this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2024
113 points (98.3% liked)
politics
22251 readers
331 users here now
Protests, dual power, and even electoralism.
Labour and union posts go to [email protected].
Take the dunks to /c/strugglesession or [email protected].
[email protected] is good for shitposting.
Do not post direct links to reactionary sites.
Off topic posts will be removed.
Follow the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember we're all comrades here.
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
72% is shockingly high tbh. Makes me think the question wasn't phrased well. Or maybe the chuds in other G20 countries don't shit their pants if you mention that climate change is real?
Occam's Razor. "Should we send politicians to jail--" "Yes" "--for climate crimes? "
We can see the phrasing, at least in English:
The responses “Strongly agree” and “Tend to agree” with the statement are the 72%
How do we prove, definitively, what they knew at the time?
Looking at their emails and other messages to see if those risks were communicated and ignored. Forcing them to produce documents researching and stating their potential impact before they're allowed to undergo certain actions. Using common sense like "dumping garbage in a river is bad".