128
submitted 2 years ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

jesus-christ

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 47 points 2 years ago

The problem isn't the book inherently, but the inevitable reception when put in the hands of pedophilic cultures like those of the anglosphere. Nabakov was adamant, for example, that the cover should not depict Lolita (the character) in any literal sense (or any person, iirc), for obvious and correct reasons. You can look up what cover art has nonetheless been used if you are feeling masochistic.

[-] [email protected] 30 points 2 years ago

I blame Kubrick. He brought in the heart shaped sunglasses.

this post was submitted on 13 Jan 2024
128 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13956 readers
751 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS