this post was submitted on 22 Oct 2024
1157 points (97.6% liked)

News

23223 readers
3247 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 19 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

And the Veterans for Trump organization of course had this to say on the matter:

 

 

[–] [email protected] 59 points 1 day ago (9 children)

How the hell is he winning so much of the Black and Hispanic vote? Like... any percentage at all?

[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

A higher percent of the Hispanic support than any republican nominee in history (as high as 45%) with closest next being George W. Bush.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

...and as low as 29% - depending on which polls you look at. The important thing is to make it seem like a close race so people will keep looking at ads.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

That only counts Latino RV in swing states, excluding Georgia. And it's 31% not 29%. That means it's not counting the vast majority of Latino voters in the states with the largest Latino populations, notably California, Florida, Texas, or New York. That's hardly a representative sample. This is the definition of selectively cherry-picking data to support your point.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

This is the definition of cherry-picking data to support your point.

"As high as 45%" is another definition of cherry-picking. Here are two articles citing polls that say Harris and Trump are tied and Harris leads Trump, both from the same day. That's the definition of "depending on which polls you look at."

Calling whatever contradicts you "cherry picking" is the definition of denial.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Do they just not know that he's trying to kill them?

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 day ago

Surely this leopard won't eat MY face!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Hispanics have a very high population of religious voters and many of them don't believe in abortion. For many religious people, even if they disagree handily with everything else the Republican party does, they will not vote Democrat because of the abortion issue.

There was a pretty large research study and a bunch of podcasts on it.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago

This! My guess is that being religious and conservative is at least 75% of the reason why Hispanics would support Trump. My father was a Colombian born immigrant who in my memory always supported the Republican party and the majority of the years after he got his citizenship I'm certain he never voted Democrat. He did come around though before passing in 2023 and I'm pretty sure he did not support or vote for Trump. >

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

He's not, he had higher polling with African Americans in the last two elections than actual voters, he had extremely low voting numbers with African Americans, slightly higher with men, but not by that much, it's really common in politics to have a lot of people doing shady bullshit to see if it will sway elections, also the population nation wide is low enough that getting a sample size that's actually representative is not likely, even some trusted unbiased polling was using the opinion of one single person to represent all polling numbers in a whole state and the poll was pretty old by that point as well, so with African Americans you see a lot of really strange lookin poll numbers, but believe me, Trump going after Haitian refugees with racist tropes about ''savage'' and voodoo bullshit made him quite vile to antiracists of all stripes, I don't think those numbers are going to pan out at all.

Now Hispanics, that's a whole different story, being Hispanic myself I can tell you, it's not a solid voting block. We aren't as good at consistently voting in our own interests. There's light skinned people who think they're white enough to be in the whites only club, racism isn't hard to find among Hispanics, many do hate African Americans and others, so the white identifying crowd can be pretty similar to racist whites in a lot of ways, you also have Hispanics that are very concerned with hyper mauculinity and want the strongest man, and only think in terms of displays vs substance, and there's deeply religious Hispanics who can get drawn in with the evangelical rhetoric. So your not going to see a big percentage on one vote or issue with Hispanics, it's always going to be a mixed bag even with Trump's promise too deport more Hispanics from the US regardless of legal status, or his call backs to ''operation wetback'' or this bullshit, you just won't see big sweeping numbers from Hispanics it will always be slip up.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Because most people don't follow politics that closely and are simply unaware of stories like this, but are vulnerable to the forces of nostalgia and false memories of the first Trump administration, plus lingering fondness from the character he played on the Apprentice.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

If Harris loses, I know the fact that they didn't constantly run ads showing the Pandemic of 2020 asking "Do you really wanna go back to THIS?" is partially to blame

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago

I love how Bonespurs is campaigning so hard for Kamala Harris. It's good to see him doing something useful for a change!

[–] [email protected] 39 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Trump was reportedly still irked by the bill later that same day, with him claiming that Guillén’s grieving family was trying to take advantage of his wealth.

