top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 227 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (4 children)

11th violation of gag order : lock him up.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 34 points 2 years ago

    He's not getting locked up. I doubt he'll even be sentenced to any time in a cell even if he's found guilty. He's not even going to get probation. He's going to completely show that the Justice system once again is not equal and fair but not for the reasons he will continue to whine about.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 32 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Lock him up and Epstein away the key.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 182 points 2 years ago (6 children)

    She detailed having met Trump at a golf tournament in 2006, when she was 27 years old and — as she tells it — Trump was already older than her father.

    I'm sorry to be pedantic, but wasn't he always older than her father? Like, that's how age works.

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 52 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    You should absolutely be pedantic about a paid, published article having writing like that. It’s not some random internet comment from someone who may or may not have graduated high school, this was approved by multiple people who allegedly went to college for the writing related jobs they have. It should at least pass the “does this make sense if you think about it at all for more than 5 seconds” test.

    And yeah I know reporters and writers facing the same overwork/underpay squeeze as everyone else. This is more about the corporations that run these papers and magazines being responsible for things deteriorating to this point.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 32 points 2 years ago (1 child)
  • [–] 28 points 2 years ago (1 child)
  • [–] 77 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Maybe he pulled it back to proofread for spelling, grammar and clarity

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 43 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Or to fact check it. He doesn't seem like the type to jump the gun

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 41 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Ladies and gentlemen, let me tell you something. Tremendous things, really. So, I tweeted something, and people are saying, “Donald, what’s going on with that tweet?” And I said, “Look, folks, it was a tremendous tweet, the best tweet, believe me.” But then, I thought, maybe it was too tremendous. Maybe it was too powerful. So, I deleted it. And people are saying, “Wow, that’s leadership.” And they’re right. Because I’m a leader, and leaders lead.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 77 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    The former president seemingly remembered that violating his gag order by commenting on witnesses could land him in jail

    Oh, he remembered. He just thinks he's playing 4D chess by tweeting then deleting because "it doesn't count."

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 44 points 2 years ago

    Bet he didnt delete it

  • source
  • [–] 35 points 2 years ago
    [–] 23 points 2 years ago

    Dumbfuck has never heard the term 'surprise witness.' And this one wasn't even a surprise. Of course she testified.

  • source
  • [–] 16 points 2 years ago

    Now he’s threatening me with JAIL, & THEY HAVE NO CASE

    I thought this shithead was ready to go to jail for speaking his mind committing multiple contempts of court. I guess that's not the case when it's not him talking.

    Merchan ruled as court began that Daniels can testify about her alleged sexual encounter with Trump and “how she felt about it,” but that he didn’t want to hear any of the nitty-gritty regarding the alleged affair with Daniels. We don’t need to know the details of intercourse,” Merchan said. Prosecutors assured the court that Daniels would not be describing “genitalia” in her testimony, ensuring the jury would not be subjected to another mushroom-comparison session.

    Anyone else notice the closing parentheses but no opening paren? Again, I'm sick of not having proper copy-editors in journalism!

    Look, I'm just gonna say what no one else is brave enough to say: he's awesome, let's elect him again, it's ok when he breaks the law. Fucking pig.

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 2 years ago* (2 children)

    He deleted it therefor not contempt of court.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    load more comments
    view more: next ›