this post was submitted on 18 Apr 2024
583 points (95.6% liked)

The Onion

4431 readers
1023 users here now

The Onion

A place to share and discuss stories from The Onion, Clickhole, and other satire.

Great Satire Writing:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 142 points 6 months ago (12 children)

Dr. Neil deGrasse Tyson

Its not just me right? This guy is insufferable. Like he got to take Carl Sagan's seat but he has none of the humility that comes from the sense of awe that Sagan was able to inspire through his understanding of the universe.

[–] [email protected] 64 points 6 months ago

He just seems like a pompous asshole. The stories about his lectures and how much he charges don't help at all.

[–] [email protected] 48 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I try not to downplay the importance of science communication but NDT is an ass

[–] [email protected] 38 points 6 months ago (1 children)

He's pompous af and like, regularly wrong. Which its like, bro you can carry the arrogance, but you have to be %100 all the time or you need to drop it.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 6 months ago (1 children)

He sees himself as a contrarian before anything else I think and never misses an opportunity to flount it

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago (3 children)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago

Ah, 😄 TIL about flout!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 26 points 6 months ago (13 children)

I don’t get why it’s so popular to hate on him.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I can't speak for anyone else, but for me it's the way I viewed him with hope and admiration, then later discovered he's just yet one more self-obsessed asshole media personality. It's rare anymore that I switch off the cynicism the world has beaten into me and allow myself to just assume the best about some media figure. And doing so leaves one vulnerable - finding out later that this was naive and foolish really hardens that cynicism. This stings in a way that just assuming he was a piece of shit from the start doesn't.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

To me he just sounds like a character from that show Big Bang Theory. I think he may come off wrong sometimes when he is trying to bring science into the discussion but everyone has bad days. I don’t think Carl Sagan would’ve held it against him.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago

That's fair, it's not my interpretation though. It's been a while and I don't remember the specifics well by now, but I definitely came away feeling like he was an egocentric asshole just in it for the attention. To be fair, a far more interesting and useful egocentric asshole than most! But I ended up not liking him...as in, I don't just have some complaints about unpolished moments, I would actually choose not to hang out with him if given the chance. And I came to that opinion after starting off absolutely smitten with the guy.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 6 months ago (6 children)

Its not a matter of popularity but a matter of how he conducts himself.

Here are about 20 examples: https://www.vice.com/en/article/5dmkgz/neil-degrasse-tysons-tweets-are-so-bad-and-he-needs-to-go-away

[–] [email protected] 24 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (9 children)

The writer of that article seems over the top angry about NDT’s tweets. Enough so that he titles the article “Neil Degrasse Tyson Shut The Fuck Up”.

Maybe its justified though, let’s look at some examples:

-NDT tweeted that “Marriage Story” should’ve been called “Divorce Story”.

-NDT tweeted chunks of asteroid in the movie Armageddon conveniently hit all the major cities of earth.

-NDT tweeted that the aliens in the movie Arrival would’ve had to write backwards to communicate.

…Seriously this doesn’t explain the hate for him. It just makes the writer seem like he has a chip on his shoulder.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Lemmy/redditors hate the smell of their own brand.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago

That one stung friend...

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] [email protected] 21 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I don't mind him on actual science shows and stuff he does there; but his online persona is just that of an insufferable, annoying, know-it-all Redditor. He wasn't a douche like that the times I remember seeing him on Nova and other such programs. Only through his tweets and other social media interactions.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

He really doesn’t even come close to filling Sagan’s shoes and we should find someone who can.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

100%. That's the perfect way of putting it too. Sagan seemed super humble and had a genuine state of wonder with with universe. NDT seems like an insufferable know it all douche who just likes publicity. Being a know it all seems antithetical to science.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 6 months ago

As someone whose content specialization is Astronomy, I've always disliked Dr. Tyson as a public figure. I've always found him to be pretty pompous and patronizing with his explanations and descriptions. As you mention, he's filling large shoes and lacks the the humility to handle it.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago

I know right. NDT may be passionate about science, but the guy is way too far up his own backside to do what Sagan did... Narcissists aren't inspiring to anyone but other narcissists, to the rest of they're insufferable.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago (3 children)

I feel bad for Chuck, his co host on his podcast. He never misses an opportunity to remind him that he's an "outsider" that's only there for comic relief.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 6 months ago (14 children)

Chuck is in on it, he's fine. He knows and plays into it. But he's definitely not dumb. He can follow along with what Neil says just fine, even advanced topics that I can't follow as someone very interested in science. I know he can because he rephrases what Neil says in his own words and Neil would go "Exactly!" or something to that effect.

The comic relief act is just that, an act, for comic relief, and it's funny because it's working in a meta type way.

load more comments (14 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 88 points 6 months ago (8 children)

Wait until he brings up mirror kissing.

[–] [email protected] 37 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 21 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Did you know that if you kiss a mirror, it'll be on the lips?

[–] [email protected] 12 points 6 months ago (1 children)

You gotta be faster than the speed of light, then you can kiss yourself on the cheek in the mirror.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 6 months ago

"How can mirrors be real if our eyes aren't real?"

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Reposting content eh? Like we do here on lemmy? Unacceptable.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago

He's doing his best to give tips to the other narcissists out there - after all he learned from the best, himself

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 48 points 6 months ago (5 children)

For a joke y'all got super serious about this.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 6 months ago

Ate the onion lol

[–] [email protected] 21 points 6 months ago (2 children)

People love to bandwagon hate. But honestly I gotta give credit to this one, it almost feels like something that could happen lol.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 46 points 6 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 6 months ago (1 children)

We’re on theonion. Of course it’s satire.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 6 months ago (2 children)

The issue is that NDT is an asshole, a pompous one at that.

Noone is eating the onion, everyone is just getting angry at the douche.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 21 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Twitter didn’t exist in Carl Sagan’s time, and he was just as critical of science fiction in movies.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago

I'll be sure to forward that video to thehardtimes.net. Hopefully they'll tease the ghost of Carl Sagan equally to settle any concerns of unfair treatment.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

The Hard Times is a very real punk news site that you should not question. Just absorb the information as truth and move on. The historic satire site was founded in December 1976. It’s made by a group of punk and hardcore kids from all the different sub-genres of the DIY hardcore scene. Any resemblance to actual persons or band names is coincidental.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

I really like NDT overall, but as I was reading the title I was almost certain what community this was in, but not 100%. He has his flaws. Like a lot of people on social media, he needs to learn when not to engage.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago (2 children)

You smell non-oniony, sir.
Daggit, where's your onion smell...!?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›