65
submitted 2 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Been seeing more and more evidence that mass literacy is both massively diminished compared to the 20th century and accelerating in its decline across the world, especially in relatively highly educated countries. This problem is obviously much more severe amongst the working class than others, as historically tends to be the case.

If we want the masses to get to grips with a communist understanding of the world, which requires a lot of reading and discussion of text, surely this is an issue we need to grapple with. Current political education initiatives usually bring together smaller, highly-literate (typically university educated) groups of people, which tend to remain insular and rarely seem to engage with the broader working class. I am convinced that a significant barrier to mass political education is that so many "literate" people are unable to read a simple paragraph.

How do we rectify this situation? It seems historically unique because in the past, illiterate people had no illusions about the fact that they couldn't read and were enthusiastic about learning (at least, in general). Nowadays, I can imagine that most people would not view their literacy as something that needs to be improved, and many will even react with hostility to such a suggestion.

What's the correct approach? Do we need to emphasise the practical rewards that those who engage with theoretical texts benefit from? Take a direct approach and offer reading comprehension sessions? Interested to hear what others think.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago

Yes, barely anyone participated.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

Yeah, I sort of remember that, too.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

Is a book club the correct approach then?

I ask because I was just thinking this with regards to theory in general. I usually have 45 minutes of bus time in the AM and PM, and was thinking that (or shorter) would be a good time to target for both reading and responding.

One thing I think could help is almost a polemical approach (or whatever the non-confrontational version would be). Like someone who’s read the text before offers some points on a section, and then others can support/refute those. But word/character limited so it’s not an exhausting process.

Like a “bite sized” approach

this post was submitted on 29 May 2025
65 points (100.0% liked)

askchapo

23012 readers
102 users here now

Ask Hexbear is the place to ask and answer ~~thought-provoking~~ questions.

Rules:

  1. Posts must ask a question.

  2. If the question asked is serious, answer seriously.

  3. Questions where you want to learn more about socialism are allowed, but questions in bad faith are not.

  4. Try [email protected] if you're having questions about regarding moderation, site policy, the site itself, development, volunteering or the mod team.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS