“historically”
Science no longer allowed to discuss the past
this post was submitted on 04 Feb 2025
139 points (99.3% liked)
chapotraphouse
13682 readers
821 users here now
Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.
No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer
Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
This study aims to impove our understanding of longitudinal double-spin asymmetry for inclusive jet and dijet production in polarized proton collisions at √𝑠 =200 GeV
- Does the TITLE or ABSTRACT contain keywords and context that implicate the EO?
- Yes
- Retain flag, DEIA and other EO language found (Category 3)
- END
polarized gay protons BTFO
This study aims to prove how Trump has historically been treated so unfairly by the news media
Too woke. Banned
These people are pathetic. I know they feel big and strong right now because they have a bit of power they can use to go smash shit up. But like they are genuinely, unreservedly, without qualification... Pathetic.
Like it would be hard not to laugh at them if one walked into my house... That and maybe a special treat for them. Simply 
I'd like to beat them with a baseball bat, while laughing. Such loserdom.
biases
statistics and machine learning nerds owned
"in North Korea, they ban topics from research that go against Kim Jon Un's party line."
One thing that surprises me is that this is all words I would associate with culture war. I would have expected them to ban something like "poverty".
“Facts don’t care about your feelings….but they care about MINE!”
Don’t worry they got ‘socioeconomic’ in there
Seems like "barrier", "status", "polarization", "excluded", and "historically" are gonna hit some unrelated fields
"This catalyst can lower the energy barrier for industrially relevant reactions" WOKE
"This increases the polarization of the chemical bond" WOKE
Almost any of them could hit unrelated fields. "Female" could be referring to female plants.
The flow chart does specify that decisions are made on banned terms AND context, so I guess that's how they'll avoid ~~retracting~~ denying nearly everything.
This is for funding grant proposals, so they wouldn't be retracting anything. Doesn't look like they're looking at context at all, based on the flowchart, a proposal with a title like "Effects of colloidal silver on female Cannabis plants" would get rejected in the first step.
load more comments
(6 replies)
Amerikan right wingers have never given the tiniest fuck if their policies have a disastrous fallout for education and science. Fascists in particular see intellectual impoverishment of the people as an additional benefit, remember German Physics?
I'm honestly surprised this largely sticks to gender studies and research into racism etc., would have expected them to take the axe to climate science as well.
They are doing that one abit more subtly. They can't challenge it directly, as that combats their opinions of themselves as 'scientific' but I am seeing papers coming out of Midwestern ecology schools (which are subsequently pushed hard on social media), that are pushing forward a hypothesis that 'we just don't know enough about the carbon cycle, there are lots of unaccounted carbon creating beings that could be helping with the warming', as well as people saying that because there have been no apocalyptic universal Hollywood spectacal collapse that 'the climate scientists got all their predictions wrong'.
It'll creep into mainstream thought over time, especially as it becomes too late to change.
I am seeing papers coming out of Midwestern ecology schools
Can you link one of those? Love to know what I'm up against.
I'll see if I can actually find it, I only know about it second-hand myself.
there have been no apocalyptic universal Hollywood spectacle collapse
What do you call the LA wildfires?
They aren't 'universal' (other than the studio, yuk yuk) enough, as apocalyptic as they should be. Already seeing people just blaming California state government, and not connecting it to the awful smog and fires coming down from Canada, because memory is basically a month for most.
load more comments
(4 replies)
Can't wait for all the neuropharmacology studies that are going to get defunded because of the "blood-brain barrier."
Sounds woke to me
load more comments
(3 replies)
so all papers that talk about statistical biases (most papers) are just gone
Flagging the word “bias” in scientific papers when it is standard to have a subsection listing biases or the lack of…
Fucking morons at the helm. RIP to American science.
They're not flagging research, they're flagging grant applications they typically don't have bias sections.
Ah I see, well I still stand by my second line
How TF did we get out-maneuvered by these literal manchildren?
And the government's priority is literally coddling their feelings.
Easy to outmaneuver us when we ain't maneuvering in the first place. 95% of western leftist movements are dead or controlled opposition.
Because they have political power to translate it into tangential actions. They have it easier anyways.
Small correction imo. They have billionaires literally funding everything they do, which translates into political power. The left, especially in the U.S., have no billionaires on their side, which means that we are without the means of production of political power in this country. The sad part is the Democrats who also have billionaires on their side and are still outmaneuvered, but the stakes are much less for them so they don't really care that much.
The left, especially in the U.S., have no billionaires on their side
Do I mean nothing to you? 
Look I haven't received my check in years George.
Yes, it's been years and your checks still don't clear.
The manchildren are sometimes billionaires themselves.
Females
Elon's no girls allowed club of literal teenaged boys running DOGE are taking out their Jordan Peterson inspired rage at the women who wouldn't sleep with them.
load more comments
(1 replies)
I look forward to the future where scientific paperwork uses early 2000s type slang to dodge the basic word filter.
1337 f3m413 h4x0rz
xX_PhEnOtYpE_Xx
Analyzing how often Isntreal soldiers unalive themselves after being in 🍉
load more comments
(1 replies)
view more: next ›