59
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 14 May 2025
59 points (100.0% liked)
chapotraphouse
13918 readers
755 users here now
Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.
No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer
Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
I don't think this is a specifically IT-Problem, this is an HR-Problem. In an organization of any given size they're not gonna be able to comprehend the details of whatever they're recruiting at all. How would they?
But at the same time, HR is the cops of the corporate world, so it givess you major brainworms. You figure you're qualified to recruit anybody, I mean, you're HR! We're fucking HR, all we do to pick candidates is at best do astrology but it is so, so important and since we're job-cops we have the red telephone to the CEO. Sure, you might think "guy who worked with a ticketing system that's 2% off what we use" would be a great fit, but luckily we here in HR are there to state that since this isn't 100% what we're looking for, no. Also we've given a report to the CEO that among the unwashed masses upon which we spit, there isn't a single qualified applicant as based on matching keywords in their resume. Sorry, boss, maybe drum up the "work shy" rhetoric some more? We love you and that will help us a lot, there's just too many bad people, dangit!
In the sense of it's weird that the Marxists are the only people left concerned with how an organization works, if you are a CEO and trust your HR you have failed at your job. These are still just your employees, they don't give a fuck. Left to their own devices they will implement the worst application progress known to man, because it means they can just tell you the aforementioned lies. You should treat them as a hostile entity to your enterprise, but they do also fire people, so they get special privilege.
I've got this from external recruiters as well. You know, the people who usually get paid commission by finding people to hire? You'd think they'd exaggerate a candidate's skills, not nitpick like that.