this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2025
350 points (100.0% liked)

politics

21724 readers
4343 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It’s every international thru-hiker’s worst nightmare: training for a long hike, saving enough money for the trip, and clearing your calendar, only to be stopped at the border and turned back before ever setting foot on US soil — let alone the trail.

Seasoned German thru-hiker and Trek blogger Annika “Ravenclaw” Ananias says that nightmare came true for her — and escalated to a horrifying degree when she attempted to enter the US to hike the Arizona Trail (AZT) last month.

Ananias had expected the journey to be routine, having previously come to the US on a B2 tourist visa in 2022 and 2024 to thru-hike the PCT and CDT, respectively. But upon reaching US passport control this time, she found herself detained, interrogated, and accused of intending to work illegally in the US.

Ananias says she was separated from her American boyfriend, shouted at and mocked by US border officials, and detained overnight in a cold, shared holding cell without access to medication. After 22 hours of incarceration, the hammer fell: despite having broken no laws and holding the same valid B2 visa under which she previously hiked the PCT and CDT, she was deported back to Germany and handed a five-year ban on re-entering the United States.

top 48 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 51 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

They're denying foreign nationals due process. When the time comes, they can just call you a foreign national. What are you gonna do, prove it in court without due process?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

They're already doing this ALL the time. Even before the Trump administration, an average of one citizen gets deported every month, and if you don't have a lawyer on the outside fighting for you, you're fucked.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 hours ago

Now imagine it en masse on purpose.

Right before an election.

[–] [email protected] 269 points 1 day ago (3 children)

The message is clear: Do not come to the United States as a tourist. Do not spend your money in the United States. Do not support businesses that operate from the United States. Our borders are closed, our economy crumbling, our government falling to fascism, and our culture dominated by a relatively small minority of aggressively ignorant morons.

Don't come. We've gotten unfathomably stupid over here, and it's no longer safe.

[–] [email protected] 42 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Canadian tourist destinations be like:

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 hours ago

Je visiterai le Canada dans deux semaines. Bonjour.

Peut-être que je ne reviendrai pas à la maison.

[–] [email protected] 53 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

You are welcome to come here to liberate us through effective means

[–] [email protected] 11 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

I hear the void is lovely this time of year.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 22 hours ago

I've been screaming into it since November.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 22 hours ago

Hail Sithis!

[–] [email protected] 16 points 19 hours ago

Or for work. I would refuse to go there if my manager told me to go. And if he'd still insist on it, I'd demand a $10.000.000 life insurance while I'd be there, for my family.

[–] [email protected] 38 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

My wife and I chose not to go to Portland on a holiday this March, and she's American. We joke that she may get deported to Mexico because she's a Latina.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 18 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 hours ago

Just read the article. Thank you for sharing. Please don't share with anyone else out of fear that Trump sees it too.

[–] [email protected] 100 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I had to inform my grandparents they wont likely see their great granddaughter again because we do not want to risk the border.

I feel bad but at the same time, they voted for this.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 22 hours ago

My wife will not be visiting with me this year. The plan was for her to apply for a visa and visit in the winter or fall.

Pretty quickly, we agreed that I’ll just go alone.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Did your grandparents actually vote for Trump?

[–] [email protected] 39 points 23 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

I’m curious as to how they responded to them being told they won’t be able to see her.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

I honestly dont know if they really understood or took it seriously. Theyre really getting up there in age. Im just trying to make sure they at least get pictures of her from time to time.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 hours ago

Why bother? Cut toxic people out of your life, you have no obligation to be nice to assholes.

[–] [email protected] 65 points 23 hours ago (3 children)

sounds like they were targeting Europeans.

Gee. i wonder why....

The fascists are doing everything in their power to isolate us from the rest of the west. The better to propagandize us.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 hours ago

Russia wants to break up the west, for us not to be allies, for us to hate each other and that's not only the government but the will of the people.

Being locked up for no reason and treated badly tends to make someone hostile. We need to remember our true enemy is trump, his cronies and the others benefiting from this situation - Putin.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 hours ago

You mean like fox news saying Canada is run by Nazi... oh I mean Cartels.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 23 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

No. Not like Russia.

Why would you think that, Komrade?

Edit: actually I was thinking more like North Korea, but Russia works too.

[–] [email protected] 52 points 1 day ago (7 children)

This is infuriating. How can this even be legal?

[–] [email protected] 13 points 11 hours ago

To MAGAs, anything you get away with is legal.

