[-] javiwhite@feddit.uk 1 points 4 days ago

The final part of your comment has me questioning the possibility of female incel snakes.

[-] javiwhite@feddit.uk 3 points 4 days ago

A double ended dongle, you could say?

[-] javiwhite@feddit.uk 21 points 4 days ago

We cant get near that title, American police are significantly more fucked up.

There were 95 deaths directly caused by police in January 2026 alone in the US. There has been 1 in the UK this year so far, 2 if we state this as directly caused by police due to ineptitude.

In an ideal world we wouldn't have these incompetent fucks running society for the Epstein class, but I'd still take incompetent over bloodthirsty any day of the week.

[-] javiwhite@feddit.uk 72 points 4 months ago

I know I do; because I refuse to use windows.  

Badum tss. (Yes, I use arch btw.)

19
submitted 8 months ago by javiwhite@feddit.uk to c/uk_politics@feddit.uk

Following on from my previous post regarding the registration email received by 'your Party' subscribed emails, it seems as though the membership sign up site was created by Zarah Sultana independently of the rest of the party. This has been corroborated by a statement released by Zarah on both the YourParty-membership site and X. Stating that the reason for doing so was being pushed out of decision making and an apparent "boys club" methodology to the current decision making.

All of this controversy is very fresh, so it's difficult to get a clear picture, but it seems like today's membership portal was setup as a means to wrestle leverage in ongoing debates between supposed custodians of the founding process. I'm retaining my membership there out of morbid curiosity on what happens to the money etc, but I can't advise others to do the same in good conscience. All in all a dark day for a party that's yet to lay down its founding documents let alone name. Apologies to any who have been misled by my previous post.

66
submitted 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) by javiwhite@feddit.uk to c/uk_politics@feddit.uk

Following on from the recent controversy, I've created a follow up post regarding the fallout between Zarah and Jeremys respective sides of Your Party. All in all a very disappointing start to what was intended to be a joyous occasion;

https://feddit.uk/post/36527176.

I'm not going to remove any of the below, as I'm not a fan of whitewashing events, nor am I seeking a refund on the money paid into the membership, as quite frankly I'm curious as to what happens next. We may not get a truly democratic party out of this, but at least I've got a front row seat for the fireworks. Sigh

~~Membership has opened for Your Party, with two tiers available; regular and concessionary.~~

~~There isn't much information around the difference between standard and concessionary membership other than the difference in price, and whether all tiers will be eligible for votes or not, so I'm enlisting the aid of my partner who will follow the path of concessionary, whilst I do the same with standard.~~

~~I feel it's right to mention that some people have raised concerns around the legitimacy of the statements that this is a truly democratic 1 person 1 vote as alluded to and not another autocratic party in nature. So I will look to provide an overview of the process from now until the end of the current roadmap highlighted in my previous post.~~

~~As for the membership fees themselves. The regular tier is set at £5 per month, or £55 per year. Whereas the concessionary is exactly half, set to £2.50 per month, or £25 per year. There seems to be no restrictions on who can sign up as concessionary or standard.~~.

Membership link removed due to subsequent updates (full update here).

I should point out that I'm not a journalist, or political expert in any sense. I'm just your run of the mill middle aged British socialist with arguably too much time on his hands. Prior to paying the initial membership fee, I wasn't affiliated with the party in any regard, nor is any of this paid advertising.

Finally, if you see this flamingo's, I'm sorry about the egregious spacing after the first line; it's their API, not me! :p .

79
submitted 8 months ago by javiwhite@feddit.uk to c/uk_politics@feddit.uk
[-] javiwhite@feddit.uk 94 points 9 months ago

" ...some men aren't looking for anything logical, like money. They can't be bought, bullied, reasoned, or negotiated with. Some men just want to watch the wood burn "

[-] javiwhite@feddit.uk 90 points 10 months ago

Harry shotter and the chamber of bullets.

[-] javiwhite@feddit.uk 81 points 10 months ago

Here is the sacred tome you refer too m'lord wiggle;

Seriously though, is this the one you were thinking of?

I'm fairly sure this is the original I saw; But searching for "woman, soldering iron" results in many copycats, so it's hard to say if this is actually the one from back when, or if my mind just misremembers it as such.

223
Meet Bronson (feddit.uk)
submitted 10 months ago by javiwhite@feddit.uk to c/cat@lemmy.world

He was a stray kitten that I adopted, and was a very feisty kitten; always fighting with my fully grown cat, and even picking on the dog, he is scared of nothing, and an amazing escape artist to boot (I just count myself lucky he liked us enough to keep coming back).

He's currently the (less than) proud owner of a cone of shame, and locked away in my bedroom. Living up to his namesake he still loves a good ol' scrap with the local cats and foxes.

One such event didn't pay off for him however, as we ended up down the vets because he got an abscess on his cheek. Turns out part of a claw was still embedded in him, which would have likely caused reinfections/worsening conditions had it not been treated.

It's been around a week of recovery now, and he's due to be free again this Saturday; so I apologise to the local cat and fox populations in advance.

88
Wisdom to live life by (thelemmy.club)
[-] javiwhite@feddit.uk 77 points 11 months ago

Religion has historically provided a safe haven to the sick and twisted among society, where they're allowed to act with impunity due to their perceived status.

That's not directly due to the religion; but rather due to the societal pedestal being devout seems to put people on; "a holy person could never do that to a child" etc...

The reality is, other areas that benefit from this sort of status too find themselves riddled with bad actors... Just look through charity organisations and I can guarantee you'll be combing over a sea of sociopaths buying themselves good credit with public opinion rather than people looking to make a difference because they want to (not to say these people don't exist; they just don't end up running the show normally)

[-] javiwhite@feddit.uk 88 points 11 months ago

Bee the change you want to see.

[-] javiwhite@feddit.uk 63 points 1 year ago

Something tells me we can trust this user on their knowledge of ice and its limits.

[-] javiwhite@feddit.uk 67 points 1 year ago

In the UK these are called doughnuts.

The presence of a hole isnt a pre-requisite to being deemed a doughnut here.

Calling something that has zero holes a 'donut hole', will absolutely have a local refer to you as a doughnut tho...

view more: next ›

javiwhite

0 post score
0 comment score
joined 1 year ago