80
submitted 3 days ago by Saymaz@lemmygrad.ml to c/slop@hexbear.net
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Esoteir@hexbear.net 95 points 2 days ago

i feel like i'm healing, i finally don't understand a slop post

[-] Awoo@hexbear.net 77 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

The acp types really really really hate lady izdihar for being a progressive muslim and for just being a woman in general. They've been targeting her a lot lately. Also they just kinda really hate anything fun tbh, they behave like Tate in terms of despising anything remotely fun.

[-] AssortedBiscuits@hexbear.net 34 points 2 days ago

I don't even get their gripe from this particular screenshot. She's dressed rather modestly, so they can't cry about that. They just don't like how she has white makeup?

[-] Moss@hexbear.net 28 points 2 days ago

She is openly gay and enjoys expressing herself, that's more than enough for misogynists to lose their minds

[-] Saymaz@lemmygrad.ml 16 points 2 days ago
[-] PunkMonk@lemmygrad.ml 20 points 2 days ago
[-] MLRL_Commie@hexbear.net 14 points 2 days ago

I've never seen gay used as a catch-all term to include bisexuality before, but i think that's what you're doing? Is that a normal thing to do with the word gay? I thought 'queer' more common to refer to such a case. Unless she describes herself as gay, I guess, though I would still be interested in why that specific term?

[-] Keld@hexbear.net 11 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

The internet does it sometimes. I've seen "Gay" used to describe straight trans people (Which felt transphobic to me, but it was a trans person doing it so what the fuck do I know) and nonbinary people in general.

[-] Awoo@hexbear.net 8 points 2 days ago

The thing about being straight trans is that no matter what you society determines that what you're doing is non-conforming on both sexuality and gender. They might be "straight" but society considers it gay. In a sense it's both a reclamation of words, a statement of pride in who you are, and also an elimination of the power of the word to be used negatively against you.

Another factor is probably that at some point the straight trans person has been with gay non-trans people, and in some cases they were gay non-trans before they realised they were ever trans. So then it all just becomes a mess of semantics and they generally don't care about the terms other than being acknowledged as the gender they identify as.

In a way "gay" becomes a catchall for all things non-conforming when used this way.

[-] MLRL_Commie@hexbear.net 5 points 2 days ago

Very interesting phenomenon. Pretty dialectical, that is. Cool, and good to know!

[-] TheoryofChange@hexbear.net 7 points 2 days ago

In the irl queer spaces I'm in, gay and queer are used pretty much interchangeably. This is a specific irl space though, so ymmv, I don't know of it's a regionalism or what

[-] Moss@hexbear.net 3 points 2 days ago

To be clear I did not know she apparently has a husband, for some reason I thought she was lesbian.

[-] Saymaz@lemmygrad.ml 8 points 2 days ago
[-] PunkMonk@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I'm no expert on this but my understanding is both are correct terms here, and the terms are not mutually exclusive. If you're bisexual you're gay because you're capable of being into the same sex and that qualifies you to identify as gay. If you're gay and attracted to the opposite sex aswell then you're bi of course.

As heterosexuality is the default or the norm, it means it works more as something you disqualify from for not being only into the opposite sex, so you can't be straight when you're bisexual. I guess it's like how half-back people can say theyre mixed or black but usually not white if theyre noticeably not strictly racially white to others.

Confusing identity stuff basically. And as the other replies stated gay can also mean anyone LGBTQ+ in some cases.

[-] Moss@hexbear.net 5 points 2 days ago

Apparently she does? For some reason I thought she was lesbian, I have no idea why I thought that but I just didn't question it

[-] Keld@hexbear.net 22 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

She's a clown, like a literal clown, and she's making "Communist balloon animals".

The total lack of rule 1 enforcement is the issue here.

[-] AssortedBiscuits@hexbear.net 6 points 2 days ago

That just sounds like a well-adjusted person who's most likely good with kids.

[-] chgxvjh@hexbear.net 7 points 2 days ago

Well nobody has commented link or lib yet

[-] chgxvjh@hexbear.net 26 points 2 days ago

Maybe it's the clown stuff and the fact that they hate fun.

this post was submitted on 25 May 2026
80 points (100.0% liked)

Slop.

857 readers
382 users here now

For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target federated instances' admins or moderators.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS