this post was submitted on 15 Mar 2025
353 points (99.4% liked)

politics

21845 readers
5133 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Rep. Chuck Edwards’ North Carolina town hall erupted in chaos as constituents furiously protested DOGE, a Trump administration initiative tied to mass federal job cuts and Elon Musk’s growing influence.

Attendees, including laid-off government workers, jeered at Edwards over employment losses and reduced federal funding.

Constituents raised concerns about federal job cuts affecting veterans' services, national parks, and Hurricane Helene recovery efforts.

Edwards struggled to respond but remained unfazed. The GOP downplayed the unrest, calling it staged, though independent voters like veteran Martin Downie say they feel directly targeted by their own government.

top 44 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 3 points 46 minutes ago

But others, like Downie, aren't necessarily on the left end of the political spectrum. He's a registered independent who served under presidents of both parties during his time in the Army.

"independent"

How to say you are voting Republican but not exactly proud about it...

[–] [email protected] 67 points 12 hours ago (4 children)

Where the fuck was all this rage in November, my fellow Americans? We already had four years of Trump, January 6 insurrection, a disastrous reduction in foreign relations. But I guess that wasn't enough???

[–] [email protected] 26 points 9 hours ago

These are MAGA morons, deplorables if you will, who are now upset that they're being affected by project 2025 because they had it in their heads that they would be spared as being good whites and it would only affect minorities and liberals because they're racist deplorables.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

You do not understand the power of ~~the dark side~~ propaganda.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Marketing, as an industry, should be stamped out of existence. It's just professional lying.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

But this is what I don’t get - Trump isn’t even good at lying. Practically every word is a lie but fails on logic and he’ll usually say the opposite soon enough. How do people even fall for it? Do they actually listen to him?

It must be just cherry-picking: if he says enough lies you can usually find one you like. But how could you reconcile that one thing you think you agree with out of a vast ocean of lies?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 hours ago

There's zero expectation of discernment in a cult. And MAGA is a political cult.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

No need to guess, it wasn’t enough. I think in hindsight, Covid is going to seem like a pleasant nostalgic time.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

It already does.

Especially the first part of it where we were baking bread or whatever.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I know a ton of people died, and countless more where hurt, and it hurt the economy, but as an introvert hermit, GOD DO I MISS LOCKDOWN.

I do my best to keep up the life style, but I'm still expected to go into the office every once in a while for my wasted day as we all call it.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 hours ago

And even the bread … I got so fat and my cholesterol sky rocketed

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 hours ago

These were the people that voted for this.

[–] [email protected] 41 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (3 children)

Too bad there isn't a Dem that could really thrive at this moment of darkness for some good. 2016 Bernie's messaging would connect now more than ever but that time has passed. I'm glad Republican voters are mad, even if I bet it is just because they are being affected too, not really mad about the harm.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Too bad there isn’t a Dem that could really thrive at this moment of darkness for some good.

AOC seems to be having a moment. And Bernie seems to be in the recruitment phase for something, at least I hope he is.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

And Bernie seems to be in the recruitment phase for something, at least I hope he is.

Don't expect much from Bernie on that front. He's a good progressive Senator, but he'll never actually lead a progressive movement. I don't know if he doesn't have it in him anymore or if he's just not that kind of guy, but Bernie works a lot better as a symbol than as a leader.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

He's already led two progressive movements.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 7 hours ago

Led them to what?

[–] [email protected] 12 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

AOC seems to be throwing in with Bernie. Yes, Bernie is getting older, but with a sort of confirmed 'successor' may still have some bite..... as long as the Democratic party doesn't pull the same bullshit.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

I don't think you're getting me. Just voting for progressive candidates won't fix things. I don't know if there was any point where that was enough to fix things, but if there was it definitely isn't now. Therefore, Bernie—who did not, does not and will not recommend any method of resistance beyond simply voting—is incapable of leading a progressive movement. Bernie and politicians like him need an independent progressive movement behind them to win elections; if you put them in charge of the movement they'll sit around doing nothing for most of the year.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 hours ago

I don’t think you’re getting me. Just voting for progressive candidates won’t fix things. I don’t know if there was any point where that was enough to fix things, but if there was it definitely isn’t now.

I was a vote guy until last November. You're absolutely 100% right. Electoralism has failed. We cannot expect elected officials to somehow fix this and we cannot expect people in Washington to fix it. Bernie said as much himself. The system is corrupt to its core and it's gonna take a movement from the grass roots level to change it.

Or more likely America will just become a fascist dictatorship complete with concentration camps, disappearing people, fake ass state run media, and pretend elections.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 hours ago

Eh, probably need an old white guy. Walz or Newsome are the two who should be getting in the spotlight now. Then the Dems get a group of progressives who will back either of them to make some waves and say what they won’t. Dems need to be more unified and not go too crazy. Too many young people are MAGA inclined, no matter how left leaning they say.

But I’m just some guy. I’m sure they know better and it’s “her/his time” or whatever they want to push.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

Just a friendly correction, it's affected, not effected. Affected is a verb (which is how I remember).

[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 hours ago

Actually it’s super confusing because they can both be verbs and they can both be nouns.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 13 hours ago

Thanks I fixed it.

[–] [email protected] 102 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

I guess it's good that non-political people are starting to get involved. Shame they didn't spend 5 minutes to check which way the wind was blowing in November last year.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

They'll still vote for fascism. They're just angry it's impacting them directly.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

In the end it will always affect them directly. So they'll remain angry until they get half of a fucking clue about the issues.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

So they'll remain angry until they get half of a fucking clue about the issues.

Then they'll be even more angry. I know I am.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 hours ago

I think the only way I could be associated with Texas is if the association included drunk. Hope you're doing okay.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 13 hours ago

western north carolina actually saw a notable leftward shift

[–] [email protected] 17 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Shame they didn’t spend 5 minutes to check which way the wind was blowing in November last year.

Which is especially weird, since they should've learned the importance of it from the wind in September.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 hours ago

2017 on line two, sir.

[–] [email protected] 91 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

This was a fun one to watch. Edwards said that he was proud to vote for the budget resolution and was booed hard. He smiled in response, like a goddamn sociopath, further enraging the people. A veteran stood up, shouted louder than the crowd and was forcibly removed by police. At the end of the town hall, Edwards hid inside the building for almost an hour, waiting for the crowd to disperse. Not only were they all waiting for him outside, they surrounded his car and made him sit in the center of a parking lot protest for 20 minutes until the police broke it up. Fuck any public servant that refuses to represent their constituency.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

20 minutes?

It should be 20 fucking days.

Surround his fucking house.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 12 hours ago

They stayed until the police forced the protesters to allow him passage.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

If this is the response now, imagine the response when they crash the entire economy. Not a smart thing to do with a heavily armed population.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 10 hours ago

Help us heavily-armed rednecks. You're one of our only hopes.

[–] [email protected] 45 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

Now maybe if democrats could take advantage of this rage instead of being complicit.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 15 hours ago

Sorry. Book tours and all. Worthless Senate Minority Leader out front shoulda told ya.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (2 children)

Cunts? Because if you mean cunts you would be completely right. Cowards would be right too.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 hours ago

I'd be ok with calling them cunts except they lack the depth and the warmth.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 14 hours ago

Agreed. I'm pretty sure we can call them bootlickers now.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

They were supposed to directly target OTHERS, not MEEEEEEE!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 42 minutes ago

"He’s not hurting the people he needs to be hurting."