just in power to make Israel look good/do PR

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 36 points 2 months ago

They Learned a LOT! AND if you Donate a Couple more Dollars they'll Learn even MORE!

[-] [email protected] 36 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

This is facebook tier boomer rage bait material

[-] [email protected] 34 points 2 months ago

HAHAHAHAHHAHA IT WAS A DEBATE! IT WAS A DEBATE! AND THERE WERE JOURNALISTS THERE COVERING THE DEBATE. AND IN A DEBATE WHEN YOUR OPPONENT FOUGHT FOR SEGREGATION YOU CAN'T WIN THE RACISTS OVER. SO YOU PRETEND TO BE SLIGHTLY LESS RACIST

[-] [email protected] 27 points 2 months ago

you don't understand having a strong and lethal military is the cornerstone of right and left wing ideologies

Someone arguing about how she lost when pointing out she ran on a mostly gop lite platform

[-] [email protected] 26 points 2 months ago

Deeply unserious

[-] [email protected] 25 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Is this satire, please tell me it is satire. Do they want to lose?

[-] [email protected] 21 points 2 months ago

Surprised tbh I was expecting them to run a blue dog. Pull in a "moderate" Republican and try that instead. We'll see maybe they still do that

[-] [email protected] 32 points 2 months ago

Harris ran her campaign like she was one (tough on immigration, tough on crime, bringing out neocons like Cheney)

Maybe they'll just have her completely abandon any sort of pretensions of not being a fascist monster

[-] [email protected] 24 points 2 months ago

Her parading the Cheney endorsement weeks before the election will be memory holed by Dems

[-] [email protected] 32 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

my favorite was bringing Bill Clinton to Michigan to tell Arab Americans that their relatives in Palestine deserved to die

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] [email protected] 14 points 2 months ago

They'll 86 the impassioned speech about abortion this time around.

[-] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago

Probably means no candidate like Tim Walz to make it seem like she’s even moderately left-leaning

[-] [email protected] 13 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Which is really sad because tim walz was such a fellow-kids ass candidate who still had very bad opinions.

I only saw him talk once and he was comparing Trump to the "old man yells at cloud" Simpsons meme and I was like "you're literally an old man and your entire campaign is yelling at clouds!!!!" matt-jokerfied

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 20 points 2 months ago
[-] [email protected] 14 points 2 months ago
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 05 May 2025
149 points (96.3% liked)

Slop.

567 readers
432 users here now

For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

Rule 8: Do not post public figures, these should be posted to c/El Chisme

founded 8 months ago
MODERATORS