Pretty much. It can be coopted because fascists love extrrninationist ideologies, but it's closer to a world where a Venus flytrap or other predator that uses guile to entrap prey evolved beyond humans. I haven't seen anything in the lore to suggest otherwise. They aren't ontologically evil they are literally "evil" like a tiger in the jungle.
alternatively, :scully: (since we don't have one), :x-files: or :internet-research:
Keywords prob xfiles, scully, glasses, aliens
From Season 2 Episode 4, Sleepless.
There's some great shots of her with her CRT glow reflected (including some with text).
Should I get a less shit quality (taken with my phone here) cap for an emoji? Maybe :scully-posting: ? We should probably get a Mulder too if so, any candidates?
Folks, she's doing direct action against the tree that hurt the love monster. Truly a beacon of love in this hateful world.
There's also a great unplugged mix from the Hansa Sessions if you're into that kind of thing. Enjoy the bop.
Pretty sure any number of Nazis is entirely defensible.
Lenin forgot to mention that adventurism is cool because it makes all the liberals show their ass with hand wringing.
Adventurists, I apologize, you were right.
Seriously though, hexbears, still don't start doing adventurism. ORGANIZE AND AGITATE. A mass movement is the only way things will change.
feels cool, but we need to see this moment and energy from a broader perspective. If this just ends with everyone being "that was cool" it's not enough. Instead, as the debt collective noted, medical debtors (and others harmed by this evil system) need to organize.
After all, eventually CEOs will just hire tons of goons and private security. So as cool as this was it's not sustainable and violence is only effective coupled to a movement. I'm thinking of my 
here - when he discussed violence it was always as part of a larger mass movement, not simply wielded by random adventurers.
Of course this doesn't mean we can't seize this moment and this shock to begin to organize and deploy real power. I need to reread all of Lenin on the adventurism, but does he ever talk about being opportunistic about this stuff?
if you do adventurism we disavow
but if you do
don't
but IF you do.....
we disavow and you're not a real poster on hexbear, just a lurker.
so don't do it. But if you do....
we disavow
All irony and jokes aside, I think a bit of fear is entirely justified and organizing is more important than ever.
I wish the general strike wasn't 2028.
Hahaha blahaj sucks so hard.
I remember when we defederated them first because of the ableist apologia they did.
PS I love all our trans comrades 
BEING A MINORITY DOESN'T MAKE YOU A DECENT PERSON OR MAKE YOU MAGICALLY UNDERSTAND SOCIAL JUSTICE. LOG OFF AND READ A BOOK!
More neurodivergent queer CIA ghouls does not a liberated society make.
The best part is that I know for sure a few blahaj members have opened accounts here.
That's a 
from me.
Also, I have a family member with an intellectual disability, so it sticks in my craw when someone tries to defend it as innocent. It's fine if someone throws it out and then gets corrected (think of the Chapos, they quit using it after all), since for a long time it was "acceptable." But to try and defend yourself after correction.... 
Awoo has already noted some important refutations, but I want to unpack something here.
Landlords and Bourgeoisie are class identities. Importantly, these are not the result of things outside of your control (i.e. ethnic origin, nation, etc.) but instead determined by actions in the world. While one can't say that one is subhuman because of where they are from, isn't being a landlord (and thus extracting rent from people for shelter) a behavior? A series of actions and choices? And can't we characterize a behavior or action as evil/immoral? Basically, when I say "landlords are evil and deserve to die or surrender their assets to the collective" what I'm describing is a particular set of actions. It's not different from having an opinion on if murderers deserve capital punishment.
Btw, I believe in rehabilitative punishment. However, if we're going to talk about people who deserve to die, I think capitalists and landlords are up there. A person who kills someone else -- either due to mental illness or a crime of passion -- is far less damaging to our social fabric than people who, through institutions, contribute to the death of our world and the immiseration of many. For instance, how many unhoused people have gone hungry/died because of the executives at Starbucks who decide that food thrown out should be covered in coffee grounds to be inedible? We don't have the numbers, but shouldn't we call this behavior subhuman/evil? I think you're missing the distinction between saying the executive who designed that policy deserves the gulag -- a specific inhuman action that deserves a specific response -- and calling all insert ethnicity/nationality here subhuman.
Yeah it's like adopting a fucking chimp (not even a true predator that) and being surprised it killed you. Or grizzly man. I think it basically supports the thesis.