this post was submitted on 10 Aug 2024
199 points (99.5% liked)

News

23266 readers
3011 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A Defense Department disagreement over how to bring to justice the accused mastermind of the Sept. 11 attacks and two others has thrown the cases into disarray and surfaced tension between the desire of some victims’ families to see a final legal reckoning and the significant obstacles that may make that impossible.

Defense lawyers and some legal experts blame many of the endless delays on what they call the “original sin” haunting the military prosecutions: the illegal torture that Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and his co-defendants were subjected to in CIA custody. That years-old abuse has snarled the case, leaving lawyers to hash out legal issues two decades later in the now often-forgotten military courtrooms at the U.S. base at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.

An approved plea bargain sparing Mohammed and two co-defendants from the death penalty appeared to clear those hurdles and push the cases toward conclusion. But after criticism of the deal from some family members and Republican lawmakers, Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin on Aug. 2 revoked the deal signed by the official he had appointed.

all 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 41 points 2 months ago

I think we all knew they were going to die in a Gitmo cage.

Most Americans probably approve since they think vengeance is the proper response to any wrong.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 2 months ago (1 children)

There's also the fact that much of their evidence is "some guy in Syria". You can't bring that into a courtroom.

These people will never be convicted in a fair trial.

A plea deal where they spend the rest of their lives in prison gets us out of this stain on our democracy. And their only demands were that they could eat and pray as a group. They were never leaving prison.

But we can't do the right thing because it's political suicide. Dems tested the waters, and Republicans immediately jumped on it. Dems don't trust voters to see the nuance through the Republican soundbites.

These aren't the hijackers, btw. You know where they are.

This American Life and Serial have great podcasts about this.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Most of the people held are "close enough". Unfortunately the American people don't care.

The place should be closed and allow them a public court in the US.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

A public court is more likely to let them go free. We can't convict them in a trial following our laws. Now that is political suicide.

Those terrorists are the third rail. I'm surprised the Dems got this close to a plea deal just because it's the right thing to do and the only reasonable way out.

Maybe November or December when there's time for nuance to sink in over soundbites.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Honestly most should be free. I know it is political suicide like making police reform. You don't want to sound the dog whistle for the racist

[–] [email protected] -3 points 2 months ago (3 children)

You know they orchestrated 9/11, right?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago

No, we don't know that. First, not even the military claims that all of the detainies orchestrated 9/11 (which is a much stronger claim then merely being involved).

Second, do we really trust the portion of military that violated domestic law, violated international human rights law, lied to congress about it, and fought for decades against bringing cases to trial?

Is it more likely than not that a given inmate there is a terrorist? Probably. But that is not the standard for indefinite imprisonment.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago

And Shrub Sr orchestrated the Iraqi war, based on multiple lies told by him and his administration, where over 4500 Americans were killed. Yet I don't see him in jail for life.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago

There is a press video about the first drone strike on bin laden life. They believed they killed him with another man. It was two farmers that looked "Muslim." That was our standard.

Listen to the Pakistani kid talk to congress about how he loves cloudy day bc that is when they know they are safe.

Our history has done countless killings to innocent people. We still haven't deal with Saudi Arabia which supported 9/11.

We don't care about justice, we care about money and dog whistles.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago

You can't use any witness testimony, because all the witnesses have been tortured or are worried about torture or death. That is unavailable. So ... Better hope you have enough digital spy data. And where can you find an unbiased jury? Not in the US, that's for damn sure.

And the penalty for torture? The charges get dropped with prejudice. Sigh.

So yeah, no US courts.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I was listening to an NPR thing and I was kind of blown away how even Biden was surprised. Apparently no one told him he was planning on making the decision before doing it.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

When a Defense Secretary makes a decision like that without POTUS' go ahead you know things are fucked up.

Austin should have been dumped immediately over that shit.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

The TLAs never care what POTUS thinks. This has been true for decades.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

It's important to realize Republicans don't want it cleared out. They know if the last prisoners are moved to normal prisons on plea deals the Democrats will try to shut the place down. The republicans want to expand it instead.