this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2024
212 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

1185 readers
580 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

[email protected]
[email protected]


Icon attribution | Banner attribution

founded 10 months ago
MODERATORS
 

The number of states blocked by Pornhub will soon nearly double.

all 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] The2500 69 points 3 months ago (1 children)

A little while ago I saw a map of the states where they colored in how likely a state is to pass anti-trans legislation. It was identical to Pornhubs map of how likely people in a state are to search for trans-porn. To the surprise of no one.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago

Pffftt... projection, schmojection.

Amiright guys?....

[–] [email protected] 55 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 53 points 3 months ago (2 children)

There's a phrase that used to be used to defend gun rights, 'If you outlaw guns only outlaws will have guns.'

If you make porn illegal only illegal porn will exist. They're not eliminating porn they're just shifting the source of porn to websites that don't care about compliance with US laws.

[–] [email protected] 47 points 3 months ago (2 children)

the only way to stop a bad guy with porn is with a good guy with porn.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 months ago (1 children)

This is 100% true. Its like with weed. People will consume it. They don't care if its illegal. Illegal weed only causes the black market to control everything and fuck up consumers.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Marijuana is much easier to control as it is physical and lingers in the body. It is physical vs digital.

You can copy and download data all day long. It is the same reason why banning encryption will not make encryption go away overnight.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, but the principle is literally the same.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It literally isn't. Weed leaves a trace everywhere it goes as it is a physical substance

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I definitely leave a trace everywhere after watching porn

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Wet wipes are helpful if you'd rather not.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

Ironically, yes!

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago

I would be ENTIRELY unsuprised if we found out these state governments were full of people who bought a lot of VPN company stocks just before the news hit. Particularly Utah. It's practically free money.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 3 months ago (2 children)

If you remove the porn from the internet, there will be one site left, and it will be called Bring Back The Porn.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Shit shit shit, this one's really rolling around. Dr cox? It feels Monty Python, but I'm hearing it in John C McGinley's over affected JD drawl.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago

It is Dr Cox

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

It is Dr Cox.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

The porn will never even go away. Pornhub might be popular but it's a fraction of a fraction of a fraction of the porn out there.

If you removed the porn from the internet, the very next day a hundred million people will all create their own new internet and finally have a noble purpose for their saved stashes.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 3 months ago

Pornhub prepares to be accessed via VPN from five more states rather than check IDs

[–] [email protected] 21 points 3 months ago (2 children)

In all honesty i can only hope that this forces some people to increase their tech-savviness.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I miss the Internet when you needed to know wtf you were doing. Now everything is geared for easy, addictive consumption

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

I keep telling older people who seek IT advice from me that knowing how your computer works is like knowing how your car works. And then I tell them that they're the morons who think the engine is magic, and never change their oil until the car's in the shop with issues and the mechanic finds what looks like mud in the engine.

Boomers hear that message, it turns out.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

I read somewhere that a lot of people don't even go to websites anymore, they just use apps for their social media and have no idea how to enter a web address or URL.

I feel like the last of a dying breed of mighty wizards because I can configure windows and know how to manage files.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

It won't. The average person in America wants the fastest, easiest consumable distraction or pleasure reward and takes no time to learn new things unless it's dangled in front of them in bite-sized, easy-to-follow tutorials with quest-markers and all kinds of sparkles and chimes when they do something correctly.

They will go to some really terrible alternative that costs money. There are a hundred thousand porn sites right now hoping that they become the next big thing from all this.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Fuck them states.

Pornhub will lose more traffic to complying with the nanny bullshit than blocking entire states.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Pornhub's audience is international, and in some countries they are far, far less backwards and socially repressed and Pornhub and similar companies get revenue without any controversy or danger of consequences.

They do NOT need these shitty states that are just going to continue to pearl-clutch and scream about "morality" as if humans aren't sexual creatures.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago

Your mom is a sexual creature.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 months ago

Just as the state legislatures wanted. This lets them ban pornhub without having to fight with their citizens about banning pornhub.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

#1 VPN states. State Tracking will never be popular outside the religious legislative class, everyone else knows it's an invasion of privacy.

Microsoft security leaks put paid to any hope of security/privacy on govt. databases.

What's the over/under for state legislators on pornsites?

[–] [email protected] -5 points 3 months ago (2 children)

State Tracking will never be popular outside the religious legislative class, everyone else knows it’s an invasion of privacy.

Why won't those people vote against the religious legislative class? Are they outnumbered?

Anti Commercial-AI license

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago

At a guess, gerrymandering. Absurdly defined district maps are used to split up areas where the opposition is strong and drown them with surrounding friendly voters.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

Why won't those people vote against the religious legislative class? Are they outnumbered?

For a lot of people religion is like a salad bar or buffet, they pick and choose the parts they like and ignore the ones they don't. That seems to extend towards their politicians, be my brand of religion and policy and I'll let you do almost anything because at least you aren't that other person.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago

That thumbnail is more like arse technica

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago

If you live in a conservative run state, watch what they do, in Georgia on the final day of legislation they do "sine die" which we sometimes call sign or die day where they just push through a ton of shit with little or no going over it before hand, they passed one of these social media ID laws that targets porn too, and it went through without pretty much anybody knowing about it from what I can tell.

What kind of database of depravity to use against you are these people building.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Pornhub should block more states.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago

Right!? Make this the election that was decided by porn!

May every porn site block every republican-lead district this election season with a full-page message stating that this is a direct result of republican policy. Then link to voting resources.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Rape rates declined following the code spread availability of internet porn, I wonder if they will go higher in the stupid states (I live in one). Obviously, VPNs neuter the impact of the laws some, but not everyone is savvy enough to use them. I feel bad for adolescent boys.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

the point of this was moronic to begin with 5 years ago during the first porn purge

"zomg there might be human traffickers and p3doph1les uploading porn!"---okay, don't you want them to do that? Like, doesn't it just give you more evidence and a stronger trail if the traffickers have an easily accessible outlet to satisfy their ego urges? Wouldn't it enable you to catch some traffickers that would've otherwise been missed, just by looking at their account info, upload IP, etc?

This is like banning chip sales to China except sex crime version