“Can you believe it?” he said, according to a witness. “F---ing people, trying to rip me off.”

So this is rather telling, him thinking that the "money of the US government" is "my money"

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 day ago

This is because he desperately is clinging to the ancient ideal (and I mean ANCIENT. Like early Middle Ages ancient) that everything in the kingdom is the direct and personal property of the king.

So in that sense, the billions of dollars allocated to the military every year is actually his money.

[–] [email protected] 52 points 1 day ago

Just one more thing that should absolutely torpedo any political career, that won't hurt him at all. His MAGAt cultists probably think that was "speaking the truth" or some stupid shit like that. Anyone who would be bothered by his comments has abandoned him ages ago.

[–] [email protected] 63 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Trump reportedly complained later in the day that these “fucking people” are “trying to rip me off.”

He thinks it's his money.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 541 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (40 children)

This is not someone killed in battle:

Donald Trump raged when he learned the funeral bill for Vanessa Guillén—the U.S. soldier who was sexually harassed and horrifically murdered by a male soldier at Fort Hood in 2020—cost $60,000, a bombshell report revealed Tuesday.

Somehow knowing the circumstances of her death makes Trump's awful remark even nastier. Especially since he is a rapist.

Guillén, a 20-year-old American of Mexican ancestry from Houston, was buried in her hometown on Aug. 15, 2020. Months later, in December, Trump reportedly asked his advisers in a meeting, “Did they bill us for the funeral? What did it cost?"

When an aide responded “yes” with the bill’s total, Trump allegedly unraveled. “It doesn’t cost 60,000 bucks to bury a f---ing Mexican,” he said, according to people in the meeting who spoke to the Atlantic.

Trump says vile things every day but this has to be one of the vilest.

[–] [email protected] 154 points 2 days ago (8 children)

Damn, he was almost close to making a valid comment about how wildly overpriced funerals are today, then instead went full bore into super racism

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 168 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I hate this man more than words can express

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 76 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

But he definitely doesn’t think the same way about the people voting for him…

[–] [email protected] 3 points 20 hours ago

and voted for you

I never thought the leopards would eat MY face!

[–] [email protected] 51 points 2 days ago (4 children)

That's the main point I never understood about his voters. His political agenda and your political affiliation don't even matter. All you have to understand is that everything he does is for his own benefit. Nobody wants an egoist in charge in a smaller setting - why the fuck elect one as president?

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (37 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 day ago

Considering how he treated Ivana's grave I'm really not shocked that he'd be an asshole about someone he doesn't know at all.

[–] [email protected] 42 points 1 day ago

Oligarchy 101.

Treat public expenses like it's coming out your own pocket.

Treat the public purse like it's your own personal bank account.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 day ago

Somehow, some way, this orange clown makes me angrier everyday, even when I thought I'd seen the worst of him.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Trump cultists: "He isn't racist."

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 day ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Morbidly Addled Geriatric Assnuggets

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

He had his wife buried for a fraction and stuck her on his shit golf course

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 day ago (16 children)

Wtf are funerals that expensive?

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 day ago (2 children)

In the US, funeral homes try to get as much money out of you as possible because they know you are emotionally vulnerable. There are exposes on funeral homes having predatory services.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 day ago (3 children)

It should be noted that the article says it was attended by the mayor and city's police chief. I'm assuming quite a few more less notable people also came. I would also assume this increases the cost.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
[–] [email protected] 181 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

And the family he said it about continues to kiss his ass. What the fuck is wrong with people?

We are grateful for everything he has done and continues to do to support our troops.

Says the sister of the soldier who was sexually abused and slain at Fort Hood, TX.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 48 points 2 days ago

Like he'd pay any bill ever

[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 day ago (5 children)

"No, 60k is to bury a DEAD Mexican. The ones fucking generally don't want to be buried"

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›