117
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

The prophecy is fulfilled! elmofire

all 23 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] [email protected] 91 points 1 year ago

But ranchers in Montana have long opposed increasing the Yellowstone herds or transferring the animals to tribes. Republican Gov. Greg Gianforte has said he would not support any management plan with a population target greater than 3,000 Yellowstone bison.

That's interesting because I have long opposed any increase to the population of white people in Montana.

[-] [email protected] 49 points 1 year ago

i have a deep hatred for cattle ranching and the people that do it. cattle grazing is incredibly destructive alone, not including the elimination of predator species like wolves that wrought havoc on Yellowstone. all so Americans can eat an unholy amount of beef

[-] [email protected] 34 points 1 year ago

Bison have been an integral part of Native American cultures. Settlers killed as many bison as they could in an attempt to starve the natives and destroy their culture. In many regards, native American's acted as the Bison's natural predator, because their culture is so heavily intertwined with nature. Settlers stole that from them. So it's not as simple as "cattle grazing" it's a colonized people's way of protecting their culture

[-] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago

They're mad about the colonizers' cattle-grazing taking land and resources away from the colonizees' potential bison-grazing land. Cattle is the specific name for the animal beef comes from, it's not an umbrella term for anything that grazes.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Yeah, I was just making sure they weren't conflating the two. I know alot of the more hard-core vegans tend to put all meat consumption on the same moral barometer.

[-] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago

It can be done in a non-shitty way. Most people don't, so if you want all the ranchers against the wall, I get it.

Look up AMP grazing if you're interested.

[-] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago

or we could just not exploit animals altogether

[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

honestly the fuck does this rant have to do with protecting the bison population

[-] [email protected] 44 points 1 year ago

I am once again demanding that we feed the ranchers to the wolves and unfence Aemrica.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

That's interesting because I have long opposed any increase to the population of white people in ~~Montana.~~ EVERYWHERE

ftfy

[-] [email protected] 61 points 1 year ago

I hope this means better times for the Lakota and not better times for their colonizers

[-] [email protected] 38 points 1 year ago

To hear them tell it, it's better times for humans, not specific classes of humans

[-] [email protected] 35 points 1 year ago

ah seems like better times for the Lakota then

[-] [email protected] 29 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

In 1994 a white bison was born

5 years later the white man got their asses whooped by an F5 tornado

shrug-outta-hecks

[-] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

And only two years after that? 9/11. Coincidence? You decide.

[-] [email protected] 26 points 1 year ago

Would be nice.

[-] [email protected] 48 points 1 year ago

geordi-no birth of a red calf portending the eschaton

geordi-yes birth of a white calf portending better times

[-] [email protected] 26 points 1 year ago
[-] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago

I’ve been told about this one. Non-natives like to think the white buffalo woman was an actual white woman with blonde hair and blue eyes lol

[-] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

The calf is so CUTE! quokka-smile

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Theres gonna be a terrible tornado or something

this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2024
117 points (100.0% liked)

news

24094 readers
905 users here now

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --

-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --

-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today/ . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --

-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--

-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--

-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --

-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS