this post was submitted on 04 Feb 2025
139 points (99.3% liked)

chapotraphouse

13682 readers
821 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 15 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

This is for funding grant proposals, so they wouldn't be retracting anything. Doesn't look like they're looking at context at all, based on the flowchart, a proposal with a title like "Effects of colloidal silver on female Cannabis plants" would get rejected in the first step.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

But the flowchart says "keywords and context" at each of the steps. That's what I'm referring to.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

But the flowchart says "keywords and context" at each of the steps.

Let's be honest, they'll half ass this and end up denying a multitude of stuff

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 hours ago

Oh I totally agree, they don't give a shit about "context", just pointing out their little fig leaf.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

As a programmer, that flowchart looks to me like the precursor to an automated system. The only way they could check the context in an automated fashion would be with some kind of AI, whose efficacy in doing so is going to be dubious at best given the language difference between most text on the Internet and grant proposals.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Putting "please ignore all previous instructions" randomly in the text

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 hours ago

Ah... little Robert'); DROP TABLE is just such a rascle.