This whole thing reads like a Honeypot.
this post was submitted on 06 Nov 2024
119 points (89.9% liked)
No Stupid Questions
35706 readers
3235 users here now
No such thing. Ask away!
!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.
The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:
Rules (interactive)
Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.
All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.
Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.
Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.
Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.
Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.
Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.
That's it.
Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.
Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.
Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.
Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.
On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.
If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.
Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.
If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.
Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.
Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.
Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.
Let everyone have their own content.
Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.
Credits
Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!
The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Yeah that's fair, i know i glow like a rod of uranium
Late 2015.
I'm not an American, but I can't help but notice something:
A clear majority elected Trump. Over 71 million Americans went out of their way to vote for him, saying "I am proud to be a Nazi."
If you are going to fight (either figuratively or physically), then understand that a majority of the USA supports a fascist state.
71 million in a country of 262 million adults. 27% voted for fascism. 74 million voted for trump in 2020. This wasn't a shit towards fascism, but the opposition party utterly failing to win voters.
The country has never been majority rule. Every modern election has split the country in thirds, about a third votes one way, a third votes the other and a third choses not to vote.
Over 70% of voting aged americans did not vote for trump.
Unless you make voting mandatory, that will always be the case. Regardless, the split amongst non-voters is statistically likely to be the same as the people who actually voted. Consider the election to be an information poll, with a sample size of ~65% of the entire eligible population.
So with updated numbers, Trump got 72.5M out of ~240M eligible voters, so yeah you could say that 70% of the population didn't vote for him. But then to be clear, you should also look at Harris's 68M votes, and say that 72% of the population didn't vote for her.
The people who mark and deposit their ballots are the only measure we have of the nation's opinion, and in that contest a majority of the votes went to Trump.
This is meaningless though.
You said "a clear majority voted for Trump". In fact: a majority of Americans didn't vote for a fascist. That is a good thing.
Neither did a majority of Americans vote for a milquetoast centrist, but I don't expect anyone to take a great deal of comfort or pain in that fact.
If literally everyone is forced to vote things actually lean more left. The way you force people to vote though can affected different socioeconomic groups differently so can have a wide range of effects.
You solution to people not voting is not to appeal more to those people but to force them ? lol
That would not move anything to the left. Democrats would feel free to go as right as they want knowing that the are the only big party that is not the Republicans.
I can already see it, they would spend sooooo much money to make any actual left party unable to compete, then they would shift as much to the right as possible, and then loose.
And over 70% of eligible voters didn't vote against Trump.
Wait, did Trump win with 27% of votes!? How do you still use this system?
This isn't even a system issue (FPTP, electoral college).
What you're remarking on is the need for mandatory voting and a federal holiday on voting day
No, that's a misleading number.
27% of the entire eligible population voted for him. Less than that voted for Harris. About 45% of eligible voters didn't bother.
So Trump got more than 50% of the popular vote, as well as the majority of seats. First past the poll is a terrible system, but it's not the system that's at fault here, it's the voters.
HE won the fucking Popular vote!?!?!
no, "didn't vote" won the popular vote.
Likely, although all votes are not counted yet. All while getting fewer votes than previously, so he was very beatable. It seems people were just not excited to vote for Harris.
Coincidentally, a woman has never been elected POTUS, and she shifted right to embrace "former Republicans" while shrugging off progressives. Total coincidence.
I'm starting to think that America just really doesn't give a shit about politics if one of their choices is a woman.
No, he got >50% of all votes that were cast. The voting system wasn't the problem this time, the voters were.
load more comments
(2 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(2 replies)
I understand that wholeheartedly. But I personally refuse to be one of those people that sit back while everything deteriorates. When Hitler was elected a majority did nothing, but many chose resistance. I refuse to be the majority who live as cowards under fascism, so if that means I die resisting then so be it.
I don't think you actually did get my point.
The fascists are the majority. The majority will do nothing because they chose this, and you - the people fighting fascism - are in the minority.
I'm not saying I disagree with you, but it is important to understand that your revolution is actually going against the will of the American people.
You're right, but resistance is more than just revolution and even if everyone else is ok with living in 1984, I'm not. I know plenty of people who aren't and I have a feeling the majority of the people where I live aren't either (especially based on the voting data). Resistance to tyranny and injustice itself is just, and it can take many forms. Ideally yes there would be a revolution to remove the fascists from power and build something better, but that's mostly lip service. I won't lie, i was very frustrated when I wrote the post but in cooling down I am remembering that the resistance will have to start small and will have to grow. You're welcome to see some of my other comments for what I'm talking about that isn't revolution.
I personally wish I could just leave, but most countries won't accept a useless factory worker like myself... I'm quickly realizing this isn't my country. This is a country of Nazis.
These are the people that hear complaints that the entire yard is covered in rakes, but until they step on one and have it smack them in the face then it isn't a problem. I'm sick of living with selfish Nazis.
Hitler never even got close to a majority in any election. That's the scary part about this: Trump didn't even have to seize power, the population just handed it to him.
Australian here. I see in America a similar pattern than what happens here, one party (conservative) receives a functioning government and proceeds to fuck things up with absurd policies while at the same time immediately claiming credit for the state of the country as soon as they get into power. Takes years to change the momentum of a country and by the time a new party is elected the country is almost bottoming out at which point the new (left leaning) party spends most of their first term fixing things up only to get blamed at the next election for being in power when things turned to shit. The electorate will never understand that a new government needs years to undo the fuck ups of the likes of the GOP. This time the Dems haven’t had enough time to fix up all the stupid shit the GOP did last time so I expect these next 4 years the country to hit rock bottom while the GOP is still in power and it will sadly be a moment of “Americans got what they voted for”
So the only way of breaking the cycle is to keep the GOP in power for 8 or 12 years. Result is a massive decline and nobody to blame but themselves. But yeah, that probably won't work because someone else still gets the blame..
That has been happening here (US) for decades. The real problem is the escalation of stupid shit that Republicans do is on an exponential growth trajectory.
It was going to take decades to recover from how badly Trump fucked up the government last time he was in power, and the economy was only just starting to recover. With another term, its unlikely we'll be able to recover within my lifetime, my children will be left worse off than me.
This happens in the US, Canada, and many other western democracies.
The difference this time is that it's not just the GOP being shitty, it's an unhinged Nazi who just got elected, and has spent four years purging the party of unfaithful.
I mean what you saw last night is exactly why your revolutionary movement will be snuffed out. If the fascist has that kind of popular support, there is no revolution, only martyrdom. Maybe civil war.
First of all, I'm not from the USA so take this with a grain of salt, but are you suggesting the election was rigged or fraudulent? Because if not you're the one trying to impose an authoritative regime. Like it or not he was elected democratically, and this time you can't even use the excuse that your voting system is weird because he also got the majority of votes. So the majority of people in your country think that he's the correct person for the job, or in any case don't oppose him.
So what you're talking about is for a minority to raise arms against the democratically elected government. You are the one who's being anti-democratic. Even if you were to win the revolution you would need to put a tyrant in power because calling a new election would result in the same outcome.
Like it or not the majority of the people in your country are stupid enough to either want that or not caring. That's one of the dangers of democracy, but starting a revolution to remove a democratically elected president in the name of democracy is just as dumb.
but are you suggesting the election was rigged or fraudulent?
no.
Because if not you're the one trying to impose an authoritative regime.
also no, I'm advocating for community organizing against a very obviously fascist regime. im advocating for mutual aid and self reliance. y'know, the things people who are typically targeted by fascists need.
So what you're talking about is for a minority to raise arms against the democratically elected government.
again, not what I'm saying.
Even if you were to win the revolution you would need to put a tyrant in power because calling a new election would result in the same outcome.
not necessarily?
That's one of the dangers of democracy, but starting a revolution to remove a democratically elected president in the name of democracy is just as dumb.
nowhere did i say i was fighting in the name of democracy. I do think democracy is generally good, although i do not view the US as a democratic country. but that's not what im advocating for at all in this. I'm advocating for genuine survival under an oppressive regime and solidarity amongst the people against tyranny. if shit gets real bad, do i think it's just to fight against it and resist? absolutely. but as I've said in other comments, the American people aren't close to that yet. we need to organize first.
So what you’re talking about is for a minority to raise arms against the democratically elected government. again, not what I’m saying.
