you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 15 points 2 months ago (3 children)

he might be a bit delusional

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 29 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    No, there's some justification for his attitude. id genuinely has been a massive influence on the industry on the technology side of things. The first Doom engine was revolutionary. John Carmack straight-up invented new math for shadow calculation in id Tech 3. Microsoft made a really stupid decision here.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    Carmack seems to be a libertarian creep, but he was committed to open sourcing each version of the engine. That ended when MS got involved.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 child)

    It's hardly the same id Software anymore, Carmack left over a decade ago. Everything they've done in the last 20 years has ranged from ”meh” to ”decent I guess”. Nobody uses idTech anymore.

    Imagine bragging about working on Rage, lmao.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    Yeah but he is writing about the reboots. What has that got to do with developments from the last millennium. The mythos around idsoftware is the main reason these games sold.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    Doom Eternal et. al are also just good games

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    I don't know anyone who care about the doom reboots.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    They’re fine. They’re not especially revolutionary, in fact quite the opposite since they lean so heavily on nostalgia for much of what they are.

    It is useful to have another 3D engine alternative to Unreal, but having Microsoft in ultimate control of that meant that it was never especially dependable for anyone.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    The newer engines after Quake3 weren't super relevant.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    I feel it's worth noting that up until COD:Ghosts, the entire COD series was built on top of the q3a engine

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 2 months ago* (1 child)

    Doom 2016 and Doom Eternal: Yes

    Doom the Dark Ages: ehhhhhhhh

    Still a god tier engine though, one of many in a long line of god tier engines from Id

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 months ago* (1 child)

    I don't know anything about engines, but looking at it all the proprietary idtech engines have been basically only used for Doom and Wolfenstein and like that one Indians jones game

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago*

    yeah it is hard to say if it's actually good without seeing other companies efforts but that's one of the problems with it being a proprietary engine isn't it other people aren't going to put effort into using it but I remember it ran really well on my old ass PC at the time despite looking so good which is the primary thing I'm judging it by like in my opinion the best engine is still probably the fox engine for the reason of quality to requirements

  • source
  • parent