you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 30 points 4 months ago* (6 children)

The wood is soft and fibrous and the taste has been compared to chestnuts.

i would have guessed that "wood" is too strongly defined by all of its indigestible structural shit like lignin to the point that "wood" and "edible" are mutually exclusive, but apparently this one tree just happens to... not use lignin for some reason? pretty neat

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 4 months ago* (5 children)

    Yeah no cellulose at all basically makes the bark taste like a nutty semi sweet tofu

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    i'm mostly just surprised that it's still considered "wood" at that point instead of some other kind of plant part

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments