this post was submitted on 17 Nov 2024
106 points (94.9% liked)

News

23301 readers
3369 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Trump will not be president for another two months but he is already dominating the Washington agenda again. This week a flurry of controversial and extremist picks for his cabinet and other high-ranking administration positions came at a hectic pace and with a level of provocation that made heads spin.

The choices included a Fox News host, a tech billionaire, an anti-vaccine activist, an alleged apologist for Russia’s Vladimir Putin and a congressman once embroiled in a sex-trafficking investigation. The lineup raised fears of authoritarianism or chaos – or both – once Trump and his allies are back in the Oval Office.

Tara Setmayer, a former Republican communications director on Capitol Hill, said: “Their entire political brand is shock and awe. Prior to Trump’s re-election it was notional. Now they have the power to execute all of their depravity with the full backing of American government power virtually unchecked. I don’t think the people who voted for Donald Trump, allegedly because of economic angst, have a full appreciation for what that means.”

top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

His appointments don’t last a week. The only thing he will change is tax breaks.

His last term is a pretty good indicator of his new one.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 hours ago

Except that those around him, whispering in his ear, have learned from the past and understand what he has to do differently this time around.

And that's fucking terrifying.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 8 hours ago (3 children)

I don’t think the people who voted for Donald Trump, allegedly because of economic angst, have a full appreciation for what that means.”

My cynical take is that those voters have already tuned out again, and aren't even paying attention to the consequences of their vote.

When it comes time to personally experience said consequences, they'll have forgotten their complicity and accept whatever feel-better answer is readily available. No lessons will be learned.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 hour ago
  • No lessons will be learned by the DNC. The voters have already learned that blue no matter who is a losing strategy.
[–] [email protected] 16 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

Since the economy/inflation are already on a rebound trajectory after the pandemic, he'll likely have a better economy at the start of his presidency than Biden, which will be credited to Trump's "day 1 dictator" policies.

If the economy declines further in the latter half of his presidency, once all of the tariffs are more widely felt and income inequality continues to worsen, that decline will be attributed to a probable loss of the Republicans' Senate or House majorities (or both) come 2026.

And if you read that and come to the realization "Don't you mean in 2027, when the newly-elected folks actually begin their terms?" Just consider how much of the US' poorly-planned pandemic response in 2020 was attributed to Biden...before he took office in 2021.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 7 hours ago

Hell, I consistently have to remind people that Bush bailed out the banks in Aug 2008. Obama didn't get to make a decision. He continued on the path Bush took, because doing anything else would have further tanked the economy.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

I doubt we're going to have midterms.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 hours ago

Oh we will, question is if they will be more like in Russia.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 hours ago

There'll be hell to pay if there isnt.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Anecdotal but that’s how all the magas in my office are acting. However myself and a few others are more than ready to remind them that they fucking asked for this when their precious eggs cost $30 a dozen

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (2 children)

Honest question: are eggs going to be affected? Corn feed for chickens is mainly domestic, there's a lot of US factory farms. I'd expect tarrifs to primarily hurt foodstuffs that are heavily mported, like avocadoes, bananas, grapes, tomatoes, cucumbers, bell peppers, etc.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 hours ago

Its unlikely that anything will be unaffected because of how meshed the entire global supply chain is, can’t harvest corn without equipment and the parts for tractors and other tools either comes from China or John Deere which is gouging farmers as much as they can

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 hours ago

Short answer: yes, maybe not $30/dozen and maybe not instantly but probably quickly.

Mechanized farming requires mechanized parts and transportation, even if domestic supply lines exist, the global market supply contributes to price. If that global market is heavily resricted through tariffs, price increases will propagate throughout the system.

The sudden and massive tariffs like trump has suggested (60% on all chinese goods, and 10% on all import goods) could be enough to spur a general global economic collapse. That is a huge amount of extra friction on a system tuned to extract maximum profit rather than be resilient, and we saw with the covid supply shocks how a string of comparatively local and sporadic events were able to wreck havoc.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 6 hours ago

I expect nothing less from the orange turd.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 8 hours ago

If you're shocked, you haven't been paying attention.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 hours ago