686
submitted 2 years ago by DoctorTYVM@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] Roundcat@kbin.social 132 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

As a queer person, extending the acronym past what is necessary feels like pandering in the best light, and purposely trying to bait ridicule in the worst. The whole point of LGBT was to include anyone on the spectrum that was gay or trans, and the Q was supposed to include anyone who considers themselves queer, even if they don't meed those parameters. I can understand wanting to include I because intersex people are often left out of the conversation, and I even understand A because there is a lot of debate even within the LGBTQ community itself as to whether asexuals are considered queer or not. But when you start incorporating numbers, symbols, or extending past 5 letters within the acronym, you are defeating the purpose of having an acronym, creating confusion, baiting ridicule, and even making people not explicitly represented in the acronym feel excluded.

And there is already a single, all encompassing, inclusive, one syllable word that describes the community and all who occupy it: "Queer." It's easier to say, remember, and hell, even type if you are typing LGBTQ past 5 letters. But because of it being appropriated and used as a slur, there are many even within the community who are even afraid to utter it, let alone identify with it. Which is a god damned shame there is nothing inherently wrong the word, cause even in its original meaning, it meant someone who was outside the norm or otherworldly, and in literature has been used to describe characters like Gandalf, and characters in Shakespeare.

It describes me without having to explain or justify how or why. It describes how I feel as a person, how others see me, how I interact and relate to others. Its an adjective that can be verbed and adverbed. It's sharp and provocative, yet also warm and natural, like a forest green. People who have adopted and embraced the word for themselves feel the love within the word, and can extend it to others. And even for those outside the community, those who are brave enough to use it when talking in our defense come off as more decisive and confrontational, than the person who thinks adding another letter or number to the acronym will make them seem more legitimate.

It's time we stop fearing our word. It's time we recognize the difference between queer as an insult, and queer as a description of who we are, and we need to extend that to people who are willing to talk about us and our struggles or come to our defense. The word is only as evil as we are willing to reject it, and I will be dead in the ground before I let our word be the domain of queerphobes and bigots.

edit: ~~It's late and I'm going to bed. Apparently some people think I'm a self hating queer for thinking the acronym should be dropped for an all inclusive term, and so be it. It's late and I want to get some sleep. And a lot of the people making this argument I know haven't read past the first paragraph, much less to here. Anything clarification they could want can be found here and in my other posts here. Otherwise, if they are not going to put in the effort to read, I'm not going to put in the effort to respond.~~

edit 2: I wanted to make a separate inclusion because I have had a chance to sleep and cool off, and I wanted to address some of the more combative posts in my replies: I get it. We as a community suffer attacks constantly, even from within the community, so I understand why so many here are on guard and skeptical of my intentions. And I'll admit, my post probably could be better written. I'm not exactly the best at articulating my thoughts. But the point of my post is not to exclude anyone from the community, but rather embrace a word that includes everyone. I would like to hear counterpoints to my argument, because maybe what I need is a different perspective on the issue. I would love to hear from people who prefer the acronym, and why they feel it maybe more inclusive. I am a flawed human being with many faults. I grew up in a conservative background, and my life up to this point has been trying to unlearn a lot of that. But I did not write this with the intention of excluding or singling out anyone. Forgive me I have done so.

[-] HawlSera@lemm.ee 40 points 2 years ago

Indeed.. all extending the acronym does is give the Far Right ammo for their unfunny "Alphabet Cult" jokes

At some point ya just gotta say "Look if you're not straight and not cis or just think that may be the case. You're in the club"

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] itsAsin@lemmy.world 33 points 2 years ago

i am really glad you took the time to put all of that into words. i, a queer person, agree completely.

[-] ridago@programming.dev 22 points 2 years ago

I wish everyone was this rational

[-] altima_neo@lemmy.zip 12 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Extending the acronym to cover everyone is becoming ridiculous. I think we just need a word that covers all the bases rather than trying to shoe horn one more letter/number/symbol/wingding that's already becoming difficult to keep track of. It doesn't bring attention to any one group, nor does it help individual groups as a whole when you're summed up into a letter.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (52 replies)
[-] FangedWyvern42@lemmy.world 69 points 2 years ago

LGBTQ2 - the long-awaited sequel.

[-] ArmokGoB@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 2 years ago

Best thing since they announced pussy 2

[-] BonesOfTheMoon@lemmy.world 68 points 2 years ago

There was a petition to offer refugee status to LGBT Americans put before the House of Commons recently, I just got an email update about it because I signed it, and apparently they accept some refugees on this basis, but it doesn't look like many. I say open the borders and bring me your gays, America. We'll be nicer to them than you are.

[-] PRUSSIA_x86@lemmy.world 17 points 2 years ago

My fiance and I have been looking into moving to Canada. He's a librarian in a small town and things are not looking so great.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee 48 points 2 years ago

The "2" is for two-spirited which is a traditional Native American concept and that is neat.

[-] user224@lemmy.sdf.org 49 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

So no LGBTQ sequel? 😥 /j

[-] ivanafterall@kbin.social 48 points 2 years ago
[-] dhork@lemmy.world 34 points 2 years ago

2 Gay 2 Fabulous

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 22 points 2 years ago

LGBTQ2: Electric Boogaloo

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] utopianfiat@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago

What's wild about "two-spirit" is that it's not a really definite concept (that is, it is a neologism from 1990 that does not have a universal understanding among tribal traditions) but what it does accomplish is replacing the perjorative European anthropological term

slurberdache, from Arabic burdaj "slave" meaning basically a young male submissive gay partner

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Compactor9679@lemm.ee 44 points 2 years ago
[-] TheRealKuni@lemmy.world 59 points 2 years ago

LGBTQ 2 has better graphics, split-screen multiplayer, a customizable interface, and hot-swappable controls. It also supports macros.

But now you have to pay for DLC maps.

[-] regalia@literature.cafe 37 points 2 years ago

LGBT was so popular that they made a sequel with 200% the gay

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] vlad76@lemmy.sdf.org 31 points 2 years ago

It's LGBT Q2. It's the second quarter for the LGBT corporation.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] StarkDay@lemm.ee 31 points 2 years ago

It stands for "two spirit," which is an Indigenous term for a gender identity similar to being transgender. Canada has been making a more concerted effort to acknowledge and respect Indigenous views and traditions, so it's added to the LGBT+ acronym in Canada

load more comments (15 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
[-] jerome@kbin.social 34 points 2 years ago

Wow.. that #2 seems to have taken this article hostage.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] zepheriths@lemmy.world 25 points 2 years ago

Damn. New version already?

[-] altima_neo@lemmy.zip 23 points 2 years ago

There's a part 2 now? How much better is it? Or is the original always the best?

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] oldbaldgrumpy@lemmy.world 23 points 2 years ago

OK, I can't keep up, what's the 2 mean? LOL

[-] Electricorchestra@lemmy.ml 25 points 2 years ago

It means two-spirited and it's part of an Indigenous concept of gender and worldview.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Sekoia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 2 years ago

It's more relevant for NA, it's an indigenous thing iirc.

load more comments (21 replies)
[-] pastermil@sh.itjust.works 22 points 2 years ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] chronicledmonocle@lemmy.world 17 points 2 years ago

LGBTQ2: Electric Bugaloo

[-] Smacks@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago

I hope the new v2 update doesn't come with a battlepass.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] MossyFeathers@pawb.social 14 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

“Not all countries have the same values and legal system that we have in Canada. As a result, it is important for you to be informed about the legal framework and social customs governing sexual orientation, gender identity, gender expression and sex characteristics in your destination country,” that page notes.

Wow, way to understate that. I suppose they have to downplay it though because if they were honest about the state of the US then they'd have to acknowledge that large swaths of the US can no longer be considered even remotely safe for members of the LGBT community. As such, they would have to consider the possibility that of members of the LGBT community might seek asylum in Canada and if so, that they could no longer turn them away on the basis that the US is a safe harbor (iirc many countries ban US citizens from seeking asylum because the US is supposed to be a "safe country").

Edit: Canada likes to claim that LGBT people from the US and UK can achieve refugee status, however the US-Canada Safe Third Country agreement says otherwise. Note that while there are exceptions to the agreement, none of them involve people who are members of the LGBT and/or BIPOC communities. In fact, it sounds like, based on the canada.ca link, that Canada recently expanded it to make it harder for people to claim refugee status if they're coming from the US, which is kinda the opposite of what they should be doing.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago

I can't say I blame them.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2023
686 points (95.9% liked)

News

35774 readers
2281 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS