freagle

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

While totally fair, we also have the recent military agreement between Russia and Korea. It's not entirely clear why the US would be lying about it as it's not clear what they could really do with it. I can see Zelensky using it to try to get the US more involved, but I don't see the US angle here. Help me?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think that's actually going to be pretty difficult. It would be a true triumph of counterintelligence to pull that off.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 day ago

Also remember that "privatization" was coined to describe what the Euro fascists did in their economy. Do deprivatize is essentially antifa

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I think it might get partitioned like Germany did. It would help the Western narrative engine to draw those parallels and it would allow the West to continue operating and building power while requiring Russia's constant attention.

Russia cannot occupy Ukraine and is unlikely to physically invade and occupy Kyiv directly. It is also unlikely that Russia will spend the resources to do to Ukraine what the US did to Korea.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 day ago

I doubt the election will truly change what happens in Ukraine. It's just a question of the angle of the spin

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Everyone except the European power structure IS imagining it. Literally it's the stated reason for Korea developing nukes - so that it can pursue everything else without the West choosing to bomb it back to the stone age for second time.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Sounds like a 2-year-long rope-a-dope

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 day ago (4 children)

At this point, I think the Korean troops are there not only to get critical experience but as a reserve force so that Russia can push forward without leaving the homeland under-protected.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago

LOL. A perfectly reasonable post and the only thing you can respond with is an ableist ad hominem. Good luck navigating the world around you !

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I dunno. Highly motivated, highly incentivized, backed by the most productive nations on the planet. I think those of us in the West are used to tranformative things taking forever because of the incompetence and the lack of incentives for the powers that be, and we forget how quickly our nations do transform things to harm us - DMCA, domestic surveillance, sharing intelligence, privatizing water, destroying habitats, etc.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

The US is constantly repeating propaganda domestically and abroad all day every day. The least the UN can do is remain consistent in countering the narrative.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago
39
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

Ukraine, Niger, Palestine, Mali, Syria...

[Edit] Egypt, Haiti...

Is it going down?

[Edit] where else am I forgetting?

 

Using the web client in Firefox, I cannot seem to expand comments below a certain level. Clicking "3 more comments ->" just spins. Any ideas?

 

This guy is the researcher cited: https://www.sheffield.ac.uk/seas/people/academic-staff/david-tobin

At first glance, he seems somewhat legit, but I've never heard of him before. What do we know about this guy, his research, and what's the best way to understand these claims?

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.zip/post/863212

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.zip/post/863209

Archived version: https://archive.ph/5Ok1c
Archived version: https://web.archive.org/web/20230731013125/https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-66337328

 

This is truly a wild analysis. It's entirely plausible that Black rock owns the longs and Citadel owns the shorts and that they collaborate. But just the circular ownership leading to total dominance of the market by a few hundred people is enough to make this worth reading.

 

Supposedly the largest in history. Inching ever closer to nuclear war.

 

This feels like an op to me. The timing is uncanny. If this story develops, I predict some escalation of current conflicts with some advanced weaponry (chemical, biological, nuclear, energy, space-based, etc) and the alien story to be used as cover.

Alternatively, it's a continuation of reactionary mobilization propaganda. Thought?

 

Anyone got any more insight into this? Hypersonics are supposed to be a significant advantage for both Russia and China. If the West has a counter for these, that seems real bad.

view more: next ›