65
submitted 3 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Been seeing more and more evidence that mass literacy is both massively diminished compared to the 20th century and accelerating in its decline across the world, especially in relatively highly educated countries. This problem is obviously much more severe amongst the working class than others, as historically tends to be the case.

If we want the masses to get to grips with a communist understanding of the world, which requires a lot of reading and discussion of text, surely this is an issue we need to grapple with. Current political education initiatives usually bring together smaller, highly-literate (typically university educated) groups of people, which tend to remain insular and rarely seem to engage with the broader working class. I am convinced that a significant barrier to mass political education is that so many "literate" people are unable to read a simple paragraph.

How do we rectify this situation? It seems historically unique because in the past, illiterate people had no illusions about the fact that they couldn't read and were enthusiastic about learning (at least, in general). Nowadays, I can imagine that most people would not view their literacy as something that needs to be improved, and many will even react with hostility to such a suggestion.

What's the correct approach? Do we need to emphasise the practical rewards that those who engage with theoretical texts benefit from? Take a direct approach and offer reading comprehension sessions? Interested to hear what others think.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 39 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Didn't we hold a Pedagogy of the Oppressed reading club a while back? Even if we did, maybe it's time we do one again.

Paulo Freire was a well-read, educated, deeply intellectual man, often working to organize workers in conditions of complete illiteracy, not only functional illiteracy. The divide between the kinds of knowledge he and his pupils had was as large as t can be while being from the same culture. Because of this experience, and because of all his education, his thought evolved into a dialectic of co-creation of knowledge rather than of mere instruction and imposition of knowledge from the "more" knowledgeable part to the "less" knowledgeable one.

Reading theory is a good thing, don't get me wrong, and since many of us enjoy it (because we're nerds), we tend to forget there are other forms of knowledge and education available, and that we should use them. Good ol' 'theory-informed praxis".

In conclusion: those of us who are physically/mentally able to go outside, rub elbows with the people most brutalized by capitalism, and really listen to what they have to say, should do that. It can take the form of volunteering to teach more "practical skills", and not only political education, or any kind of community organizing.

Those of us who can't, can move theory forward, too, support those on the ground, especially since there are so many ways to collaborate now compared to decades ago.

TL;DR: read Freire. Go outside (if you can) .

[-] [email protected] 24 points 3 days ago

In my experience, teaching people who are actually illiterate is much easier than teaching people who are functionally illiterate, because functionally illiterate people will fight with you on the meaning and logic of basic instructions.

[-] [email protected] 24 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

But this misses the point of what I was trying to say, or rather, what I gather Freire said throughout his work. It's not about transmitting information from teacher to pupil, but about being a facilitator in their own liberation. If them fighting you on the meaning of stuff helps them gain class consciousness, and you can do it without negative consequences to yourself, why not? Question why is there conflict, and why instructions are necessary in education.

[-] [email protected] 10 points 3 days ago

I will check Freire out, ty for the rec.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 3 days ago

Yes, barely anyone participated.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago

Yeah, I sort of remember that, too.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

Is a book club the correct approach then?

I ask because I was just thinking this with regards to theory in general. I usually have 45 minutes of bus time in the AM and PM, and was thinking that (or shorter) would be a good time to target for both reading and responding.

One thing I think could help is almost a polemical approach (or whatever the non-confrontational version would be). Like someone who’s read the text before offers some points on a section, and then others can support/refute those. But word/character limited so it’s not an exhausting process.

Like a “bite sized” approach

[-] [email protected] 5 points 3 days ago

Pedagogy of the Oppressed

This seems like a good shout out, I'm going to try to read this soon.

this post was submitted on 29 May 2025
65 points (100.0% liked)

askchapo

23013 readers
131 users here now

Ask Hexbear is the place to ask and answer ~~thought-provoking~~ questions.

Rules:

  1. Posts must ask a question.

  2. If the question asked is serious, answer seriously.

  3. Questions where you want to learn more about socialism are allowed, but questions in bad faith are not.

  4. Try [email protected] if you're having questions about regarding moderation, site policy, the site itself, development, volunteering or the mod team.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS