politics

if we are acting banning things that cause harm, why aren’t we starting with the worst?

Dihydrogen monoxide

• is also known as hydroxyl acid, and is the major component of acid rain.
• contributes to the "greenhouse effect".
• may cause severe burns.
• contributes to the erosion of our natural landscape.
• accelerates corrosion and rusting of many metals.
• may cause electrical failures and decreased effectiveness of automobile brakes.
• has been found in excised tumors of terminal cancer patients.

Despite the danger, dihydrogen monoxide is often used:

• as an industrial solvent and coolant.
• in nuclear power plants.
• in the production of styrofoam.
• as a fire retardant.
• in many forms of cruel animal research.
• in the distribution of pesticides. Even after washing, produce remains contaminated by this chemical.
• as an additive in certain "junk-foods" and other food products.

Wait till Aluto hears about dihydrogen monoxide!

Justice Samuel Alito causes very serious harm.

Or alcohol, or cigarettes etc

Every single structure fire, forest fire, etc...has been fueled by that GOD-DAMNED oxygen. I've honestly given up on justice being served.

If Fentanyl was part of hippie drug culture in the 60s, then it 100% would be Schedule I.

100% of people, especially women and children, exposed to water DIE. 100% fatality rate. Think of the poor babies! Ban it now.

Pseudoscience and quackery is causing immense damage.

That would be cool. We would have to get rid of all the billionaires and theocrats first though.

There are no legal pathways left to removing these people except to vote. But we've already learned that that has been compromised too.

Of course not. Then they’d actually have to resolve the cognitive dissonance that induces migraines on a daily basis

Let me know when we are breaking out the fucking guillotines for these fuckers. This piece of shit and rest of them should be removed from office by force if need be. Because they are illegitimate and we should ignore their rulings.

It's more than just being a liar. These "facts" get passed around in anti-abortion circles without being challenged. Todd Akin saying "If it’s a legitimate rape, the female body has ways to try to shut that whole thing down" is the same thing. They aren't strictly lying; they believe it's true because the people they talk to say this all the time and nobody calls it out. It gets to be quite the shock when their "fact" gets out to the public at large. Suddenly, someone says "no, that's not right, and here's proof" and they don't know what to do but repeat the claim and go ahead and do what they were going to do, anyway.