96

much of the busy agenda was taken up by proposed climate rollbacks, including the replacement of the 2035 combustion-engine phase-out with weaker CO2 standards for new cars and weakening its carbon-pricing system for industries and power production.

Europe’s own electrification path has been slow compared to some other large economies, rising only about five percent since 1990. During this time, China went from six percent to almost 30 percent

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] plyth@feddit.org 34 points 1 day ago

climate policy rollbacks during historic heatwave

How much more do we want to be taken for fools? How do we get responsible politicians?

[-] oyzmo@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago

Main one: Prohibit lobbying (or soft corruption as I.like to call it). Others: Set payment + 100% illegal to receive gifts, services for free, any type of advantage + extreme high fine for both parties if they are caught breaking the rules.

[-] GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I would also include aggressive financial oversight, constant supervision of all financials, assets and so forth. Possibly even mandatory external management for the duration of their term.

Officials and their families should not be able to privately invest at all while they are holding office. Seems inconvenient for them, but anyone going into politics hoping to do some insider trading should get the fuck out anyway.

[-] BigShammy80@feddit.org 3 points 1 day ago

All good points... but it will never happen... Money can buy everyone, every decision maker in the line can be bought and influenced.

You need some rules like: If you're caught accepting money of any kind except your salary, you go in jail for 1 year or something. Without exception or early release.

With that some probably would think twice before going corrupt.

[-] Hapankaali@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Maybe it's worth considering that "prohibiting" lobbying would also ban or severely restrict many NGOs such as Amnesty International and Greenpeace, trade unions, the recent initiative to "Stop Killing Games" as has been discussed on this instance extensively, etc.

Obviously politicians should be banned from accepting cocaine, hookers, chests of golden doubloons, etc. from other parties, but it can still be useful for them to consider the perspective of different groups in society, including environmental groups, citizen initiatives, but also industry advocates.

[-] plyth@feddit.org 0 points 1 day ago

How do you enforce this? How do you enact this?

[-] Ooops@feddit.org 3 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

How do we get responsible politicians?

Easy: Pay them as much as the industry they are actually working for. Oh, you don't have enough money for that? Well, it's your problem (and entirely your fault) that you are too poor to matter.

On a more serious note: People seem to believe that voting more and more for screaching morons promising burn the planet faster while at the same time rolling back every positive development of decades is the way to go. So the actual answer is you won't. Because in a democracy the majority is calling the shots and sadly that majority is criminally stupid.

[-] huppakee@lemmy.world 2 points 22 hours ago

Easy: Pay them as much as the industry

Gathering those kinds of funds as simple peasants is not easy at all :(

Because in a democracy the majority is calling the shots.

I'm confused, you just said those with money call the shots. Is it because the politicians aren't the only ones receiving big bags of money? We the peasants not only need responsible politicians but also responsible (and well-funded) media outlets.

[-] plyth@feddit.org 1 points 22 hours ago

in a democracy the majority is calling the shots and sadly that majority is criminally stupid

What can be done about the stupidity?

[-] Ooops@feddit.org 2 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

Now? Not much.

The actual main measures so voters don't fall for stupid bullshit against their interests (education and proper journalism) already failed. In big parts because the propagandists prepared well by buying out a lot of media and defunding education.

[-] DdCno1@beehaw.org 2 points 19 hours ago

Better education, more measures against fake news and propaganda. Some nations (like, as per usual, the Nordics) are working hard on this, including even with providing courses for adults on how to spot fake news (as well as incorporating it into the general curriculum), but most are complacent at best, far too slow at adapting to rapidly changing times.

[-] notsosure@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago

People are increasingly voting rightwing parties, and this is the price they pay.

[-] Goldholz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 day ago

They dont pay it because it is mostly old people voting right wing

[-] reksas@sopuli.xyz 6 points 1 day ago

first they pulled the ladder with them, now they are pouring gasoline and throwing matches. may they rot in hell

[-] birdwing@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

And old people think, right wing parties protect our pensions

(While they kick the pensions even lower and blame insert any group with little power for their own greed)

It is not old people that are our enemy. The only enemy we have is but the reactionary elite who manipulates the labourers!

[-] SapphireSphinx@feddit.org 3 points 1 day ago

That's only half the truth. At least in my country.

While it is true that many Boomers vote conservative, e. g. Millenials like to vote far right instead. In total there is not that much difference between generations (Gen-Z excluded but this will change as soon as they have themselfs established and have something to loose).

this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2026
96 points (100.0% liked)

Europe

11434 readers
825 users here now

News and information from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in other communities.
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
  10. Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.

(This list may get expanded as necessary.)

Posts that link to the following sources will be removed

Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media (incl. Substack). Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com

(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)

Ban lengths, etc.

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the admin that applied the rule (check modlog first to find who was it.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS