1224
Welp (lemmy.dbzer0.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 107 points 10 months ago

The "he was fired for talking about Charlie Kirk" narrative is a lie.

He was talking mostly about the Epstein Files.

2 days ago
1 day ago

[-] aceshigh@lemmy.world 87 points 10 months ago

He was fired because that was the plan when Colbert was fired. They literally said he was next.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 24 points 10 months ago

Okay but why in that way - during the taping of a show? That doesn't seem very "planned". That seems like a desperate rush.

Over the weekend would have been smoother. Hell, just about any other way would have been smoother.

They gave Colbert another year.

[-] Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 61 points 10 months ago

Someone in the administration (not Trump obviously) is smart enough to know to strike while the iron is hot. Use the Charlie Kirk killing to justify all kinds of shit that they want to do anyway while they have an angry army of supporters to shout down anyone who dares to speak up against their actions.

They were always going to declare antifa a "terrorist organization." They were always going to come after Kimmel. They were always going to put democrats on lists to be investigated. The MAGA anger over Kirk's killing just gave them the opportunity to speed up the timeline and they couldn't let it go to waste.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 17 points 10 months ago

I still say it was about THE EPSTEIN FILES and not the nazi that the other nazi shot.

[-] Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 28 points 10 months ago

Partially yes. But I'm positive that they were looking for their own Reichstag fire and found it in the Kirk killing.

[-] Gerudo@lemmy.zip 38 points 10 months ago

Colbert getting canned was a test. They saw they could get away with it, so now gloves are off and off Kimmel goes in one night.

Everything they do is a test to see if they can get away with something. If they do, they ratchet up to the next horrendous idea.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

I don’t doubt they wanted to gauge reactions. I doubt ABC was part of that in any way.

[-] Gerudo@lemmy.zip 11 points 10 months ago

Whether they were or weren't, they didn't try to stand up and say no. That's all the information I need.

[-] Butterpaderp@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

ABC execs only care about money, same thing with every other corporation bending the knee

[-] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Sorry I can't gauge your sarcasm I just watched Anne Rice bullshit. So just in case:

When asked by Jonathan Karl at ABC News asks

What do you make of Pam Bondi saying she’s gonna go after hate speech? I mean, a lot of your allies say hate speech is free speech

Krasnov responds

[I] should probably go after people like you, because you treat me so unfairly. You have a lot of hate in your heart. Maybe they’ll come after ABC.

And a few days later an open loudmouthed and funny critic of Krasnov gets fired at ABC. No connection whatsoever.

this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2025
1224 points (98.3% liked)

Microblog Memes

11874 readers
807 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

RULES:

  1. Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
  2. Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
  3. You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
  4. Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
  5. Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If an image is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
  6. Absolutely no NSFL content.
  7. Be nice. Don't take anything personally. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements & arguments to private messages.
  8. No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.

RELATED COMMUNITIES:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS