this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2024
113 points (98.3% liked)

politics

22186 readers
310 users here now

Protests, dual power, and even electoralism.

Labour and union posts go to [email protected].

Take the dunks to /c/strugglesession or [email protected].

[email protected] is good for shitposting.

Do not post direct links to reactionary sites.

Off topic posts will be removed.

Follow the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember we're all comrades here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 week ago (1 children)

send politicians to prison for climate crimes dean-neutral

send billionaires to gulag for climate crimes dean-smile

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 week ago

:wow-two-cakes:

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I got better, more efficient, and environmentally friendly idea that produces organic fertilizer!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

damn I came in here to just say "Yes" but I like your idea.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 week ago (2 children)

72% is shockingly high tbh. Makes me think the question wasn't phrased well. Or maybe the chuds in other G20 countries don't shit their pants if you mention that climate change is real?

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Occam's Razor. "Should we send politicians to jail--" "Yes" "--for climate crimes? "

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 week ago (2 children)

We can see the phrasing, at least in English:

It should be a criminal offence for leaders of large businesses or senior government officials to approve or permit actions they know are likely to cause damage to nature and climate that is widespread, long term or cannot ​be reversed

The responses “Strongly agree” and “Tend to agree” with the statement are the 72%

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

that they know

How do we prove, definitively, what they knew at the time?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

Looking at their emails and other messages to see if those risks were communicated and ignored. Forcing them to produce documents researching and stating their potential impact before they're allowed to undergo certain actions. Using common sense like "dumping garbage in a river is bad".

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 week ago (2 children)

"Prison" is what I named this bottomless pit I found.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago

A environmentally safe, deep underground, long-term storage solution for dangerous waste.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 week ago

we should call it club 33 and charge people $50k to enter

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Damn, with that kind of broad public support I'm sure we'll see a proposal to form a committee to decide on a schedule for forming an investigative branch to define a legislative framework to implement such a program before 2050!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

our petition.org page has hundreds of signatures! any day now!