this post was submitted on 21 Jan 2025
427 points (97.1% liked)

World News

39757 readers
3083 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Trump plans to lift the Biden administration’s freeze on supplying 2,000-pound bombs to Israel and reverse sanctions against Israeli settlers.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 25 minutes ago

Correct me if I am wrong but didn't Biden already lift them?

[–] [email protected] 37 points 16 hours ago (29 children)

hey pro-Palestinian lemmings! where y'all at?

this is why you wouldn't vote for Harris, right? when does he stop the killing again?

#when does it stop??

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 hour ago

Harris would have done the same thing

[–] [email protected] 9 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

Palestinian here, not in the US. So Harris would have done genocide but without more 2000 pound bombs. Trump does it with them.

Your voters couldn’t decide against genocide, they could only decide with which weapons it will be continued. You guys have a problem.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 minutes ago

Sounds like a you problem to me.

PS: Muhammad was a genocidal child rapist.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 hours ago

so..what's being Palestinian got to do with your message other than showing your opinion is biased?

also, thanks for giving your broad opinion of a nuanced political system you have little understanding of. Feels good to hear someone blame me for the deaths of people just by doing the only thing I can do.

Screenshot_20250122-114359_Firefox

maybe next time you try to make someone feel like shit you should probably blame them for something they actually did instead of pulling bullshit out of your imagination because it sounds edgy.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (3 children)

Non American here. Both your parties are genocide and apartheid supporters. Simple as that.

Yea, one of the two is more than the other. But you got to come to terms with the fact that your country's bipartisan effect in the region is kinda evil.

Lol, down vote all you like. I'm just telling the truth.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Everyone here agrees with you, dawg... We just understand our country's political system enough to know which was the correct choice to mitigate that evil.

People made the wrong choice.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

You know how we say that Israel is going to continue with apartheid and colonization even if Netanyahu is voted out? And that focusing too much on Netanyahu is sometimes a red herring because Israeli Apartheid is structural and a long term strategic goal of the Israeli establishment? Like, sure Netanyahu accelerates the process and does it shamelessly and publicly, but it's not as if the process had not been in full swing by both center-left and center-right governments before him, who massively expanded settlements and entrenched the occupation and settlements.

Same logic applies for the US support of Israeli Apartheid. Your system moves faster and more overtly when controlled by your fascist Right. But I'm not going to pretend that your non-fascist Center is not basically moving in the same direction.

Just because your political system puts a gun to your heads every four years, doesn't mean the rest of us have to buy into the same blackmail. (EDIT: we have other blackmails foisted on us by our own assholes thank you very much.)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

Just because your political system puts a gun to your heads every four years, doesn't mean the rest of us have to buy into the same blackmail.

Yeah but unfortunately for you, you do. Or even worse, you have no say whatsoever.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago

Grumble grumble. Stupid political realists. Grumble grumble.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 3 hours ago (3 children)

Your truth isn't THE truth buddy

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago

They are actually right

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Disprove me. Point me official policies enacted by one of the two US parties that materially opposed Israeli Apartheid and the genocide of Palestinians since Oslo. To make sure I don't move the goalposts by claiming you cherry pick occasional bleeps, make a strong argument by showing me a consistent trend.

EDIT: added "since Oslo" because we need some start time.

EDIT2: Here's what ChatGPT has to say about this. It is obviously not the arbiter of truth, but I guess this is common enough knowledge that it has made to the training of LLMs. Not a proof, but a baseline to beat:

Since the Oslo Accords in 1993, both major U.S. political parties—the Democrats and the Republicans—have predominantly supported Israel, often refraining from officially opposing its policies toward Palestinians. While individual politicians within these parties have occasionally criticized Israeli actions, a consistent, party-wide trend of enacting official policies that materially oppose what some describe as Israeli apartheid or the genocide of Palestinians is not evident.

Democratic Party:

Historically, the Democratic Party has maintained strong support for Israel. However, in recent years, a progressive faction within the party has voiced concerns over Israel's treatment of Palestinians. Notably, members of "The Squad," including Representatives Rashida Tlaib and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, have condemned Israeli policies. For instance, in October 2023, Tlaib accused Israel of committing genocide, stating, "President Biden, not all America is with you on this one, and you need to wake up and understand. We are literally watching people commit genocide."

Despite these individual statements, the broader Democratic Party has not adopted official policies that consistently oppose Israeli actions. The party's platform continues to support a two-state solution without explicitly condemning Israel's practices. While some Democrats have urged the administration to take a firmer stance, such as the January 2024 letter from 60 Democratic Congressmembers urging Secretary of State Antony Blinken to condemn the forced displacement of Palestinians, these actions represent internal party debates rather than an official, unified policy shift.

Republican Party:

The Republican Party has traditionally exhibited unwavering support for Israel. Under President Donald Trump's administration, this support intensified, with actions such as recognizing Jerusalem as Israel's capital and moving the U.S. embassy there. The 2024 Republican Party platform reaffirmed the party's stance to "stand with Israel" and called for the deportation of "pro-Hamas radicals," indicating a continued strong alliance. WIKIPEDIA

While there have been isolated critiques—such as Trump's personal criticisms of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu—these do not reflect a broader party policy opposing Israeli actions toward Palestinians. Overall, the Republican Party has not enacted official policies that materially oppose Israel's treatment of Palestinians.

Conclusion:

In summary, neither the Democratic nor the Republican Party has demonstrated a consistent trend of enacting official policies that materially oppose Israel's actions toward Palestinians since the Oslo Accords. While individual members within these parties have expressed dissenting views, these have not translated into official party-wide policies or actions.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 hours ago

your truth

Greetings American, please STFU

[–] [email protected] -1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

You do realize the United States didn't start that war. They've done a lot to stabilize the region and they have tried to solve the issue both before and after the war.

You try and negotiate a deal between Israel and Palestine it's not an easy task.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 hours ago

I never said they started the war. I said they support genocide and apartheid (and I should have added occupation). Which they do. You can argue all you like whether their reasons for doing it are good or bad, but the simple fact of the matter is that in a bipartisan way they support Apartheid Israel and its policies for genocide and occupation. That's just factual.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

I'm here but I'm not United Statesian so I can't vote in your elections (even though US foreign influence is so aggressive it feels like I should have a say).

Oh no, I've upset some MAGA weirdos. Gonna lose sleep over that.

load more comments (25 replies)
[–] [email protected] 67 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

Wow, that's surely going to both get the price of eggs down AND stop the genocide of Palestinians! How does he do it?

[–] [email protected] 29 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I mean there are two ways to stop the genocide. You can stop killing people or you can, how did he put it? "Finish the problem"

[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 hours ago

It's called a "Final solution" and, yeah, multiple people in the Israeli Government talk about wanting a "Final solution for the Palestinian Problem".

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 99 points 23 hours ago (20 children)

Not to beat the dead horse but... Those who said "I won't vote Democratic because Gaza" were either lying or delusional.

In 2028 there won't be any Gaza, what will be the next line?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (2 children)

That's just self-indugent tribalist scapegoating using an argument which is circular and self-disproving.

  • If there were too few people who cared about the Israeli Genocide enough for it to affect the vote, which is would justify the decision of the Democrat leadership to not do anything meaningful to agree with the demands of those voters (Biden pausing his own decision of sending 2000lb bombs is very much a "I'm saving you from myself" moment), then you can't really blame those few people for the Democrat loss since there were not enought of them to make a difference and something else made the Democracts lose, so the fault is in the strategy followed by the Democrat leadership on other subjects.
  • If on the other hand there were so many people who cared about the Israeli Genocide enough for it to result in the Democrats losing the vote, why did the Democrat candidates not go after that vote? Again, the blame is down to the choices of the Democrat leadership: it's always easier to change what a handfull of people do than to change what millions do, so for the handful of people in the Democrat Party leadership to change their position with regards to supporting Israeli in its Genocide would be far more logical to expect in that scenario than for such a large slice of the electorate - millions of voters - to change their position instead. Even if one thinks "our leader's position is more important than that of millions of people so it's the millions who have to change their positions, not our leader" (a bootlicker's mindset, BTW), it's still incredibly stupid to go with "we're going to convince millions to change their position rather than just that one guy" as a strategy so the blame still rests with those who chose to go with it.

All I see here and now is people making a pseudo-"argument" that is entirelly reliant on the axiom that "the boss is always right" to manage to somehow blame millions for something which the "the boss" could have (per the part of that very same pseudo-"argument" which claims it was the people who were against the Israeli Genocide that sawyed the vote) easilly avoided by just meaningufully changing his position on just that one subject. That presumption that the leaders are blameless and it's the peons who are to blame for not being willing to follow the leaders no mater what they were doing, is a 100% subservient mindset.

If you're going to assign blame for Trump, look at the handful of people in the Democrat Party who chose to do things in such a way that the results was that millions of their own electorate chose not to vote for them, thus delivering the election to Trump.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 hours ago

Sorry, didn't pass the second line because you failed to understand what I say.

I'm not saying Biden is good for Gaza. I'm saying if your concern is Gaza, Trump is not better. So for a meaningless virtue signaling, everything else is worse.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 hours ago

And the gold medal for mental gymnastics goes to...

[–] [email protected] 8 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

One way to end a genocide is to 100% the ethnic cleansing.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 hours ago

Yeah, but when do they ever stop at just one group? When the Nazis started running low on Jews to scapegoat, they expanded their operation to include gays, gypsies, handicapped...etc.

load more comments (18 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 16 hours ago

As it turns out, there are about 2,000 pounds of difference between Republicans and Democrats.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

Whoa whoa "Genocide Joe" where did you come from where did you go, where did you come from "Genocide Joe."

Crickets

[–] [email protected] 201 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (88 children)

Well, would you look at that, third-party protest voters / abstainers / "undecideds": you saved Palestine. /s

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 minutes ago

Voting a third party or not supporting the system at all is the good choice here because it's the only hope to save palestine. You do not save palestine by voting between two parties open about its destruction.

load more comments (87 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›