you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 17 points 4 months ago (18 children)

Normally you can use "delusions" instead of fanon

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 4 months ago

    I'm glad you learned a lesson here. We won't be removing your post so it can maybe serve an educational purpose to others in the future, too. Thank you for being willing to accept criticism.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 40 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    The problem with the term delusion is that implies "mental illness" as a dichotomic alternative to "just having fun".

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 4 months ago

    It’s mostly having fun, but there is a line that gets crossed into the pathological when fans get angry at the author/creator when they do something that contradicts something in the fanon. And I don’t mean just being disappointed, I mean full on “how dare they this is an offense to me” anger.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 37 points 4 months ago* (5 children)

    I disagree. Spoilers for everything::

    spoiler

    Sometimes fanon gets confirmed later, or just adopted because it is actually a quite nice take on the story.

    Like Vault Tec being the ones to drop the nukes, or the Xenomorphs being made intentionally as a weapon.

    Sometimes the fanon is basically canon but there's just not textual confirmation.

    Like Jon Snow being the son of Lyanna Stark

    But most of the time fanon either fulfills a need for the story to be better than it was, or it just refers to established conventions for fan fiction purposes.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 4 months ago (5 children)

    Don't be a DEckhead. The stories aren't real, the characters aren't real. They're subject to reimagining and reinterpretation.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    That was a good reading but

    They’re subject to reimagining and reinterpretation.

    That becomes a problem when for example the Korra fandom try to whitewash the nazi Kuvira to be something likeable. Okay the show itself try to do that but come on you should not agree with the bullshit the characters are saying(the authors are saying). The fandom can write an alternative universe that Kuvira is not a nazi piece of shit but why? Why the fixation on the nazi character?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 4 months ago

    Why the fixation on the nazi character?

    Because she was the only villain that was really humanised at all in the show, so people gravitate towards that. I think a better question would be "why did the writers of the show decide that the only villain who needed to be portrayed complexly and sympathetically was the Fascist?"

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 4 months ago*

    Why the fixation on the nazi character?

    Awesome Hitler effect where western writers make their villain Hitler but also really cool and stoic (also always conventionally attractive) Her death camps are reduced to passing dialogue and we never get a follow up on them (also the ideology behind her death camps is so contrived and incomprehensible as to basically provoke fanon).

    A lot of western action stories have a worrying amount of Awesome Hitlers.

  • source
  • parent