529
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

A user on the online forum 4chan has leaked a massive 270GB of data purportedly belonging to The New York Times. This leak includes what is claimed to be the source code for the newspaper’s digital operations.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] [email protected] 178 points 1 year ago
[-] [email protected] 120 points 1 year ago

"send nodes"

[-] [email protected] 26 points 1 year ago
[-] [email protected] 41 points 1 year ago

Node has been around longer than web3

NPM nightmares intensify

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago

270GB of mostly node modules?

[-] [email protected] 52 points 1 year ago

You're right, it would be bigger if it was node

[-] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

Sounds pretty average

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] [email protected] 98 points 1 year ago

reminds me of the time someone said "Who is this 4chan?" on tv and it became a meme. good times

[-] [email protected] 32 points 1 year ago
[-] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

https://www.piped.video/watch?v=qz5i171h_no

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

He can't keep getting away with it.

[-] [email protected] 55 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

270GB feels insane for the source code of a single organisation. Is there media assets or backups in there too?

EDIT: yep, multiple subsidiaries and slack Comms which could inflate it by a lot. we post a whole lot of uncompressed shit on our slack

[-] [email protected] 53 points 1 year ago

NY Times has a freaking great data visualisations, they are (were?) employing a wizard in this space, doing custom extensions on d3.js.

[-] [email protected] 47 points 1 year ago

Source code... for a website?

[-] [email protected] 113 points 1 year ago

Subscription software. Tracking software. Ad tools. Promotion tools. Tools for journalists.

The website is just what you see.

[-] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago

Yeah, I guess I didn't consider all the other operational shit that goes into providing content and funding for the website.

[-] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago

It’s why our PCs have gotten insanely fast but websites still load like fucking trash. All the back end spying shit takes up a ton of cpu cycles. If you don’t already have em run ublock origin and no script and the internet is so fucking speedy 😆

[-] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

I hadn't noticed but then again I run Ublock Origin on Firefox.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Yeah. You got yourself covered no script helps with JavaScript being pesky. But breaks a lot of shit tbh.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] [email protected] 66 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Anything more complicated than a static website is going to have a significant amount of server-side code.

Also, the article explains that it's not just the website, but ALL of their repos, which would include their smartphone apps, backend tools, etc.

[-] [email protected] 40 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I doubt this will affect much ... that's a lot more source code than I'd expect though, dang.

Presumably a lot of it is for internal operations (custom editing software or something of that ilk).

[-] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago

It sounds like it's not all source code, from the article.

[-] [email protected] 39 points 1 year ago

Now everyone will get to run Wordle!

[-] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

In case anyone missed the hubbub: [ETA: This is from March 2024; unconnected to this hack/leak]

https://apnews.com/article/new-york-times-wordle-clones-takedown-dmca-35d32b7548f7312ea74a2065b2cd31a6

The Times has filed several Digital Millennium Copyright Act, or DMCA, takedown notices to developers of Wordle-inspired games, which cited infringement on the Times’ ownership of the Wordle name, as well as its look and feel — such as the layout and color scheme of green, gray and yellow tiles.

Numerous impacted developers have also taken to social media to share their frustrations. Many said that their games, which range from Wordle-like offerings in other languages to more guessing games, would be taken down as a result.

Still, Brauneis said he believes the Times’ arguments for Wordle copyright infringement are on “a little bit shaky ground” for several reasons. Rules of a game, for example, are not covered by copyright — and that can include the layout of the game itself, he said.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

We still have no legal right to use, change and share its source code, control it both ourselves and in groups. It's still anti-libre software.

[-] [email protected] 59 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Anything that may help develop better adblockers/paywall bypasses or exposes how/what of our personal information is collected is a win in my book. And this may very well be none of those things.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Just seeing how something is approached helps.

I sometimes rebuild software from one language to another for practice.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago

Did this leak happen before or after NYT published an investigation detailing how Israeli forces were raping and torturing defenseless Palestinian detainees brought in from the Gaza Strip?

[-] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago

I have not read the news in a really long time just cause paywalls are annoying as frick.

[-] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

Consider paying for the news...?

[-] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago

I'd only do that if you want independent news.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

I'm not sure what you're saying here ...

[-] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

Pay for news if you want it to be independent, and not beholden to sponsors.

I'd go as far as to say that paying for news (if you have the means to do so comfortably), is your duty as a commitment to democracy.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Ahh, yes I agree on all points; thanks for the clarification!

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

You can go to archive.is and put in the url of a news story you want to read in the second box and it will usually let you bypass the paywall.

[-] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

I expect that paywall to be fully useless soon.

[-] [email protected] 34 points 1 year ago

That's a really silly take ... a Paywall is just an authorization mechanism.

That's like saying the source code of lemmy leaks and you expect your account to be compromised any second.

[-] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago

I can sell you a copy of lemmys source code, are you interested?

[-] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

I'll sell it for cheaper!

[-] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

I can give you 25 schmeckles.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

Oh. They stopped seeding the torrent at 85%...

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 07 Jun 2024
529 points (98.4% liked)

Technology

72262 readers
2702 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS