this post was submitted on 14 May 2024
191 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13446 readers
772 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank

Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here

Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Trying to shame a group of people for simply existing is actually just vile and resentful hate and not a part of "civil debate"? Who woulda thunk it?

all 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 44 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

Even if she was "debating" in good faith, there is no debate as to whether trans people exists... Fuck this soggy turd.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 4 months ago (1 children)

no reason to use sexist insults however

[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 months ago (1 children)

You’re right, my apologies. I was riffing and didn’t stop to think enough about the connotations.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 months ago

Comment has been cleared for upbearing rat-salute-2

[–] [email protected] 15 points 4 months ago

By Dios, she should be put to the wall and have the Mozambique drill tactic practiced upon 'er... again and again...

[–] [email protected] 43 points 4 months ago (1 children)

If I recall correctly, most of her proclamations on gender were very final in tone. As in not open for discussion.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 4 months ago

Yeah she did that all the time. "Trans women are just men in drag and are probably sex predators" isn't exactly asking a question or engaging in a debate. Fuck her.

[–] [email protected] 38 points 4 months ago

Henry Ford used to want to debate economics. Now he just writes screeds about the international jew.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Does she not realize that she's acting exactly like the Dursleys she mocked before?

[–] [email protected] 53 points 4 months ago (2 children)

From what I remember of the later books, it seems like her primary problem with the Dursleys just became that they were fat.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Sean (the skull) has an unnecessarily long video where he goes through everything that sucks about Harry Potter basically

And yes, after listening to his extended list of examples it's hard to conclude otherwise.

There's a lot of stuff in those books that flew under the radar 20+years ago when I was reading them

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago

Ugh, I guess that explains why Draco Malfoy was redeemed at the last minute. He was essentially one of the Dursleys, but it was okay because he was written to be conventionally attractive.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Sort of off-topic, but all of this reminds me of the time the UK media raised a stink about rightoids being called "gammons".

frothingfash: "Hey, the word gammon is elitist! Being a racist gammon is for the ugly poor people, so if you hate racism you hate poor people!"

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

sitting down to an exciting game of backremoved

[–] [email protected] 23 points 4 months ago

I was talking about how JKR is now with my Mom (who literally read a couple of the books out loud to me as a kid and we even went to the Deathly Hallows midnight release together) and she said JKR is like the Dursleys now.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Muggleborn steal magic, trans people steal femininity/masculinity, what is there to debate smuglord

[–] [email protected] 22 points 4 months ago

Can't wait for the Harry Potter reboot where Voldemort's the good guy.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 4 months ago

"Let's debate whether or not you can exist"

[–] [email protected] 23 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

"Hah, how wonderful! And how do they reply when you say you don't necessarily want them to die?"

"I don't say that."

shocked-pikachu

[–] [email protected] 20 points 4 months ago

JK out here like, “A toast to the troops. All the troops. Both sides.” Fair and balanced and feminist-pilled for real.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Chuds really like to virtue signal about "debate" and freeze-peach but it's really just a cover for legitimizing bigotry and fascism.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

And if you refuse to entertain that shit, they'll go on about how they "owned" you, but in actuality, they're like:

[–] [email protected] 16 points 4 months ago

Jowling Kowling Shit-Ass Fucking Rowling

[–] [email protected] 14 points 4 months ago

Whenever I've seen people say who they would love to reeducate Puyi style, I would love to see her go be reformed into a proper socialist citizen.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 4 months ago

Did she really change at all? Posey Galbraith comments within

[–] [email protected] 12 points 4 months ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago

Debating Gender

Insulting Trans People

same-picture

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

Do you think the dog is dead?