view the rest of the comments
news
Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.
Rules:
-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --
-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --
-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --
-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today/ . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --
-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--
-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--
-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --
-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --
Both 'lab leak' hypotheses (China & US) alleged that the escaped virus, before being edited, was sourced from bats in southwest China, so I don't understand how this changes anything really.
Look at this New Yorker article from five years ago, for example:
In fact, there was a DARPA contract that said "we're gonna take bat coronaviruses from Yunnan and edit them".
spoiler
Two of the biggest indicators of lab-manipulation, according to Jeffrey Sachs and others, is the presence of the furin cleavage site and atypical codons in its genome for a particular amino acid (don't remember which one it is rn). Apparently, those features are common in virology lab work but practically nonexistent in wild betacoronaviruses. If this study had found those features in the nearest ancestor, then my interest might be piqued.
A truly compelling discovery would involve finding, in the wild, the exact genome that was first discovered in human patients (or a few base pairs removed). That may sound like an unreasonably high bar of evidence, but, if I'm not mistaken, precisely that has been done for the first SARS virus and also a previous pandemic^[https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4542197/] caused by a lab leak, so it really isn't.
Edit: There is also the serologic antibody evidence cited by China suggesting the virus was in the US first, which is only consistent with the Maryland lab leak hypothesis. Funnily enough, Jeffrey Sachs is ignorant of this; he believes it leaked from the Wuhan lab, but he recognizes that the virology work there was being done at the behest of DARPA and originated with Ralph Baric in North Carolina, and so he rightfully blames the US in that scenario.
Edit2: Leaked emails revealed USAMRIID scientists saying to each other "oh shit, this SARS-2 thing looks like a lab-made virus WTF!?" Weeks later the same scientists published a paper arguing that it was obviously natural and it was silly to think otherwise.
Sachs's explanation of a hair-brained scheme to infect bats with coronavirus in order to inoculate bats from more dangerous viruses which would protect US troops stationed in SEA somehow is orders of magnitudes stupider than the US developing coronavirus in Fort Derrick as a bioweapon, which means that's probably what actually happened lol
Yeah, lab editing would involve relatively minor (in terms of number of base pairs altered), so pan-genome scans would still show the pandemic-causing strain as closely related to its parent strain.
The more persuasive evidence is the apparent similarity to the SARS outbreak but I wouldn't call that proof.