89
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 38 points 1 year ago

Second movie is much better about it, though they still refuse to use "jihad" as a term probably for burger reasons (it would send 80-90% of an american audience into a berserk state)

[-] [email protected] 34 points 1 year ago

though they still refuse to use "jihad"

The Butlerian Kerfuffle.

[-] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago

The Butlerian Struggle Session...

[-] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago

The Outdoorian Cat Crusade

[-] [email protected] 28 points 1 year ago

To be fair they don’t refrain from calling it a religious war. Though using the term “holy war” instead of jihad is most definitely to dumb it down for Americans who don’t know “jihad” is not just a term for islamic terrorism

[-] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

For sure - the message is the same and the plot isn't harmed in any measurable way, just a kinda pointless/funny concession to the American audience

[-] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I mean, they also changed the "Long live the fighters" from the books where it is "Ya Hya Chouhada!".

this post was submitted on 13 Mar 2024
89 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13894 readers
689 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS