Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
“I think she had a mission that she wanted to do,” Baier said after the interview. “Maybe she wanted to have a viral moment or pushback. She came to Fox News and she wanted to have a go-after-Donald-Trump viral moment that plays on a lot of other channels and on social media. She may have gotten that.”
Dude... you asked the questions about her stance on Trump. She just responded. The fact that you tried to play a game of "gotcha" and got called on it is your fault.
The fact that literally 1 second elapsed from her bringing up a Trump talking point and him cutting to footage that sanewashes it was the giveaway. Nobody is that good unless it was a set up for a dunk.
100% this.
Of course she was in a mission, you imbecile. Do you think she visited you because of your beautiful eyes?
He gave excellent dumbface during that interview.
NB: I'm open to a better word to describe that slack jawed expression of his.
Tuckercarlsyndrome
Bless you
Furrowed scowl and open mouth, nodding at all the wrong times.
Classic TCS.
I don't have any suggestions, I just wanted to thank you for introducing me to a new phrase. I had to look up what "NB" meant in this context.
(For others who are unfamiliar, it stands for the Latin phrase "nota bene.")
Sometimes I feel like the man has some hidden wing clips on the side/back of his head keeping his face as taught as it is.
Maybe he thinks he's Anderson Cooper?
Lol, he wishes
Most gouls on fox probably wish they were 1/10th as old money as Anderson Cooper.
ha, she spent most of her time talking about her policies and experience. it was faux news that kept bringing up the orange piece of shit.
if youre not drinking the flavor-aid anything you say about donald would be detrimental.
she spent most of her time trying to talk about her policies and experience
Fixed. Other coverage has pointed out that Trump would not have been treated the same way and allowed to ramble on about whatever. And Fox would have called it a brilliant answer.
Faux news bringing up such strawman questions like "My numbers say 50% of people hate you. Are you saying they are stupid?"
For those wondering, this was a real question. Her answer was great!
His segment should be called The Baier Minimum
I saw a clip of the part where she was talking about something Trump said and they played a clip with the quote edited out to show he “didn’t say it”, and it was infuriating that she didn’t just straight up call it out and say they edited the clip and cut off the relevant part. She just kept saying that the clip is not what he said.
He didn't admit anything.
"“I think she had a mission that she wanted to do,” Baier said after the interview. “Maybe she wanted to have a viral moment or pushback. She came to Fox News and she wanted to have a go-after-Donald-Trump viral moment that plays on a lot of other channels and on social media. She may have gotten that.”
That's not admitting she "won" anything. That's him bitching to the fox croud that "she wasn't here in good faith, she just wanted a clip for tictok and to bash Ultimate Lord God our Savior Trump."
Oh, it wasnt just a regular interview? Is something going on in the US these upcoming weeks?
Yeah it's the time every 4 years where we vote to decide "do you want someone who might raise taxes on billionaires, or do you want someone who would slit your mother's throat for a dollar?" And we always seem to get hung up on that decision.
-3 HP
-3 HP
-3 HP
van is immune to shoe
The donkey van will never die
Checkmate
Does he mean she was on a mission in a different way than he was, with all of Fox’s dubious assertions inextricably tied to each of his questions?
I mean it's not hard as long as you're paying attention. Pretty much everything the conservatives and centrist conservative "liberals" are using to convince their base are lies and exaggerations. They rely on basic logical fallacies that any seasoned debater should be able to recognize and shoot down the fallacies without engaging with them.
But that doesn't make for good entertainment, so usually they just move on from one fallacy to the next and interrupt anything heading towards fact and never actually debate anything of substance because they aren't there for that. They're there for ratings for their owners and advertisers. That includes the politicians as much as FOX News and the media outlets.
"She is strong and he is scared"
🤣