Then I recommend you crack open a dictionary and check the meanings of "get organized, involved, and armed", "stand, fight, and maybe even die" (your exact wording). Because raising arms against a democratically elected goverrnment IS EXACTLY what you are saying, albeit that you might not be saying you necessarily want to start that fight, but it certainly looks like it to me.
Yeah, nah.
Don’t tolerate intolerance, same goes with authoritarians, use force to remove them.
Sure, but so far he's just the democratically elected president, if after his term is up he doesn't want to leave then absolutely kick him by force. Until then any attack is, by definition, anti-democratic.
Seems like you're advocating:
- "Get organized/involved" - What's that mean in more practical terms? Start attending social gatherings put on/hosted by radical leftist organizations? And maybe start ones if they don't exist in your area?
- "Get armed" - So, acquire firearms. To use in some particular way? (You mentioned you're not advocating for "acts of violence or an insurrection like January 6th", so not that, apparently.) Or just to have for when "something" happens? If so, what specifically?
- "Don't wait until troops are rolling down the street to stage a resistance" - 'K. Not really helpful until I understand more specifically what you're advocating for people to do.
- "Start organizing" - Same as that first bullet?
- "Get involved in mutual aid" - Yeah, ok. I've read Eisenstein. I know his book Sacred Economics has some tips for how to get involved with existing mutual aid organizations. I definitely need to re-read that bit and read other sources about that. But at least I have an idea where to start with some of that, I guess. I'd still like more specifics on what in particular you mean by this, though.
- "Get involved with resistance" - So, let's say you're a respected voice in a mutual aid radical anarchist collective with guns and enthusiasm. What do you suggest they do?
- "Stand, fight, and maybe even die" - How? Not January 6th, but... how then?
- "Don't do nothing"/"Don't lay down and accept our fate" - Not really helpful on its own if we don't know what you're suggesting we do instead of "doing nothing" or "laying down and accepting our fate."
I don't really know if this is a "I can't really say what I'm advocating for because I'll be banned, so I'm dancing around the issue and hoping you'll stochastically pick up on what I'm not saying" thing either.
Without knowing more concretely what you suggest we do, I don't really have a take on whether I agree or not.
Are you expecting someone to provide you with all the answers?
Organize literally anything; a labor union, tenant union, alternatives to capital, a community garden, etc. Getting involved means doing whatever you have the capacity to do. Sometimes organizing is long and challenging, sometimes it's short and sweet. The thing is, there's different recommendations for different types of organizing. A post like this really can't get any more specific, because organizing is actually that broad of a topic.
Arm yourself to defend yourself and others from random acts of political violence. Use the arms to defend drag time story hour. Use the arms to protect the people you care about. Use the arms to watch cops. Get a gun, learn how to use it, and then only use it in emergency self defense. Having a substantial presence of guns at a protest against capital is already self defense, because cops know they can't push the crowd too much. That's why you shouldn't wait for tanks to be rolling through before you arm yourself.
Mutual aid is part of organizing, and will become incredibly important over the next few years. If you want more insight then I recommend reading Kropotkin's book on the matter.
If you're looking for someone to follow, I recommend following yourself and your ideals. It's very obvious that the point of the post is to take action, not to follow OP.
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(3 replies)
What is the goal you're trying to achieve? A more democratic government?
Cause it sure as hell looks like the majority of the population isn't against fascism anymore.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Right now. I'm done with this shit.
Bold of you to assume I have my shit together enough to do any of this. Sounds nice though, and I wish you all the best.
We have to do both things. we have to get everyone we possibly can paying attention and work on peaceful ways to move ideas forward. i'm gonna keep saying make unions the base of* the dems. and point to minnesota who still has the democratic farmer labor party and pulles off some neat* shit.
there simply are not enough people available to do it quickly. it always ends with the people we claim to want to help being hurt. and we end up piled on top of them by some authoritarian we made a deal with.
now if you want to discuss disruptive actions that could need to be taken over the next few years. especially while throwing out the word arming. i'd like to kindly remind you we are in an armed police state on a Public. Fucking. Server. and point out that molitivcocktail hour does not announce itself and is never the option WE choose.
It's been more than enough for a while now.
view more: next ›