143

BUDAPEST, Hungary (AP) — The real threat facing Hungary is not Russia but the European Union, Prime Minister Viktor Orbán said in a speech to supporters on Saturday, as his nationalist party ramps up an anti-EU campaign ahead of national elections.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] comrade_twisty@feddit.org 64 points 1 day ago

Weird that EU is sending so much money to Hungary, quite weird for an enemy organization.

[-] Quittenbrot@feddit.org 44 points 1 day ago

Weird that EU is sending so much money to Hungary, quite weird for an enemy organization.

An enemy organisation he's free to leave at any time, also.

[-] nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 day ago

Why would he leave when he can use the mechanisms of the EU to fuck shit up on behalf of Russia.

[-] SharkAttak@kbin.melroy.org 3 points 1 day ago

Why not ease that process, and kick them out altogether? I'm sure they'll like the Russian Alternative.

[-] MousePotatoDoesStuff@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago

Because they're having elections this year.

But we should consider it if Orban stays in.

[-] CAVOK@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

There's no way to kick a member out of the EU.

[-] Goodeye8@piefed.social 2 points 4 hours ago

There's no way to kick a member out but a member can have their voting rights taken away and have their funds frozen. Hungary already had their funds frozen (which got unfrozen in 2023 but EU might demand those assets back, I made a different comment regarding that down below) and there is an ongoing article 7 process but it hasn't reached a point where voting rights would be taken away, mostly because it's very hard to get all the other EU countries to agree on it (for the longest time Poland made sure nothing would happen to Hungary and in return Hungary made sure nothing would happen to Poland).

[-] SharkAttak@kbin.melroy.org 3 points 14 hours ago
[-] luciferofastora@feddit.org 1 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

Not legally, since that change of statutes would require consent from all member states. Yeah, they kinda shot themselves in the foot by not preparing any response for rogue members.

[-] GenosseFlosse@feddit.org 3 points 1 day ago

Seems like this was a pretty big mistake nobody considered at the time...

[-] Quittenbrot@feddit.org 4 points 1 day ago

They were dreaming of a better future..

[-] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 day ago

They must have been following the UN Security Council's example...

[-] SrMono@feddit.org 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

a ) let us see how his elections turn out b ) EU is reshaping so minorities cannot block and extort said money any longer.

Looking ahead to a brighter future.

[-] Goodeye8@piefed.social 6 points 1 day ago

I had to check what you meant because I thought EU turned off the faucet. Well, this is where it gets interesting. Apparently the faucet was turned off as per EU laws and then in December 2023 the EU commission unfroze the funds which amounted to 10 billion euros. But then in April 2024 the EU parliament filed a suit that the commission had wrongly applied the rule of law when unfreezing the funds. A few days ago, prior to the summit, a top advisor of the EU court of Justice said that the EU commission should demand that 10 billion back.

Would be interesting to know if Orban was making his comments before or after hearing this.

[-] fierysparrow89@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

I'd guess blackmail. If not exactly voting yes but at least abstaining when UA support, RU sanctions were voted on. The current EU rules were not made for dealing with an actively sabotaging state in mind.

this post was submitted on 14 Feb 2026
143 points (99.3% liked)

Europe

10193 readers
1494 users here now

News and information from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in other communities.
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
  10. Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.

(This list may get expanded as necessary.)

Posts that link to the following sources will be removed

Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media (incl. Substack). Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com

(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)

Ban lengths, etc.

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the primary mod account @EuroMod@feddit.org

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS