earphone843

joined 6 days ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 hours ago

It's like comparing a speeding ticket with Ted Bundy.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 hours ago (5 children)

You were still buying a license to play the games.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 hours ago

Just a small correction, it's abets.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 hours ago

For the next 12 days

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 hours ago

Nah, there will be a celebration on the streets outside the venue.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Iirc it's an echo location thing.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Sells licenses.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 hours ago (14 children)

You've never owned your games. It's always been a license to play the games. It's just that now they have the ability to enforce it.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Lol, you think a person who implements such a policy will apply it to themselves?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 hours ago

Not if you're salaried exempt!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 hours ago

That's actually why. You have to drain the power from the circuits.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 23 hours ago

Actually, both are true. There's not just one type of homeless person, which is a large part of why it's such a complex issue to address.

There are a lot of homeless who are severely mentally ill, addicted to drugs, or both (self medication). These people are a significant portion of the homeless (~1/3 mentally ill, ~1/3 alcohol, ~1/4 drugs).

There are also a lot of homeless people who had some bad luck and need help getting back on their feet.

There's no one size fits all fix here, but the idea of giving someone a stack of cash and expecting it to be used responsibly is absurd. There need to be guardrails in place.

I'm not disparaging the people who can't spend a stack of cash responsibly either. They need help in the form of social services, not money.

view more: next ›