682
submitted 10 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] [email protected] 134 points 10 months ago

And, the cashiers can sit down. Which makes sense.

[-] [email protected] 84 points 10 months ago

cashiers aren't allowed to sit in usa?

[-] [email protected] 54 points 10 months ago

Only office workers and managers are allowed to sit. If you're in a customer-facing position with a chair, you're supposed to stand up when helping a customer.

[-] [email protected] 12 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

And as we all know, middle management does so much work and therefore deserve that right over everyone else.

(sorry I vomited in my mouth a little bit)

[-] [email protected] 7 points 10 months ago

When I worked retail, at one of the stores you weren't allowed to drink water where customers could see you. I chose to ignore that rule and only got chewed out when the store owner happened to be nearby

[-] [email protected] 40 points 10 months ago

Cashier stations with chairs are VERY rare, yes. The general trope is that managers/owners think it makes workers appear lazy.

[-] [email protected] 26 points 10 months ago

Not at most places. At some point, someone told all the MBAs that it makes the customers mad if the employees look lazy or some shit.

[-] [email protected] 17 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

They also tend to make them stand at the beginning of their lane when they don't have customers. Apparently a light signaling that they are available just isn't enough.

Edit: My bad. I've never seen this at Aldi or Lidl. Just other US chains like Food Lion.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] [email protected] 21 points 10 months ago

No, and even worse "if you have time to lean, you have time to clean"

[-] [email protected] 8 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Well, turns out I do have PTSD from a decade of working retail and food service. So thanks for that lol

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 14 points 10 months ago

It’s this bizarre thing. Management want them to “look busy” or some bullshit. Aldi looks busy.

You’ll see this on some factory floors too. No chairs even for the management or QA logging numbers on computers. Chairs are for break time or some such.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 14 points 10 months ago

In California, companies are required by law to provide them seating and let them sit down, but most everywhere else they are expected to stand.

[-] [email protected] 11 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Corporations make that decision. And our country allows (if not encourages) it.

Yes, seriously. Same goes with drinking water behind the counter.

[-] bdonvr 9 points 10 months ago

Other than Aldi, pretty much no.

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] [email protected] 69 points 10 months ago

good for them. that's how you get quality workers and reduce turnover

[-] [email protected] 11 points 10 months ago

They're finally catching up with my local burger chain that offers health insurance, tuition, etc. Also in the US.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] [email protected] 51 points 10 months ago

"up to $23 an hour".... Doing a whole lotta heavy lifting in this headline.

How is it sane to list the maximum you can make, vs what to expect day 1?!

[-] [email protected] 30 points 10 months ago

It reads like the minimum went from $18 to $23. So the minimum is up from $18, to $23.

[-] [email protected] 16 points 10 months ago

Aldi announced that it it looking to hire thousands of new workers, as well as increasing their minimum wage to $18 and $23 an hour.

My read on this, is that they are discussing the minimum for two separate positions. Potentially cashier and team leader. Would make sense as they don't have many employees on shift at a time.

[-] [email protected] 8 points 10 months ago

Ah that could be. Either way, $23 isn't the max

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 14 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I hope so. It would be a nice change compared to... Well... Everything.

Edit: ahhhh see it now. I read it as "up to" alone, but implied "increased to" instead.

English is hard sometimes.

[-] [email protected] 10 points 10 months ago

It really is. The fact "up to" can mean either a maximum value, or an increase to a value, is stupid.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 9 points 10 months ago

That's just being read wrong, it's not written like a "save up to $10" kind of line. The "up" just describes the change (i.e. 'the starting wage is going up; becoming $X'). Within the article, it's completely unambiguous:

The national average starting wages for Aldi workers will be set at $18 an hour and $23 an hour for warehouse workers.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 34 points 10 months ago

It is telling that Aldi is successfully expanding in the USA while keeping the same model that made it big in its home market of Germany and the rest of Europe.

When Walmart tried to gain a foothold in Germany, it hemorrhaged billions before giving up. The managers responsible covered their asses with bullshit about cultural differences or unions, but the truth is that they just couldn't offer competitive prices. Looks like, even in the US, shoppers favor low prices over wasteful frills like greeters.

[-] [email protected] 20 points 10 months ago

Greeters are literally a charitable expense (that they've mostly replaced with security goons) the wasteful frills in Walmart are executive compensation and benefits.

[-] [email protected] 11 points 10 months ago

hahahah right? I was like 'uh...I don't think that's where all the money's disappearing to my guy...'

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 27 points 10 months ago

Their biz must be booming during this era of price gouging clown corpos

[-] [email protected] 25 points 10 months ago

We shop at Aldi a lot and, anecdotally, they seem to be the most reasonably priced by a pretty hefty margin.

[-] [email protected] 17 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

That's because ALDI doesn't cushion cost increases or sell loss leaders. If eggs shoot up in price 400% they immediately raise the price to match. Most grocery stores will try to eat at least some of that cost for some time hoping it will go down before they have to raise even further. That kind of pricing model means they need much larger margins on all their other products to afford that. Same way they sell milk and rotisserie chickens at a loss to get people in the store.

ALDI does not play those games and keeps their margins more consistent but their prices are more susceptible to spikes in costs.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] [email protected] 18 points 10 months ago

Did not know Aldi were in the States?

[-] [email protected] 22 points 10 months ago

Aldi Nord controlled stores in the US are Trader Joes, Aldi Sud stores in the US are just Aldi

[-] [email protected] 11 points 10 months ago

We have both Aldi here but they're differently named. One is just Aldi, the other is Trader Joe's.

It's our super low cost grocer, that has in recent years become more high quality. When I was a kid (80s-90s) it was like "never buy fresh anything there because it's all crap" but these days it's all pretty decent quality stuff. Not like farmstand good, but better than Walmart.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 11 points 10 months ago

Got one in my redneck suburb. We almost exclusively shop there.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 10 months ago

Yeah, they've been in Texas at least 20 years. Looks like they are in most of the states in the eastern half of the continental US and the states along the southern border.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] [email protected] 18 points 10 months ago

This is just in the USA, correct? Aldi in the EU is unaffected from what I can tell.

[-] [email protected] 19 points 10 months ago

I don’t mean this in an offensive way or a combative one, but the post title is using $ and the source is USA Today.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 15 points 10 months ago

LONG LIVE ALDI

[-] [email protected] 13 points 10 months ago

Damn. What's next, quality fresh foods with less harmful ingredients?

[-] [email protected] 12 points 10 months ago

I mean it is a german company, they might just standardize EU standards through out their company. At least this is a small pipe-dream I have had about them.

[-] [email protected] 10 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Great, now that they have bought winn-dixie, and are moving in places, mostly, where there are failed/failing regional chains, we will have even less competition.

Remember, despite saying Aldi does not discriminate based on union/desire to unionize, A LOT of their ex-management say they were straight up told to fire anyone who mentions it, and they would rather get sued for it, than allow it.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2024
682 points (99.6% liked)

Work Reform

12992 readers
12 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS