36

It's not that I don't get the appeal of having larger artwork. But the medium itself in the way it's used and produced doesn't make sense. The whole audio production pipeline is digital. Producers take analogue audio, introduce quantisation and digitisation errors immediately to be able to use their fancy computers to produce the music (which introduces even more errors due to all filters being digital) just to then dump that digital piece of sound into an analogue medium at the very end. Nothing is gained except the digital-analogue-conversion happens before creating the medium whereas with CDs you do it after reading from that medium. Which is a stupid idea, as dust and other issues will then mess with the result you're hearing.

Now, if you're a producer that actually uses an all-analogue workflow, ignore this, I don't mean you. You also have my deepest respect for enduring that pain. Please point me towards some records that actually did this though.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] lime@feddit.nu 14 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

any extant quantisation error is mathematically corrected for utterly and completely thanks to the sampling theorem. 44.1kHz is theoretically enough to reconstruct a 20kHz waveform exactly, and we typically oversample by a factor of 5. of course you could use a shitty ADC to get the data in but with a normal 24-bit one you get 16 million possible positions of a waveform in one time slice. considering that the average JND in humans is around 1dB, giving you roughly 140 000 imperceptible steps between every perceptible one from "vacuum of space" to "head inside a jet engine", this is a pretty big margin.

as for digital filtering, it works on a mathematically perfect version of the waveform rather than one distorted further for every step. it's like being able to filter in parallel rather than in series, meaning the integrity of the wave is preserved until tapeout.

of course you can do analog filtering, both before and after. the noise and artifacts it introduces can make music a lot more dynamic and interesting. but the idea that digital workflows are somehow worse is completely false. if they were, the biggest producers in the world would have stopped using digital filters as soon as they were introduced in the late 70's.

all that said, i completely agree that vinyl doesn't make sense. who would want their music on a format that degrades with every use and is unable to represent the full range of volume humans can perceive?

Edit: flubbed a unit

[-] naeap@sopuli.xyz 2 points 12 hours ago

I usually listen to stuff digitally encoded on some capable device

But there is just something with putting on a vinyl and listening to the whole album
I could do the same with digital media, but it just feels different

It's not really about the music quality, it's just about the experience

You don't need to like it, but some people do and that's ok as well

I like some 80s punk (Ton Steine Scherben) and I got their whole work gifted in vinyl.
Usually I just listen to mp3/ogg of them, but from time to time, I like to spin up a vinyl and just let it run and listen
It's...well, it's a different experience

[-] lime@feddit.nu 3 points 11 hours ago

oh no i also like it! it's the entire purposeful ritualistic thing that makes it good. i did that a lot when i was younger. and that's why vinyl still makes sense for the experience. but the op was all about the quality, and there's nothing special about the quality of vinyl other than nostalgia.

[-] naeap@sopuli.xyz 1 points 10 hours ago

Yeah, true that

this post was submitted on 17 Jul 2026
36 points (80.0% liked)

Unpopular Opinion

9247 readers
432 users here now

Welcome to the Unpopular Opinion community!


How voting works:

Vote the opposite of the norm.


If you agree that the opinion is unpopular give it an arrow up. If it's something that's widely accepted, give it an arrow down.



Guidelines:

Tag your post, if possible (not required)


  • If your post is a "General" unpopular opinion, start the subject with [GENERAL].
  • If it is a Lemmy-specific unpopular opinion, start it with [LEMMY].


Rules:

1. NO POLITICS


Politics is everywhere. Let's make this about [general] and [lemmy] - specific topics, and keep politics out of it.


2. Be civil.


Disagreements happen, but that doesn’t provide the right to personally attack others. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Please also refrain from gatekeeping others' opinions.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Shitposts and memes are allowed but...


Only until they prove to be a problem. They can and will be removed at moderator discretion.


5. No trolling.


This shouldn't need an explanation. If your post or comment is made just to get a rise with no real value, it will be removed. You do this too often, you will get a vacation to touch grass, away from this community for 1 or more days. Repeat offenses will result in a perma-ban.


6. Defend your opinion


This is a bit of a mix of rules 4 and 5 to help foster higher quality posts. You are expected to defend your unpopular opinion in the post body. We don't expect a whole manifesto (please, no manifestos), but you should at least provide some details as to why you hold the position you do.



Instance-wide rules always apply. https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS