167
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Nothing by Brian is canon, you might as well tell me about something you dreamed

[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

It is canon by definition, but the difference in content means there are three separate canons: Just Frank, Frank + Encyclopedia, Frank + Brian.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

False, someone spill the water of this non believer!

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The water of life, so i awaken and declare Brianian Jihad on all gatekeepers!

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

for real though, ugh, brian is such a bad writer...

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I doubt he is writer at all, KJA is really prolific writer that does it all, and KJA is not THAT bad, only two of Extended Dune books i would scrap as "awful" and none because of writing.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Are you talking about books 7 and 8?

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

No, Paul of Dune and Winds of Dune. Winds are truly horrible in content, though do plug some blind spots in lore, while Paul is meh, but i absolutely abhor the "young insert hero name adventures" prequel genre and it is exactly that.

Btw even Brian and KJA apparently agrees since Paul and Winds were two books of planned trilogy, but after not stellar reviews third book was put on revision for years.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

If those are that much worse than 7 and 8 I can hardly imagine

this post was submitted on 04 Mar 2024
167 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13894 readers
783 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS