this post was submitted on 13 Apr 2025
159 points (99.4% liked)

News

28956 readers
4478 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Expected this to be the typical small private single engine plane. Interesting it was a double engine, I'd expect that to be safer on the options of private plane and not see this.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Twins are safer in theory but with caveats, mostly to do with pilots putting too much trust in that sense of security. A twin with one engine out has serious differential thrust that needs to be managed, and significantly reduced climb rate that can easily catch the pilot off guard. Pilots can get into an unrecoverable situation thinking that they're still airworthy, whereas in a single when the engine starts sputtering you immediately are looking for a place to put the plane down.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Ah that makes sense. So if this was a hypothetical one engine out situation, maybe they thought they could get somewhere specific safely instead of doing an emergency landing right then and there and then overestimated their ability to manage a 1 engine out.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

I would think that regulations state to set down as soon as possible, but maybe with smaller private planes it's different.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Aren't those things from the 60s?

I get nervous when I'm on a Boeing or a MD from the 90s, Im amazed a plane that old still has enough working components

Or had at least

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago

Airplanes have very particular maintenance schedules. Some things are based on the amount of hours flown, others are calendar items on a set schedule. They are also periodically stripped down completely to check every last part.

Basically, every critical component on it will have been recently replaced, overhauled or checked. If done correctly, a 50 year old plane is not inherently more dangerous because of its age. The caveat to that being: if it’s done properly.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

You think that 727 you flew in last was built in the 90s? Heh, you don't want to know how old they are. I'll just say this, those passenger jets cost millions of dollars and airlines don't like to throw things out. Ever.

A private twin engine plane could literally be built any time in the last 50 years, could be brand new too. That doesn't mean it isn't airworthy though, being old wouldn't make it unreliable.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

Man I flew on a DC-10 or MD-90 direct flight across the country in 2015.

I can't remember what happened at landing but it wasn't fun .