[–] [email protected] 57 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

You think the maga freaks care what's legal!? AND traditional "small government, financially conservative" Republicans give them the cover they need to defraud and strip the country for scrap, they are just as complicit. Any true Patriot would have voted to haul them in front of Congress by now (no matter what party), or impeached Trump...

[–] [email protected] 19 points 23 hours ago

Oh they do care what's legal, but not for the same reasons.

They think that any laws against their beliefs are there specifically to persecute them. Because that's exactly what they would be doing (as an individual) if they were in power. Hence the bullshit we are seeing now with them gaining power.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Anything is legal when you just ignore the law and make up the rules to suit your own agenda.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 23 hours ago (3 children)

Surely this wouldn’t hold up when she eventually files a lawsuit right?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 hours ago

Why would she even want to come back. The world is big, there are less shitty places to go for a hike.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 17 hours ago

Have you ever tried to get justice as a foreigner in am American court? Good luck with that. Yes, American courts are that biased.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 23 hours ago

In whose court?

[–] [email protected] 23 points 23 hours ago

For any non citizen, non LPR (green card), the border official at the desk holds the final authority on whether to admit. This is true with a visa or without one. US visas (not green cards) can be effectively cancelled at the border with no notice.

All visitors to the US, visa or no, must overcome a presumption of immigrant intent at the border interview each time they visit.

Unfortunately, the whole story seems to be legal. I would recommending thru hiking in some less shit hole countries.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

From the article ...

The legal mechanism behind Ananias’ harrowing experience is known as “expedited removal.” Created in 1996, the statute grants broad powers to low-level border officials to unilaterally remove non-citizens from the United States without a hearing in front of an immigration judge

[–] [email protected] 10 points 23 hours ago

“legality” has never stopped rulers before

[–] [email protected] -5 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Nobody has a right to enter any other country then their own.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 hours ago

What in the everloving fuck are visas for, then?

[–] [email protected] 26 points 23 hours ago (3 children)

From the article ...

Documents viewed by The Trek indicate that Ananias was deported and banned from entering the US for five years on February 25, despite having a valid visa. US Customs and Border Patrol declined a request to comment for this story, citing privacy concerns.

The officer asked how she had financed her previous stays in the United States; Ananias explained about her freelance work in Germany and additional financial support from her father and offered to show bank statements. “She refused to look at them and accused me of either being a millionaire or having worked illegally. She spoke in an aggressive tone, frequently interrupted me, and repeatedly raised her voice,” said Ananias.

The legal mechanism behind Ananias’ harrowing experience is known as “expedited removal.” Created in 1996, the statute grants broad powers to low-level border officials to unilaterally remove non-citizens from the United States without a hearing in front of an immigration judge

Expedited removal cannot be appealed under the independent judiciary, but can be contested within the department by an individual or their lawyer through the DHS Traveler Redress Inquiry Program. As Ananias’ evidence was not properly reviewed in interrogation and her medical needs were ignored in holding, in theory she has strong grounds for review of the decision. However, it is a lengthy, complicated process, with the burden of proof on the individual.

In light of her traumatizing experience, Ananias said she would likely not attempt to contest the ban and would steer clear of the US as long as the current climate on border security holds, for fear of going through the same thing again. “I had entered the United States multiple times without issue in the past, yet this time I was treated as a criminal,” she emphasized.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 12 hours ago

accused me of either being a millionaire… As if that’s a crime in America

[–] [email protected] 17 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

Personally I really wish she would contest it. If not just for her, but to set a precedent that would protect those who came after her.

Plus she's due compensation for what she was put through.

~This~ ~comment~ ~is~ ~licensed~ ~under~ ~CC~ ~BY-NC-SA~ ~4.0~

[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

[...] but to set a precedent that would protect those who came after her

Would it, though?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

Would it, though?

Legally, yes.

If they kept repeating the same thing, they started getting fined a lot, and then to be a little hard for Elon to explain how he's saving money when he's paying Court fines.

They have not crossed that line yet, not obeying the courts.

~This~ ~comment~ ~is~ ~licensed~ ~under~ ~CC~ ~BY-NC-SA~ ~4.0~

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 hours ago

How do you expect to win... anything... if you don't fight for it?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 21 hours ago

It would never see a court room though. These days, there’s nothing you can do.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 22 hours ago

and accused me of either being a millionaire

Accused of not having enough money.