219
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
top 45 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] [email protected] 86 points 1 year ago

The ONLY way to Prevent this is if EVERY child goes Swimming with a Gun so they can shoot ANYONE ELSE who has a gun because it's UNCONSTITUTIONAL to ensure ONLY good people have guns!

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

They'll have to give them waterproof guns though.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Why not just wear heavy bulletproof vests while swimming?

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

If only there were some way to make changes to the constitution. Some kind of way to amend it

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

If we can get 2/3 of states to request it, and 3/4 of them to ratify it, sure…

[-] [email protected] 74 points 1 year ago

How many more lives will be sacrificed at the altar of the second amendment before something meaningful happens?

[-] [email protected] 33 points 1 year ago
[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Yeah, that sounds about right... This fuckin country...

[-] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago

Look, what's more important here, the lives of children or a piece of metal and/or plastic?

[-] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

All objects matter!

[-] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago

This country will break before anything meaningful happens, just like with chattel slavery.

[-] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago

Most of them?

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Sad fact: Until someone starts killing the children of rich white people, nothing will change.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Nope they have a playbook for that too. Although it’s why Sandy hook parents won the billion dollar lawsuit. But it’s also why the Trumpets are pushing for suspension of habeas corpus if he wins.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Depending on how November goes it might not matter anymore.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

At the moment, about 82k a year.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I'd say around 100k

[-] [email protected] 74 points 1 year ago

And not a "good guy" gun owner in sight.

It's almost like deregulating firearms isn't stopping mass shootings.

[-] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago

Okay hear me out, the reason for such tragedies is logical. Kids have no guns to fight back! It's just like if you had a guy pointing a gun at you. If you had a gun of your own, you could distract them with a handful of dust and then shoot back. Same for the kids. If they had guns they could defend themselves.

Next we'll discuss the vulnerability of animals such as whales and hummingbirds as it relates to their lack of usable fingers for trigger pulling.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

The school boards got rid of PE classes so that schoolchildren could focus on trigger finger crunches specifically.

Essential skills, and all that.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

So the kids need a gun AND dust?

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

That person seems to be underestimating how difficult it is to keep a pocketful of dust safe at the splash pad!

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Well dust is cheaper than pocket sand so....

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Sand is 7 bucks for 50 pounds. Dust will poof its way out of your pocket over time. Sand will stay put forever. Don't skimp on your safety, buy the pocket sand.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

The data shows that a vigilante will be a hero only in one of 7,000 cases of gun violence. I don't see data showing how often the instigator of gun violence has a carry permit.

But this tells us two things:

  • the rate of Good Guy Gun bros is super small

  • there are so many cases of mass shootings in America that 1:7000 can be calculated

Is America holding back on accessible healthcare because it would then need to address the prevalence of guns in America, or have they heard of mandatory multi-million-dollar 3rd party life insurance for gun owners? There's even a company named liberty that may insure them.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Also missing from those stats are the stats on how often someone tries to be a hero and either makes a dangerous situation worse or misreads the situation entirely and makes a peaceful situation violent.

The well regulated militia part was pretty important and the judge(s) that ruled it wasn't should have been impeached for overextending his power.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

No. It's a money thing

[-] [email protected] 26 points 1 year ago

Oh, well if there were kids I guess the republicans are gonna protect them.

[-] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago

Only unborn ones- ones outside the womb can pull themselves up by the bootstraps and learn to defend themselves. /s

[-] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Only unborn and in the womb, though. Note the ridiculous push against IVF recently 🤪

[-] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago

Plenty of straps on these boots. Just lazy babies. Get a job, you’re 18—months old.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Someone ought to make this a meme! 🤪😝

[-] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago

Protect? I think you mean molest

[-] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

That’s the same word?

—every Republican, Christian

[-] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago
[-] [email protected] -3 points 1 year ago

Might as well report on every car related death at this point

this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2024
219 points (98.2% liked)

News

30835 readers
2446 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS